when we're attacked, they'll blame Osama again, but...heads up

[mopaul]

i mean pay attention this time, try not to be too horrified to see what's going on around you. stay frosty, and don't automatically buy the official white house lies like last time.

a mysterious voice on a tape makes a threat. the c.i.a. says it's officially osama, oh really? then the attack happens, and bingo, osama is pre emptively blamed, although no real proof was given that he attacked us on nine eleven. there was no trial, there was a trumped up republican investigation.

we are all being played again.

[Skittles]

1. then we put out ads with bush saying OSAMA CAN RUN BUT CAN'T HIDE

f***ing inompetent piece of SHIT bush

[Cooley Hurd]

2. After the next attack, you will undoubtedly hear calls to "stand behind...

"...the president," as we did after 9/11, from both ends of the political spectrum.

What NEEDS to be said is: "We're NOT safer! They let ANOTHER attack happen, DESPITE the increased surveillance!"

Sure, they'll call us traitors, un-American, whatthefuckever... But, to leave these bozos, and their corrupt political apparatus, in place MAKES AMERICA LESS SAFE!

[mopaul]

3. we should be pre emptively prepared for the worst

put NOTHING past these fuckers. when the attack happens, there is no nicey nice scenario, it's all bad.

[EuroObserver]

5. Check out Chirac-related comments here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2053496#2053696

[CrazyOrangeCat]

6. Don't these kool-aiders understand . . .

. . . that with voice synthisizers as complex as are available on the market, that you can make ANYBODY sound like OBL?

Never mind. I know the answer to my question.

[B Calm]

7. I look for military rule to take control. They'll round up American

Muslims, put them in box cars and ship them to some unknown spot out west!

[malaise]

11. Seems to me that the message is

if we don't get our own way re the Patriot Act, the right to spy and anything else we choose, there will be another...you know what.

The only questions that need to be asked are what will these men not do to control the planet and how will the citizens of the world deal with this mess.

[mopaul]

4. after the attack, they'll say that osama admitted it beforehand

and the chumps will believe it, but i won't. it's just a spooky voice on a scratchy tape, how is this proof?

[Swamp Rat]

8. mo, check this out:

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/jan-june06/osama_1-19.html

(snip)

"MAMOUN FANDY: Right, but this particular tape is not terribly inspiring, just looking at the language of it. This is the first tape of bin Laden that has no single verse from the Koran. It does not have the flowery language of Arabic.

It seems to me that it is written in English first, and then translated into Arabic. It is very western style of tape. It is not very characteristic of bin Laden, at least it tells me that the non-Arabic speaking within the al-Qaida network are taking over the organization --

JIM LEHRER: You mean he didn't write this is what you are suggesting?

MAMOUN FANDY: The Arabic speakers in al-Qaida, the parts that are coming from the Arab world, are losing to the non-Arabic speaker, so it's really becoming more of a South Asian organization, rather than an Arab organization."

(snip)

[mopaul]

9. i want to see him reading today's NYT at his monitor, i want PROOF

a spooky voice on a tape 'verified' by the holy c.i.a. is supposed to impress my glorious ass?

[Democrat 4 Ever]

10. If we are attacked again you can bet it will be because liberals

"emboldened our enemies" or liberals didn't renew the Patriotic Act or Democrats kept them from using illegal wiretaps for getting the intel they need to stop the attack. It has never been, will never be anything but Dems and liberals fault - no matter what. Hell, even Clinton will be blames but Chucklenuts and Cheney will just sling mud and let Snotty Scotty make false statements to cover their ass.

Bush NEEDS another attack to make sure they sheeple get back into the fold. Baring another attack we will have endless terror alerts, plenty of announcements they have intercepted info we are going to get hit. They will play to their lowest common denominator - fear flogging of their chickenshit chickhawks. They will not accept any responsibility for doing a piss poor job but turn it around and blame the Dems - just in time for the mid terms.

[zbdent]

12. Just in time for the mid-terms . . . "BOO!"

"Look, we have the Dems holding up the Patriot Act, and this guy is running around bloeing things up (never mind the fact that, after three months, Bush was bored with his toy and wanted to bloe up Iraq) BECAUSE of the Dems . . . "

You can just imagine the RW echo chamber (aka the MSM/SCLM) . . .

(bloe an intentional misspell due to PC hanging up - :tinfoilhat:)

[oblivious]

13. I'm sure they'll blame Iran, not Osama. Absolutely sure.

[mopaul]

14. good pre emptive thinking, it worked with saddam so well

osama hit us, we hit saddam, osama hits us again, we hit iran, the wackier the daydream, the scarier and more likely it is.

[oblivious]

15. Yes that makes sense. Osama hit us, so we have to act pre-emptively again.

We can't wait for Iran to give Osama nukes, can't wait for a mushroom cloud in the heartland, blah blah.

Edit: and half of America will be happy as long as someone is bombed in retaliation. Even better if it's one of the axis-of-evil countries.