Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lou Dobbs comes out against electronic voting machines:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:19 AM
Original message
Lou Dobbs comes out against electronic voting machines:
"Well, coming up next here, your ballot may not be counted if you're voting on electronic voting machines. You'll never know. Perhaps neither will we. But some states are awakening to the dangers of those e-voting machines and trying to determine whether they are jeopardizing our democracy.

We'll have that special report tonight.

Congressman Mike Pence will join us. He's introducing his own illegal immigration and border security legislation. He says it is an amnesty. Others disagree. Congressman Pence will join us next.

And three popular radio talk show hosts, they'll be here. We'll be talking about the death of Zarqawi, illegal immigration, border security, such as it is, and the issues that will shape our upcoming midterm elections.

Please stay with us.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

DOBBS: Nationwide, as many as a third of all voters are expected to cast their ballots in the midterm elections on electronic voting machines. But serious questions about those machines' reliability and their vulnerability to fraud are rising. Some election officials in some states are returning to paper ballots in order to assure competence in the election process.

Kitty Pilgrim reports.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

KITTY PILGRIM, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice over): In Newark, they are using lever voting machines for a special city council run-off election Tuesday. The local election officials say they went back to the old system for this specific election because voters felt more comfortable and confident in using the old equipment. But last week, for the primary elections, they used electronic voting machines.

The New Jersey State Attorney General's Office says there were no reported problems with the primary last week, but they admit they are discussing moving to a statewide verified paper trail system in the future.

WARREN STEWART, VOTETRUST USA: The real difference with an electronic voting machine like a touch-screen machine or any of the direct record electronic machines is that the votes are counted with software. In the case of a paper ballot that's run through an optical scanner, yes, it is counted by software initially, but there's the possibility of hand counting it. PILGRIM: New Mexico has decided to move to an all-paper ballot system in the future to increase voter confidence, even though they stand by their previous results on electronic voting systems.

REBECCA VIGIL-GIRON, NEW MEXICO SECRETARY OF STATE: We were trying to accomplish uniformity more than anything in the state of New Mexico because we had all these different types of voting machine systems in the state. We decided that uniformity was the best way for us to go.

PILGRIM: According to verifiedvoting.org, a watchdog group, 26 states have legislation or regulations requiring paper ballots. And 13 more have proposed legislation but have not yet enacted it.

Eight counties in Arkansas are not using touch-screen voting in Tuesday's run-off because there was not enough time to reprogram the machines after last month's primary. But officials say they are looking into tabulation problems with their electronic machines in the May 23rd primary.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

PILGRIM: Now, some in Congress are calling for a bill that would set federal standards for voter-verified paper records and legislation that would also call for election officials to conduct random audits of the systems. And those are audits done by election officials and not the companies that make the machines -- Lou.

DOBBS: Well, I'll tell you, frankly, I'm no more reassured by the fact that some election official is doing an audit of a machine with proprietary software for which there is not a paper record of that vote cast and for which we have the ability to conduct a recount reliably and accurately. After all, that is the purpose of the recount.

This e-voting machine wave that has taken over about a third of the country I think desperately needs to be re-examined and re- examined with care.

PILGRIM: And many officials are doing that just now.

DOBBS: As you have just recorded. As always, thank you, Kitty. "

Interesting, if some dork like Dobbs can understand this, normal everyday reactionary Americans will too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. this says it all: "..not enough time to reprogram the machines.."
machines are totally reprogrammable at will by anyone with the knowhow or intent to cheat. if it is possible, it will be done.

Msongs
www.msongs.com
batik & digital art
get your pics on a shirt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. He's known about this since 2003 -
He had David Dill, Rush Holt, Bev Harris, Avi Rubin and others on his program in Summer/Fall 2003. They all told him this was a problem. It didn't make a difference then, and I'm not convinced it will matter much now. At least I'm not counting on it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. You can count on it this time, Greg.
We're in daily contact with them and they'll be covering the story every night this week again, and into the foreseeable future. VTUSA gave this thing legs for them and they're deeply into the story now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm glad Lou is taking this on. He DOES have a lot of moderate
viewers, and from some almost instant responses from the WH in the past, they pay attention to his prorgam.

This is the kind of attention we have needed ever since we've started questioning the validity of these machines. Lou CAN'T be considered a LW nut, so when he brings this subject to the forefront, he gives credibility to our arguments!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. I could not believe it when I saw it
but he was actually making the case against these machines....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wouldn't it be great if Lou got on this bone
like he has the distasteful immigration issue. Seems to me it appeals to a lot more people and doesn't make him look like a racist clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Say what you want about Dobbs,
but he's the only MSM guy thats talking about this problem. So for that reason alone i'll give Mr. Dobbs a shout out.

I do wish that KO would take this on, i believe in the past he's reported on this subject but it would be helpful if several reporters would keep a constant drum beat going until voters realize the importance of this problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lou Dobbs should have Greg Palast on to talk about NM w Vigil-Giron
Maybe she can explain the machine tapes (shown in Armed Madhouse) that fail to list John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. He only got on board when he heard that Venezuela bought the company
That is when he became so irate about our voting machines when he heard that foreign interest had a financial stake in our electronic voting machines. I am glad that he is bringing this to everyone's attention though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Exactly! A U.S. company doing dirty deeds is A-OK!
Even if it is a multi-national corporation. But a foreign country run by an extreme Left-wing dictator! OMG!!! Secure the borders NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Perhaps he is going to have Bev Harris on again?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0405/06/ldt.00.html

President Bush Stands By Donald Rumsfeld; E-Voting Threat to Democracy?

Aired May 6, 2004 - 18:00 ET

<snip> DOBBS: Coming up next, a threat to democracy. Electronic voting could undermine our system of law. She's are guest next.

"Exporting America," a small businessman in Maine. He says outsourcing was never even a consideration. We'll have his story. Stay with us.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

DOBBS: California State Senate Committee has approved a ban against all electronic voting in the November election. A vote by the full state Senate could come as early as next week.

My next guest says the use of electronic voting machines could hurt our democracy.

Bev Harris, the author of "Black Box Voting," joining us tonight from Seattle, Washington.

Bev good to have you here. How important is the Senate -- California Senate decision next week.

BEV HARRIS, AUTHOR, "BLACK BOX VOTING: VOTE TAMPERING IN THE 21st CENTURY": Very important. Basicly what will happen with that is it will make the counties able to fight against it and the secretary of state's ruling to do the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah...it came onto his radar when he got wind that Chavez
might be involved. Before that, pffft!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC