Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Proof that the Voters' Rights Act is still needed: FL in 2000 & OH in 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 10:33 PM
Original message
Proof that the Voters' Rights Act is still needed: FL in 2000 & OH in 2004
This vote in Congress, regarding the Voter's Rights Act, is a good reason to open up an investigation into the 2000 and the 2004 Presidential Elections. The 2000 felon purge in Florida specifically targeted black people & the 2004 Ohio voter obstruction did the same. I believe there was another purge that was stopped, that would have isolated hispanics.

And yet, we have idiots in Texas claiming it's not needed, when that purge in Florida originated from data from Texas.

Here's the Texas article from Raw Story:

Some Texas Republicans don't believe racial bias exists in state anymore

RAW STORY
Published: Wednesday June 21, 2006

"I don't think we have racial bias in Texas anymore," Congressman John Carter (TX-Rep) said after House Republican leaders suddenly cancelled plans to vote on a renewal of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, according to an article slated for Thursday's edition of Houston Chronicle, RAW STORY has found.

Excerpts from the article written by Samantha Levine:

#
The change in course was announced after the Texans and other Republicans raised complaints about the legislation during the weekly House GOP meeting.

....

Among the objections brought by several Texas Republicans is the requirement that the state must get permission, or "preclearance," from the Justice Department or a federal court before making changes to voting standards, practices or procedures.

The rule was aimed at states with a history of discrimination in voting. Six states were targeted when the law was originally passed: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Virginia. Texas, Arizona and Alaska were added in 1975, when the law was expanded to protect people who have limited knowledge of English.

"It would be dumb to discriminate," said Rep. Henry Bonilla, R-San Antonio. "That is the last thing anyone is trying to do."

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Some_Texas_Republicans_dont_believe_racial_0621.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. "I don't think we have racial bias in Texas anymore,"
Edited on Wed Jun-21-06 10:41 PM by marmar
Whatever form of crack he's smoking needs to be removed from the streets immediately. He's suffering extreme delusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC