|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:29 AM Original message |
In what may be O'Connor's last ruling of career-SC-Dodges Big Abortion Rul |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. Unanimous ruling! WOW. Are the RW's going to be pi**ed at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Um, actually the court ruled that the appeals court was wrong in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. It appears that they are too stupid to understand the decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
2. it was, if I can us the term--a technical decision, as 'undue burden' was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. So the RW right to life crowd wins one - but the Appeals Court may still |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. No, they didn't win one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-18-06 10:59 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Someday I will learn how the Court got a line item veto! :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
f-bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:36 AM Response to Original message |
8. Chickenshits!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC