OMG- - READ the "declassified" NGIC "keypoints" Santorum cited re: WMD

[npincus]

That's IT? Coulda, woulda, likely, 'reported in the press", what-if, maybe... did I say the possibility exists? This is even more embarrassing than I expected. Santorum was counting that the American public has the IQ and attention span of the average FUX viewer, and that nobody would bother to READ the thing.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

Reading from a declassified portion of a report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit, Santorum said: "Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."


http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf

[Beelzebud]

1. LOL THAT is Santorum's "smoking gun"? LOL

Geez he's dumber than a shoebox full of dick heads...

The bright side is that he is polling so low, he is sure to lose his seat this year.

[Beelzebud]

2. Isn't it funny too how Fox News gets this "exclusive" from the fedgov?

I'm sure there is no collusion there.

[The_Casual_Observer]

3. Demonstrates the bad spot that sanatorium is in to rely on something

a bullshit as this thing.

[Roland99]

4. Just like all prior claims. Shine light on it and it fades away.

[ripple]

5. The Wash. Post article sums it up nicely:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/21/AR2006062101837.html

[dogday]

6. It does not have to be true, just repeat and rinse

then repeat again... Shame on him, my Son fights in Iraq for their lies...

[zbdent]

7. Give me 15 minutes, I bet I could make a copy of this with Word . . .

hee hee hee . . .

Gee, you'da thunk that they'd have declassified something that looked like documentation of the "finds" instead of "Okay, you asked for info about the munitions. Well, here's us saying we found them . . ."

All I have to say about that is this:

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

[wordpix2]

8. "assessed to still exist" & "desire to acquire & use chem weapons" WTF?

Coulda, shoulda, woulda, most likely... :rofl:

geez, if my students came up with these "facts" to back up a thesis statement, they'd get an F.