Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Non-profit "bagmen" for the White House or whom?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:50 AM
Original message
Non-profit "bagmen" for the White House or whom?
Edited on Sun Jun-25-06 10:50 AM by newyawker99
Non-profit groups, some religious, have been acting as "go-betweens" to funnel tax-exempt money to their special causes, an obvious illegal activity. And some of the leaders of these "tax-exempt" groups skimmed money from the top with each donation. How many years in prisons should they receive?
=============================================
READ THIS!

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/24/AR2006062401080_pf.html

<snip>
Newly released documents in the Jack Abramoff investigation shed light on how the lobbyist secretly routed his clients' funds through tax-exempt organizations with the acquiescence of those in charge, including prominent conservative activist Grover Norquist.

The federal probe has brought a string of bribery-related charges and plea deals. The possible misuse of tax-exempt groups is also receiving investigators' attention, sources familiar with the matter said.

<snip>
The Senate committee report also details Abramoff's dealings with two others from the College Republicans crowd: Ralph Reed, former Christian Coalition executive director; and Amy Moritz Ridenour, president of the National Center for Public Policy Research, which sponsored a golf trip in 2000 to Scotland for then-Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.).

"Call Ralph re Grover doing pass through," Abramoff wrote in a stark e-mail reminder to himself in 1999, a year in which Norquist moved more than $1 million in Abramoff client money to Reed and Christian anti-gambling groups. Reed was working to defeat lotteries and casinos that would have competed with Abramoff's tribal and Internet gambling clients.

<snip>
In September 2002, Abramoff suggested to one of his associates placing $500,000 in client funds with the national center because the group "can direct money at our discretion, anywhere if you know what I mean."

The same morning Abramoff messaged Ridenour: "I might have $500K for you to run through NCPPR. Is this still something you want to do?" Ridenour was enthusiastic: "Yes, we would love to do it."

....much more

===========================

EDIT: COPYRIGHT. PLEASE POST ONLY 4 OR 5 PARAGRAPHS
FROM THE COPYRIGHTED NEWS SOURCE PER DU RULES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's too bad "Hard Labor" has been removed from sentencing...
They can come over and help me "clear brush".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope you have gloves for Ralphie.
He hates it when he messes up his manicure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have special plans for Ralphie...
The sub-pump sump has filled up again...

He can bring his own gloves, but, I'll gladly supply the hip-waders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. Holy cow!
How many republicans will be forced to go straight if they can no longer deduct the cost of committing crime? Obviously the Bush Administration will have to invent another loophole for these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-25-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Will these guys be prosecuted ?
It appears there is evidence to convict. I wonder what the relationship is between Ralph Reed and Jim Dobson at this time? Dobson has been a vocal and strong opponent against gambling. Now he finds that Ralphie was playing both sides of the fence? I can imagine the reaction of Dobson.. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC