Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New field manual for soldiers: “Lose moral legitimacy, lose the war,”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 07:31 PM
Original message
New field manual for soldiers: “Lose moral legitimacy, lose the war,”
July 16, 2006

US’s new plan to win in Iraq

The Sunday Times
Sarah Baxter , Washington
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2272066,00.html

THE US army has turned years of conventional military thinking on its head in a new field manual for soldiers on counter-insurgency operations in Iraq.

The manual, the first for 20 years, emphasises that it is far more important to secure moral legitimacy and the support of the community than to kill insurgents and win battles.

It has been drawn up by General David Petraeus, who is known as one of America’s more culturally sensitive commanders. He led the 101st Airborne Division, the Screaming Eagles, into Iraq and set up training for the Iraqi forces before returning to the US last year to head the army staff college at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

The manual’s conclusions are stark. “Lose moral legitimacy, lose the war,” it warns. In what could prove to be uncomfortable reading for Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, it emphasises that “efforts to build a legitimate government through illegitimate action — including unjustified or excessive use of force, unlawful detention, torture or punishment without trial — are self-defeating, even against insurgents who conceal themselves amid non-combatants”.

full report: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2272066,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too Damn Late For That!
Edited on Sat Jul-15-06 07:35 PM by DistressedAmerican
There is no way to have an illegal invasion of a non-aggressor country and still maintain "moral legitimacy". We have none. This is way too little, way too late.

They should have thought about that before going in, before Abu Ghraib, before Falluja, before the many, many incidents of abuse, rape and murder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a little late for this, isn't it?
Belligerence, conquest, fraud, lies...invasion of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC