Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has The NY Times Has Been Scammed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 08:56 PM
Original message
Has The NY Times Has Been Scammed?
After seeing that all of the info about SWIFT was out in the open for years, I'm beginning to think that this was a setup by the Bushes to poop on the Times and help themselves. They picked something to "leak" that wasn't actually a secret, so they themselves wouldn't be in doo-doo if they got caught.

The other thing that leads me to this belief is that all of the fringe-right media instantly pounced on the Times alone, whereas, in reality, three other papers broke the story simultaneously. I suspect that the talking points had all gone out prior to the actual publication, and they were only expecting the Times to go with it - the others were a surprise.

Anybody else think this makes sense? Or am I on crack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. You may be on to something...
When they got rid of Judith Miller the WH lost one of it's main mouth pieces....

This is more redirection from Rove.....there is always something churning in the background....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here was the clincher for me...
Norah O'Donnell, one of the ultimate BushCo shills, basically agrees with you re: the simultaneous publications, but only the Times getting called on it, and the appearance that BushCo is deliberately stirring up shit just to help whip up his base.

When Norah doesn't back Bush, you KNOW something funny is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That was my take, as well.
I think this whole thing - especially with this House bs tomorrow - is just a Soviet-style move on the media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Q: Was the Times set up?
A: Judith Miller.

The Times played a major role in:
Promoting "Whitewater"
Smearing the Clintons
Smearing Al Gore
Promoting DimSon's residence in the White House.
Promoting the Iraq war.

The Bushites put the horse's head in the Times' bed for 'political' reasons and the Times has few bed-springs left.

Everything in the Establishment has crashed below the basement level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think the country is on a roll regarding spying by the WH/PNAC. We
Edited on Wed Jun-28-06 09:32 PM by higher class
want to know the depth and breadth of this database amd the extent laws have been broken.

I think there is some bad stuff going on between the NYT-WH-Miller betrayals. There are three or more betrayals involved in that one. I think the the relationship is lethal.

I think the NYT is running scared about the Miller cooperation with Cheney.

Layered on top of this is political capital. They, the WH, must hang on to and energize their lemmings who LOVE to hear about the liberal press.

So, as we know, they take a negative and figure out as many positives as they can - and how to make some money out of it - donations.

(Something tells me that if we ever get to the court room with either the SOTU lies or the forgeries or the leaks or an impeachment, the NYT isn't going to look good. Perhaps there is something going on with them that has much to do with making things right - or they examined the depth of their origins and decided to change course - whatever it is, we will have to wait for a credibile story written by someone inside the NYT).

Right now - THE NYT IS BEING USED ... BIG TIME!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC