Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So does this mean we lost the war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 04:05 AM
Original message
So does this mean we lost the war?
Now that we have to negotiate with the 'enemy'?

"Bush Seeks His Enemies' Help in Iraq
by Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON - To avoid failure of its mission in Iraq, the George W. Bush administration has been driven to seek the help of two major enemies -- the Sunni insurgents and the government of Iran -- but both initiatives have failed to make progress because officials were not given any real negotiating authority.

U.S. officials in Baghdad are now pursuing contacts with both declared enemies, with the aim of obtaining their cooperation in overcoming otherwise seemingly insurmountable obstacles to success in Iraq. In both cases, however, the White House has been unwilling to approve concessions required to reach a deal benefiting both sides.

Administration policymakers have apparently recognised that, without the help of Iran and the Sunni insurgent leaders, it faces the likelihood of spiraling sectarian violence, undiminished Sunni armed resistance, al Qaeda terrorist havens and predominant Iranian political influence.

Some U.S. officials came to realise in 2005 that U.S. policy was leading to consequences that contradicted its larger interests. Its main Iraqi allies, the militant Shiite parties, were aligned with its main enemy, Iran, while U.S. forces were fighting against Sunni insurgent organisations whose longer term interests lay in opposing both al Qaeda and Iran.

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0117-03.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not exactly.
The fact that we started the war means we lost the war. It happened simultaneously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Don't confuse defeat with political desparation.
I'm sure McClellan can explain it best by blaming the Democrats for emboldening the enemy.

I bet this throws a wrench in the whole War On Terror. What will happen if all the world's terrorists decide to leave Iraq? Then we'll have to hunt them down one at a time in other countries!

GW's probably trying to negotiate a deal where they all stay in the Central Front.
He's a military "jeenius".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The War in Error.... Amerika's new cottage industry, franchises
available upon request, drones and unarmored humvees sold separately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And that puts all the cards in Iran's hands then...
Iran's ties to the Shiites in Iraq will undoubtedly prosper as a result of the US negotiating with them. Iran will have little difficulty raising the stakes at will, thereby maintaining Iraq as a viable political and military buffer while acheiving small concessions from the US.

If they play it right, there will be mutually beneficial war for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. FUBAR
comes readily to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. But we've been told time and again we've been made safer.
And how come US "intelligence" couldn't fathom out all this? They've got resources and experts none of us could dream of.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well the simple answer is they did fathom it out...
Edited on Thu Jan-19-06 02:18 PM by Dr_eldritch
But it didn't jibe with the fantasy world the BA needed to create to get the war rolling.
Just like that fateful day I realized, "we're screwed", when I watched Rumsfeld talk down to his own Four-Star General...

They believed what they wanted to believe.

This is the most criminally incompetent administration ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-19-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Same thing Nixon did to get us out of Vietnam

1) secretly negotiate with your "enemy", and those who support them
2) continue to wage war and talk beligerently,
3) all the while harshly condemning those who call for an end to the war
4) negotiate, and sign a peace treaty with the "enemy"
5) Declare victory and run for home
6) Pass out the Nobel Peace Prizes
7) Stand idly by while the former "enemy" destroys the puppet government you abandoned
8) Blame the Democrats for losing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC