|
Why do people take Ann Coulter so seriously? Ms. Coulter exists for one reason, and one reason only. That reason is to move the national debate even further to the right.
With Coulter out there (as well as Michelle Malkin), if a Republican comes along now and is just slightly to the left of her, that Republican can now label himself as a moderate and people will just nod their head and say, “Well, he’s certainly more reasonable than that Coulter woman!” Presto, somebody that is far right on most issues is now seen as a moderate because they are slightly less of a fascist than her.
My case in point are two Arizona senators in John McCain in modern times as compared to Barry Goldwater in the 1960s. If you look at their views on the issues, McCain is clearly farther to the right than Goldwater on issues like abortion, gays in the military and the environment.
However, if you look at how the public perceives the two of them, that shows you how the debate has changed over the past 30-40 years. Goldwater was considered so far to the right that he was way out of the mainstream, and got swamped in a landslide of historic proportions in 1964. McCain, despite really being more conservative than Goldwater, is perceived as an independent maverick and a moderate because he has gone against Bush on a few occasions.
I don’t know if we should just ignore Coulter - because she has such a prominent position in the media and it’s almost impossible to ignore her - but I do know that she has helped bring the national debate a lot further to the right than it used to be. There are no equivalents on the far left that have nearly as much influence as her – Michael Moore is a damn center-left moderate compared to Coulter! And, I don’t recall Moore advocating assassination of George Bush, fellating Lenin or Mao in print, or saying that Bush has enjoyed the deaths of the soldiers in Iraq.
Just my 2 cents.
|