Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whistleblower Laws, Google, and Privacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 07:14 PM
Original message
Whistleblower Laws, Google, and Privacy
Edited on Sun Jun-11-06 07:55 PM by SHRED
I realize so-called 'whistleblower' laws are weakened in the private sector, and now, since the SCOTUS ruling last week, virtually non-existent for GOV employees.

Has anyone been harmed by Google search?
I haven't yet but there is a page that shows up where I took my employer, and our Bargaining Group, to Federal Court on a Civil Rights suit...and won.
I recieved no monetary settlement other than back dues and my attorney fees paid, this was about upholding the Bill of Rights, but that's a different story.

This got me thinking.
I would imagine that many "whistleblower" type issues make the news.
Where is the protection, for future employment, when your name is plastered on Google and many employers routinely use it to check on us?

Does having access to this info, this fast and easy, have a self censoring affect on potential people who see wrong and want to come forward?

In this 'David vs. Goliath' scenario...David's duty is getting more and more difficult.
Isn't it?


The RWnuts always squawk about "activist judges" on the airwaves constantly.
Talk about squelching those Government employees who might come forward to reveal corruption?
Well, it just doesn't get anymore 'activist' or ugly than this Conservative bench ruling:



ON EDIT:


High Court's Free-Speech Ruling Favors Government
Public Workers on Duty Not Protected

By Charles Lane
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 31, 2006; A01

The Supreme Court yesterday bolstered the government's power to discipline public employees who make charges of official misconduct, ruling that the First Amendment does not protect those who blow the whistle in the course of their official duties.

By a vote of 5 to 4, the court ruled that the Los Angeles County district attorney's office did not violate prosecutor Richard Ceballos's freedom of speech by allegedly demoting him after he wrote to supervisors charging that a sheriff's deputy had lied to get a search warrant.

Dissenters on the court, civil libertarians and public-employee unions said the ruling, which extends to all of the nation's public employees, could deter government workers from going to their bosses with evidence of corruption or ineptitude.

CONTINUED:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/30/AR2006053000463_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. That ruling is shocking on so many levels!
It vindicates obtaining a search warrant under false pretenses, tells bosses it's OK to retaliate on whistleblowers, silences whistleblowers, emboldens would be wrong doers, good thing we don't have no activist judges anymore. Now they are out and out ASSHOLES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Activist assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC