Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Still think there isn't any inflation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 04:37 AM
Original message
Still think there isn't any inflation?
Went to the store to pick up a brand of volumizing shampoo. At first glance they didn't appear to have it any more. Looking a little longer, I realized that they did have volumizing shampoo. They had changed the bottle shape, color, fragrance, and size (bigger bottle) and doubled the price. Picking up the bottle, I noticed that the new bottle contains .5 ounces less shampoo than the old bottle that I was looking for.

Hmm... Bigger bottle, doubled price, less shampoo. Sounds like inflation on steroids to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. They really are working overtime
to make it look like "things are just fine, thank-you". Cans of coffee that were 16 oz are down to 11. You can still get a pound of bacon, but the 12oz packages are beginning to show up.

The incredible shrinking groceries.

Scarlett's drapery dress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. nonsense! there's no inflation here!
the new and improved volumizing shampoo is clearly a better product than your old shampoo. so, much of the price increase is due, not to inflation, but to "hedonics" -- the improvement in product.

moreover, you can easily avoid the price increase but substituting a competing product -- say, a non-name volumizing shapoo or a non-"volumizing" shampoo, or just plain soap. official economists have no idea why you don't just use ivory soap to wash your hair.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ivory isn't cheap either.
Gotta go generic in everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. My favorite generic soda
went from $.99 a single sixpack to $5-for-4 two weeks ago. 25% increase. Bugger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. The smaller packaging scam is out in force once again.
I see it in many, many things. What interest me is how suddenly so many brands go to smaller more expensive sizes at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Look at the price of gas, heating oil, etc etc etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. And what about the chocolate rations?
and the Victory gin?

Somebody forgot to tell the Bushistas that Orwell's 1984 is a novel, not a manual for governance.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. Be Careful Though
There are times when the formulas change just enough that you actually need to use a little less per shampooing. (This is especially true in things like laundry or dish detergents.) If you use the same amount as before, you're not getting any better cleaning or volumizing, you're just wasting money.

So, you might want to consider using a little less per use and see if it still works ok. Then, at least you'll be back to break even.

The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. a little less coffee?
a little less canned veggies?
a little less dog food?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Are You Willfully Misinterpreting Me?
I was trying to help the OP save money! Sheesh!

Manufacturers of this type of product often reformulate to have lower costs, lower packaging cost, lower transportation costs, etc. But, they don't tell you the shampoo now has 14% active ingredients, instead of 12%. In fact, they may (at least those with marginal ethics) hope you continue to use the same amount.

Well, using extra doesn't make your hair cleaner. It's just wasting money.

So, perhaps that person can use a little less and at least break even.

Boy, people are so anti-everything business around here, that they can't even recognize someone trying to help.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. there are some products I have stopped buying
not because I can't afford them (now), but because the deception just sickens me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. Prices on many items at my grocer's jumped a tad, then they redecorated...
Probably to look more like the posh store 2 miles away.

Of course, prices jumped after that point.

I thought stores were supposed to take some hits along the way; not pass everything imaginable to the customers. I don't mind profits, but if they're not going to pay for their own, why bother? $2.69 for 8.5oz of Triscuits is silly when I can go to 4 other stores; get it for $2.04~$2.29. Even if it was "on sale" (TPR) for only $2.39. :eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-23-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. Just wait, it will get worse what with the drought
and the wheat crop failure. I guess they will have to skip bread when the government collects it's grocery bag to determine inflation or they could substitute cake. Let them eat cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC