Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ's David Wessel: Is Inequality Over Wages Worsening?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 01:25 AM
Original message
WSJ's David Wessel: Is Inequality Over Wages Worsening?
The Wall Street Journal

CAPITAL
By DAVID WESSEL


Is Inequality Over Wages Worsening?
January 19, 2006; Page A2

A distinguishing feature of the U.S. economy of the past quarter-century is a sharp increase in economic inequality. No matter how you slice the data, very well-paid folks have done better than the rest.


(snip)

Roughly 90% of full-time workers earn less than $90,000 a year. What about them? In the 1980s, wages of $90,000-a-year workers (measured in today's dollars) pulled away from workers at the middle, and wages of those in the middle pulled away from workers at the bottom. The consensus diagnosis: Computer technology changed the workplace and made employers prize and pay more for skill and education. The 1990s were different. Nearly all workers did better than they did in the 1980s -- even those at the bottom, the ones who notice when the minimum wage goes up. And inequality wasn't as simple to diagnose. The $90,000-a-year crowd continued to do better than men and women in the middle, but the gap between the middle and the bottom didn't keep widening.

(snip)

In the 1980s, technology whacked employment and wages of those at the bottom whose jobs were easily automated or shipped overseas. And it helped those who leveraged computers to be more productive. In the 1990s, though, those whose work was made more valuable by computers saw wages and job prospects grow. But the same goes for many low-wage workers who work for those at the top -- janitors, waiters, gardeners, home-health aides and massage therapists. The losers are in the middle, those whose jobs and wages are threatened by the increasing sophistication of computers and workers overseas.

If these scholars are right, then the answer is to restructure American schools so they prepare workers for jobs for which technology is either a wage booster or irrelevant -- and teach them to avoid jobs most vulnerable to technology or outsourcing.

Write to David Wessel at capital@wsj.com

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB113762975701250282.html (subscription)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. IT staff are unemployed now, their wages have dropped if employed
Edited on Fri Jan-20-06 01:38 AM by upi402
WSJ can illuminate at times. But I don't understand how educating kids for another skill with fading demand is the answer.
Outsourcing sucks, and now the white collars hear that sucking sound.
Thanks Al Gore and Bill Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-20-06 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Was thinking the same thing
Also, one cannot escape the conclusion that the gap started to widen during the Reagan years, while it slowed during the Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC