Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq war was lost the day it started

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 10:57 AM
Original message
Iraq war was lost the day it started
http://www.suntimes.com/output/greeley/cst-edt-greel14.html

If we "cut and run" from Iraq, Republican senators argued recently, we will lose our credibility, dishonor the memory of those who have already died there, break our promise to the Iraqi people and settle for something less than victory. The United States does not quit that way. So Republicans will run in November against dishonor, flag burners, gay marriages, the New York Times, the Supreme Court and the Democrats who want to lose Iraq (just like they ran a half century ago against Democrats who "lost" China). Will it work? Sure it will.

In fact, the United States did cut and run in Korea and Vietnam. It did settle for something less than victory in these two wars. The United States did abandon the North Korean and Vietnamese people. It did dishonor the dead soldiers, if withdrawing from an impossible conflict does dishonor those who have died. Some of the senators know that. Most of the American people, ignorant as they are of history, have forgotten.

However, the truth is that Iraq was "lost" the day the war started. It was an artificial country like Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, stitched together after the Great War. The British forced its rebellious tribes together with bombs and poison gas. They left the minority Sunni tribes in charge. They ruled brutally through eight decades, viciously suppressing the Shiite majority and other tribes, particularly the Kurds in the north. Saddam Hussein was merely the logical conclusion of the cruel dictators who ruled before him. snip

Galbraith has been around Iraq long enough to know that the first Bush administration supported Saddam in his war with Iran, providing weapons, equipment and intelligence, some of it in support of poison gas attacks on the Iranians. He also remembers that the previous Bush urged the Shiites and Kurds to rise up against Saddam after the Gulf War. He and his advisers did not believe that they would take him seriously. Hundreds of thousands died. The people of Iraq have very good reason for hating Americans.

<snip>Therefore, having ignored the lessons of history, they repeat its mistakes. Americans will continue to die in Iraq because no one making decisions could bother reading its history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Camp_Democracy Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. "The war is not meant to be won...
...it is meant to be continuous"
George Orwell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. It was lost from the moment the PNAC group decided that it would
be feasible to attack Iraq for the purpose of stealing their oil. Add that to the fact that an invasion against one of the "axis of evil" was just what the blood thirsty right wing was looking for to win the election in the U.S. It was an evil and unfeasible idea from the beginning. We are reaping the "whirlwind".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. I disagree sir.
The problem is you are viewing this through the prism of history. If the current Despotic Regime (meaning the one here in the land of the free and home of the brave) succeeds in setting up a puppet government which allows oil corporations to export as much oil as possible in the next 20-25 years, then the inevitable reaction (ala Iran in 1979) seeks to oust us and becomes ardently anti-American for generations WILL NOT MATTER.

Those who exploited the area will long have made fortunes, and those Rich persons/groups/corporations having allied themselves with Government will ensure legislation which safeguards their ill-gotten gains forever will be safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Vietnamese understood that war isn't about body counts,
tonnage of bombs dropped or, even the number of battles won or lost.

We didn't understand that then.

We certainly don't understand that now.

According to the goals set by the administration, nothing, nada, zip, has been accomplished except enrichment of the military/industrial complex and the gravediggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sadly I think the point of Iraq was enrichment
Edited on Fri Jul-14-06 12:44 PM by genie_weenie
of the MIC.

Maybe even the whole War on Terror since Afghanistan has been treated as sideshow. Not central enough in the ME to those who profit of death (although the pipelines from the Caspian are going to make so people Rich) and not long enough to include yearly supplements to the 400 Billion DoD budget of 100+ Billion.

edit to add the last part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC