Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Climate Sensors Dropped From US Weather Satellites

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:36 PM
Original message
Climate Sensors Dropped From US Weather Satellites
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 01:40 PM by mnhtnbb
This is from Science magazine, which requires subscription or pay per article. http://tinyurl.com/rkv83

I'll summarize:

16June2006 article describes the decision made 5 June by the U.S. government to "strip several climate instruments off a suite of polar-orbiting satellites intended to provide the next generation of weather and climate-monitoring data for military, civilian, and scientific users."


The National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) program was born in 1994 as a joint project of the DOD and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), with NASA
as a "junior partner". "For climate scientists, the alliance would combine NASA's expertise in building and flying high-quality research payloads with NOAA's commitment to operational satellites."

"We're seeing a disintegration of the U.S. environmental satellite system," says Richard Anthes, head of the organization that manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, CO.

"Essentially, NPOESS is saying NOAA won't be doing climate," says Kathie Kelly, who studies atmosphere-ocean coupling at the University of Washington's Applied Physics Laboratory in Seattle. "Basically, no one is going to do climate."



This is the response of the Bush administration to the threat of global warming. Cut back and forget collecting data.


"Twelve years into the program, and 3 years before the first launch, we are at a critical point where there is little room left to recover from further missteps,," noted Rep Vern Ehlers (R-MI). The chair of the House Science Committee, Rep Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), said, "How the hell can we do our job without sufficient information?"


Whoa! Angry Republicans?! These are guys who are getting fed up with the Bush Administration attack on science! Maybe we should drop them a line
applauding their efforts to get more funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. If we don't monitor it, it's not happening
real simple science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. It's a corrolary to the Rumsfeld Doctrine
If it's not recorded, it didn't happen. That's why Rumsfeld was so pissed about Abu Ghraib - he was mad about the pictures of torture, not the torture itself.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Burying your head in the sand is not a good response
to global warming. I guess if they don't collect the data, they can't prove global warming. More of the Republican war on science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. SO THATS HOW BUSH SOLVES GLOBAL WARMING
STOP RECORDING THE TEMPERATURE!!!!

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fucking assholes.
*&$^%&$*(**&#^&*$(%*&#^&
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. If the climate sensors are dropped then what good are weather sats?
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 01:50 PM by Jara sang
Geospatial imagery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Satellites will still carry 3 of original 9 instruments to monitor
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 01:52 PM by mnhtnbb
weather and "collect climate information." Key instruments wanted by scientists have been dropped. The instruments that lost out gave priority to weather forecasting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Original fleet of 6 satellites with 9 instruments would have
collected data on 55 environmental elements. New budget allows for only 4 satellites with 3 instruments. Instead of first launch in 2006 followed up by final launch in 2016, now first launch will be 2009 with last launch 2022.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. 2022? I can see the headlines now...
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 02:27 PM by KansDem
July 7, 2022

AP-Houston. Halliburton announced today it was canceling the final launch of the weather satellites program due to hot temperatures. "We just can't launch in 136-degree heat; the instruments are too sensitive!" said a Halliburton Space Industries spokesperson, displaying the kind of professionalism the United Corporations of American has come to expect from Halliburton since it took over NASA. President Jenna Bush reiterated the need to monitor the world's temperature. "Like, just like my sister, former President Barbara Bush, our uncle before her, President Jeb Bush, and our dad President George W Bush said, 'Global warming is a serious problem.'" "We need to do something about it!" Asked what she intends to do, President J. Bush replied, "Golly, like, you know, we need information. We don't really, like, you know, know if the world is heating up, because, like, I mean, we need the information the satellite would have given us, I think" "We need to, like, look at 'sound science.'" The President went on to affirm she will do something about global warming, just as soon as it is determined global warming exists. "We'll, like, you know, launch the rocket just as soon as it cools down." And to show the Bush Family penchant for "decisive leadership," she added "But not before!"

edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xzyra Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. not surprising, but really scary and sad anyway
God help us all.

;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Isn't Lil' Rickie Sanitarium trying to privatize weather data?
I read that awhile back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I remember that, too, he was linked with AccuWeather
IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. That is correct
Santorum wanted to get a bill passed which would prohibit the National Weather Service from providing most of it's data to the public for free, requiring instead that the data be provided to companies like Accuweather which would then package and sell it. It was the blatant privatization of a governmental agency, in order to allow private companies to make money off of information collected by the government and paid for by us, the taxpayers.

Just more looting of the treasury, made complex enough to almost get by the public. Almost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Thanks for the additional information
Looting the treasury does appear to be one of their primary goals. And I can't help wondering just what was in it for lil Ricky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. !!!!
I hadn't read or heard that. The self-enriching corporatizing greed and contempt for the Ameican public is apparantly totally bottomless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Accuweather is run by Christofascists, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. yup. . . God forbid there should be anything public
available to the public...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. they want us keep dumb and vulnerable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. A better longitudinal record of an ever-changing Earth
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 02:10 PM by mnhtnbb
was to be the result of DOD, NOAA, NASA getting together to form NPOESS (National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System progam".

The promise hasn't been realized "and there's a chance it may never come to pass."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. They are insane. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. we will still have the euopean,russian,chinesse
sat information. the republicans can solve the problem but they are of afraid of the 5 million people who watch fox news each week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. And thank the stars we do. Hopefully, others will keep the human...
...race going. I'm not counting on this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lutefisk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. Do we?
"As the NOAA is the only current source of global climate information from satellites, researchers may have some difficulties in their climatological studies due to a lack of solid data."

http://www.thestormtrack.com/2006/06/if_they_cant_provide_it_then_i.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. they just don't believe in science
these right wing radial religious extremists fascists have got to go. this is totally insane where are we living?? in what era?

this regime must go. and take all your rapturists with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. In his novel, 'The House of God' Dr. Samuel Shem says--
"If you don't want to find a fever, don't take a temperature."

And Doctor Dumbya agrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Angry NY Republican
They're the Republicans who have to deal with acid rain issues coming from coal burning and car emissions from the west. Also, possibly, a descendent of the Teddy Roosevelt environmental Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. What a short sighted yet common trend from Bushco. Dismantle
dismantle, dismantle. Seems any sensible program is up for the block if it's not directly related to defense spending, tax cuts or a Republican election. It's really disheartening at times for those of us who believe in a broad role for the federal government in science and technology, health and welfare, and all those "human" programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. This is a really disturbing, creepy development.
Edited on Fri Jul-07-06 10:32 PM by chill_wind
k&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. any links to foreign weather services?
I have been using the NOAA website, but it sounds like their info gathering is going to be/has been gutted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Try this
and scroll down to international/foreign

http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/stweath.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. thanks, found great climate site
Check out the U. of East Anglia site...really good docs on climate change. Hard to refute actual graphs.

http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
31. Obviously, they're trying to head off Al Gores' next movie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
32. This is an issue of National Security
What if the Alien Invaders in the future disguise themselves as "Weather"?

Soon we'd all be corralled, ready to be fed to the Alien Hordes.. except of course for Politicians whose job would be to act as Ambassadors, standing at the doors of the great halls, sniffing the Alien butts at each function to ascertain their name and social rank before announcing them at the big celebrations, and the Inaugeration of the "Cloud Monster" as our new planetary Dictator :)

Well, it COULD happen..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
33. The ostrich Initiative?
Sounds like good bushspeak name for this program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
34. Bush* did say he was "fixing" Global Warming didn't he?
Just like he "fixed" the CIA and NSA and virtually every branch of government that keeps America safe and sound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
35. Kicking for anyone with the tiniest doubt remaining on Bush administration
I can't think of anything that more directly shouts "Mene, mene tekel upharsin" than this piece of idiocy.

I wonder what those "angry House Republicans" are going to DO about it. Anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
36. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC