Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obscure Trade Settlement Could Create $480 Million Slush Fund for

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:36 PM
Original message
Obscure Trade Settlement Could Create $480 Million Slush Fund for
White House
The resolution of an obscure trade dispute involving imports of Canadian lumber to the United States could result in a $480 million slush fund for the White House, according to a lawyer familiar with the case.

For years, the United States has been in contentious litigation with Canada over tariffs imposed on Canadian lumber imports. Canada maintained that tariffs imposed on lumber imports to the United States violated the rules of NAFTA and the WTO. Pending the resolution of the litigation, the Department of the Treasury held these tariffs in an account which now contains five billion dollars.

The United States lost virtually every major aspect of the litigation for the last five years, and as a result, a settlement seem elusive. Then, last April, the United States and Canada reached a surprise agreement. Here’s what we know about the deal from public sources:
snip

– The agreement contains a complicated escrow system that may allow the $480 million to be funneled from the Treasury Department to the White House.

link- http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/12/white-house-slush-fund/
:hi: :loveya: :hug: :pals: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is unconstitutional.
Under the US Consitution, Congress controls spending.

Any settlement won by the federal govt against a foreing nation should go into the treasury for Congress to decide how to spend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ralps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for commenting Eric J in MN, i agree with you
:hi: :loveya: :hug: :pals: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalPartisan Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-12-06 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Which only makes it more likely
Edited on Mon Jun-12-06 07:00 PM by LiberalPartisan
When did this administration ever care about the Constitution? Congress has abrogated their oversight responsibilities - abrogating their spending authority only makes sense. These are a bunch of lapdogs cooing over the fashion sense of a naked emporer.


Sorry if I sound a little piqued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC