Innocents pay dearly for the 'new' Middle East
Marc H. Ellis, BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Thursday, August 03, 2006
No, not all Jews support Israeli policies in Lebanon, Gaza and the West Bank. Not all Arabs and Muslims support Hezbollah in their policies of provocation and destabilization. And not all Americans support American policy in the region. Which doesn't mean the nay-sayers are self-hating Jews, anti-Semites or American bashers. Those who say "no" see the world in a different way. A way where burning children are past tense rather than present, where the Jewish ethical tradition is reclaimed and wrestled away from empire, and where America's voice is not the voice of green-lighting war, arming the various participants for renewed battles and pretending to be even-handed. The nay-sayers say no to Condoleezza Rice; her anguish in recent days is the anguish of American policies coming home to roost. Too much civilian casualty in Qana? Simply a larger number in one place and time. Did the reports of the innocent killed day after day go unread, death as a clearance project, paving the way for the "new" Middle East?
"Birth pangs," the language she uses; rather death dirges, the innocent dying without her comment or commitment. Our policy in Lebanon is not so different than our policy in Iraq. At least for Americans, Iraqi deaths are blips on our television screens. The Iraqi dead are never named. Rarely are the Lebanese or the Palestinian dead. Their names are difficult for us to pronounce, we, the liberators of nations whose very culture is so unimportant to us that we don't feel the need to know their language. Our own soldiers die daily, too, their opinions about the war rarely solicited. Are they, too, unimportant? Some Americans believe that Israel is the front line of defense for the West — against the marauding Muslims who threaten us with MullahDarkness. Some Israelis believe this. Others don't. Thus the demonstrations against Israeli policies by Israelis in Tel Aviv. A minority, yet important nonetheless and growing daily. After all, Israelis and Arabs live in the Middle East and will live there after the carnage, the cease-fires, real and imagined, and after this war, and the wars to come.
American Jews don't speak for all of Israel. And they don't live there. It's an illusion to think that Israeli Jews who die in Lebanon die for Jews in America. Surrogate death is cheap; the fallen are forgotten even as we trumpet our lofty ethical "standards." We Americans also have to live in the world after. In recent days, Rice has received an earful of world opinion almost unanimous against the war. The numbers of dead climb daily — without factoring in the Something Bigger devastation that might be around the corner. Iran and Syria cowardly remain on the sidelines. Why not pay up with their treasures and infrastructure if the cause is so noble?
Israel signals them that the war is limited to Lebanon if they stay out. Israel, too, is afraid of an all-out war. In the fog of war, chips can fall in different ways. Why not have surrogates do the fighting and dying? The message at Qana is obvious. Flee or be killed. If you flee, you might be killed anyway. No exit for the surrogates. As the "civilized" world stands by. Shall we protect the innocent? Yes, unless they are defined as not being innocent by virtue of their being in the way of Something Bigger.
----------------
Ellis, a Baylor University professor and director of the Center for Jewish Studies, is author of "Toward a Jewish Theology of Liberation."
http://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/08/3ellis_edit.html