Tucker seemed positively GLEEFUL talking about Hillary

[Horse with no Name]

changing positions on the Iraq war.
I only saw bits and pieces in passing, but wouldn't be surprised if he didn't call her a "flip-flopper".
I did hear some of the recycled rhetoric about "being for it before she was against it"....Do these guys ever get tired of sounding like mockingbirds?

[jimshoes]

1. They're not very creative

especially TC. That's why they must rely on worn out pithy phrases like "flip-flopper" "cut n' run" and the ever popular "for it before against it" dreck. It must suck being so creativly challenged.

[Double T]

2. When someone blatantly lies to you about so-called facts.......

regarding the reasons for going to war, the facts are later proved to be absolutely fabricated and false, then you change your position based on the actual truth about the REAL reasons for going to war, how the hell is that flip-flopping?!?!?

[Horse with no Name]

3. The Devil is always in the details

That's why the corporate media chooses to omit pesky little things like facts.

[Double T]

4. Our Dem representatives need to learn to get a........

LOUD REBUTTAL VOICE when idiots like tucker speak their lies.

[sendero]

6. When you wait two more years..

.... after all that is known, it damn sure is flip-flopping.

[Double T]

8. ...and with bushco it usually takes two or more years to find.....

the real truth (and proof) of their deceptive statements and actions!!

[LSK]

5. that asshat is still on the air??

[BuyingThyme]

7. She changed her position? Is there a position paper?

[RDU Socialist]

9. to be fair to carlson he came out against the iraq war when it was

still fairly popular. Granted he wasn't like Buchanan, and George Will who were against it from 2003 and before, but nonetheless, the more people on the right who realize this imperialistic policy (which goes against the intent of our founding , but history has never been the expansionist wing of both party's strong suit).

[Crunchy Frog]

10. When did she change her position?

Or does *ucker think that if you criticize Rumsfeld, it means you oppose the war? :shrug: