Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army takes older recruits, up to age 42 now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 03:10 PM
Original message
Army takes older recruits, up to age 42 now
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyid=2006-06-22T030936Z_01_N21345217_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-RECRUITING-1.xml

Army takes older recruits



By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Army, aiming to make its recruiting goals amid the Iraq war, raised its maximum enlistment age by another two years on Wednesday, while the Army Reserve predicted it will miss its recruiting target for a second straight year.

People can now volunteer to serve in the active-duty Army or the part-time Army Reserve and National Guard up to their 42nd birthday after the move aimed at increasing the number of people eligible to sign up, officials said.

It marked the second time this year the Army has boosted the maximum age for new volunteers, raising the ceiling from age 35 to 40 in January before now adding two more years.


More than three years into the war, the Army continues to provide the bulk of U.S. ground forces in Iraq. Army officials have acknowledged the war has made some recruits and their families wary about volunteering.

The Army Reserve, along with the regular Army and Army National Guard, missed its fiscal 2005 recruiting goal, and it currently lags its fiscal 2006 year-to-date goal by 4 percent.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Momgonepostal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. They must be excited about this over at FReeperland...
Lots of those patriots who really WOULD serve, but are just a bit too old will now have their chances! Woo-hoo!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I might start going to bars again in alabama to give neocons the news....
Now they can REALLY support the war effort! ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Darn, I missed out again.
Maybe next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Geese ... I'm 2 years too old
I am sure, for the militaristic among us (:sarcasm:), the age limit will be raised to 67 ... or maybe 70 pretty soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. This will solve Bush's Social Security problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Gawd, at what point
are we going to look like desperate armies of the past, comprised of the very old and the very young.

The Army needs new incentives for the "I-got-mine-Jack" hyper-jingoistic freeper types; the ones they're using aren't working, otherwise, those "true amurkin patriots" :sarcasm: would be signing up in droves. I dunno, maybe crateloads of Coulter "books" to every new recruit? A date with Annie herself, maybe? Surely she'd be willing to do that, since she's such a supporter of the troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC