Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Loserman attacks Maxine Waters and Ned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:48 PM
Original message
Loserman attacks Maxine Waters and Ned
"I am committed to this campaign, to a different kind of poltics, to bring the democratic party back from Ned Lamont, Maxine Waters to the mainstream."

So, "a different kind of politics" sounds like the same kind you have used this entire campaign, Loserman--personal attacks. You know you can't win on your record of support for Bush and his war.

www.dailykos.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. As Bill Hicks would say,
"Suck Satan's cock"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I think that's what he's doing already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Symphony of Freedom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm glad Bush won in 2000...
Imagine how much a pathetic Veep like Loserman would have demoralised the left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Right--Gore would have kept him in his place
Bush has proved to be the most destructive, inept president of modern times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I've always said ... there would not have been a terrorist attack on 9/11
because ObL would have been laughing his ass off watching the US be torn asunder by the psychos who stormed the White House (with guns a-blazin) had the Supreme Court voted the other way, with Rush and company spurring on the freepturds with the claims "Get out of Bush's House!"

With dittododo mouths foaming in anger, this country would have been in a civil war ... armed by the NRA, backed by "religious leaders" saying that Satan had entered the White House ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Wrong.
A Lieberman VP, with Gore (in his rightful position) as President, would have been better for this country by several orders of magnitude and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Jesus.
What sour grapes. I hope he self-destructs before too long. He's gonna piss off too many people if he keeps this crap up. :puke:
Why doesn't the jerk just change to Republican???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. So... Let Me Get This Straight....
...Lieberman loses the Democratic nomination for Senate basically because he's not Democratic enough. So now he thinks he's going to automatically get all available Republican and independant votes by spewing right-wing talking points from now 'til November?

Am I the only one that thinks the Lieberman team is miscalculating just a tad?

First of all, no matter how much Lieberman woos Republicans, a majority of 'em simply will not vote for any Democrat. Period. Some of 'em will vote for Lieberman in the hopes of making things difficult for the Democrats as a whole, but most will either hold their nose and vote for Mr. Schlessinger or sit the whole thing out altogether.

Secondly, how far does Senator Lieberman expect to get with independents while unabashedly supporting a war in Iraq? Last time I checked, a majority of independents were against the war as well.

Third, Joe can go ahead and abandon all hope of getting any significant support from loyal Democrats from here on in. They're already pissed with his track record of "me first" campaigning. Running for both Vice President and Senate in 2000. Running now as an independent. Bashing Democratic mainstays like Ms. Waters because they simply support the DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE who BTW agrees with their anti-war stance.

Joe will still get more votes than I'd like to see him get, but it won't be as easy as he thinks---especially if he STILL hasn't gotten a clue. Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC