Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lessons I've Learned from the Fright Wing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:20 PM
Original message
Lessons I've Learned from the Fright Wing
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 04:10 PM by Blue Velvet
aka The Unintended Effects of the Many Misfirings from the Current (B)administration

Happy New Year, all! I’m a DU newbie (a DUbie?) of sorts, who – thanks to one of the many misfirings of the Bush regime (we’ll get to that later) – has been transformed from a voraciously-reading lurker-of-two-years to someone who just began posting last month.

And now that I’m belatedly back from my holiday hiatus (one which was still slightly more abridged than the one Congress had initially allotted themselves), I just wanted to check in with y’all and share some belated New Years thoughts - thoughts that might hopefully be regarded as good food for thought for ’06 (assuming you didn’t gorge too much over the holidays!).

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________


Here goes: Well, in my first DU post last month, I hypothesized that the Fright Wing’s rapacious desire to legalize (and/or do it anyway if it can’t be legalized) torture, rendition, domestic surveillance ad nauseum was not, in fact, truly intended to “fight terra.” Rather, the more-likely goal of these policies might actually be designed to DOMESTICALLY TERRORIZE US and thus discourage dissent in the U.S. And the fact that we are not only potentially being listened to/monitored but can then be whisked away to Uzbekastan to be tortured for something we thought we expressed in private must certainly be giving We the People a bit of pause.

However, I went on to say that, if this is indeed the intended aim of all these unconstitutional shenanigans, then the Bush regime’s plan – in my case, anyway – has backfired. After all, I once felt the need to be confined to lurkerdom due to my fear of “speaking out” and attracting the interests of the ever-popular(?) Agent Mike. But thanks to new disclosures about the Executive’s Overreach, I now realize that - through tapping into all the major arteries of telephonic and internet communications and data-mining like mad – they’ve been getting all my info for awhile now anyway. “Hell,” I figured (and continue to figure), “if they already have and are using illegal means to discern that which I already believe, then I may as well speak my ‘private’ truth out in public now!”

So their plans for oppression and intimidation seem to have inadvertently backfired by converting me from “fearful lurker” to “outspoken aspiring activist” – ironic, no? I wonder how many others out there have undergone the same transformation for similar reasons? Because for all their talk about our dissent “emboldening the enemy,” their policies have made clear that the American people are also their enemy, and – upon figuring this sad fact out – we become newly emboldened as well.

After all, as this administration continues to put a sick and bitterly ironic twist on the lyric “freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose,” then surely the time to act is now, while we still have a few things LEFT to lose (and the government is madly gnawing away at those, too – all in the name of “freedumb!”, er, I mean “freedom!”))

Furthermore, in a strange way, this regime has done me other inadvertent favors as well – and the more I am spurned by them, the more I am spurred to act in ways that seek to improve my life so I can, in turn, have the energy and health to (hopefully) help improve the lives of those around me.

A good example of this is the recent revelation I had (which led me to a resolution) regarding aspartame aka “NutraSweet” (which, sweet though it may be, seems to be quite lacking in the “Nutra to Sweet ratio”…)). I realized that EVERYTHING this administration (and their hovering ilk behind the scenes and on the sidelines) does and has done – not just the torture, rendition, and illegal eavesdropping - whenever they’ve had access to political power has seemingly served to undermine our potential for dissent. Let’s see here:

Take over the media so the electorate can (mostly) never be truly informed enough to react appropriately? Check. Decimate our public school system and education standards to the point where “the children who are our future” don’t even know that they have the very constitutional rights and liberties that are being overturned? Check. Oh yeah – and inundate those same kids with so many bleeping (literally) toys and gadgets that they don’t even care to know? Check!

Thus, I realized over the holidays, that perhaps all this oppression/suppression would also manifest itself in the corporate-produced, government-endorsed foods and beverages we consume, eh? So the fine Big Agra folks at Monsanto grease the wheels (and probably more than a few palms) at the FDA, and, suddenly, “Hooray – we’ve made this great calorie-free sweetener that is also totally good for you!” And of course Americans – by and large the biggest “something for nothing” crowd you ever did want to meet – ate it up (both the propaganda and the product) in their quaintly ravenous way.

Well, “strangely” enough, I’ve been fighting health problems non-stop since NutraSweet came on the market – a Diet Coke fiend, I soon was diagnosed with chronic Lyme disease, fibromyalgia, and about eight other maladies, some of which have been disproved and/or dismissed, but most of which I’ve continued to fight (at least the symptoms if not the actual condition) with a lot of “help” from – guess who? Come on, you know who! Did you get it? That’s right – BigPharma!

And ridiculously enough, all this time it never occurred to me that in the same way the government seems to want to terrify, distract, and otherwise dumb down the population at large, it might also have an interest in subtly poisoning the populace with help from Big Agra so that they have no energy or impetus to do anything other than slog down to the (p)harmacy to get their ever-more-expensive gifts from Big (p)Harma and then go home and plop down on the couch to watch some cable news.

Well, as I’ve been known to say around my Mormon friends – shuck that fit! I’ve finally woken up; I’ve done a little internet research on this front (conclusion: NutraSweet is scary. Monsanto, scarier), and resolved to never drink the Empire’s Toxic Cocktails ever again.

And do you know what? In the ensuing two weeks without aspartame, I’ve felt so increasingly well that I feel I can cut back on the so-called manna from Big Pharma as well!

So in conclusion: evil Bush regime, I’m on to you! As Steven Colbert would say, “You’re on notice!” And I no longer intend to continue poisoning myself while shoveling more money into your corporate coffers.

And, lastly, I have a few questions for those who’ve had the patience to make it this far into this ridiculously-long post (sorry, but it’s been awhile since I’ve been on DU and it’s all been building up!):

Do you think there’s something to my above allegations that a lot of what Big Agra, Big Pharma, and the all-new Big “Conservative” GWB “Gubmint” do is in some part designed to keep us sick, keep us down, and keep us dumb?

And – if so (or even if not) – what experiences/feelings/results have you had, if any, from weaning your way off some of the mass-produced nutrition-free empty calorie toxicity produced and propagated upon us by our Corporate Food Lords? Furthermore, what other products should I (and others) try to avoid and why?

Thanks so much to all those who made it this far into what (I hope) will be the longest post I ever type (after all – gotta worry about carpal tunnel, too!). And I very much look fwd to hearing your replies, advice and wisdom – not only on this topic but so many others – in this new year. Much love, health, humor and happiness to all – I feel we’re going to be needing as much of that as possible as we keep fighting the good fight in 2006!


edited for some semblance of brevity (yeah - I know it's hard to believe!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigendian Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow!
Whether you are right or wrong, THAT is an impressive post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Heh - thanks! I just edited it down to what I hope is a more managable
length. Now hopefully the "quality to quantity ratio" of the words in my post isn't as disproportionately lacking as the "Nutra to Sweet ratio" of the aspartame I discussed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like what you said about the whole spying thing backfiring
They sort of shot themselves in the foot there, but it seems now they must know that more of us are pissed than not, and it will take extraordinary effort to contain us.

Enter Alito: a Justice who will justify the gubmint mowing us down for security's sake.

They've always got a plan, don't they?

Welcome to DU, BLue Velvet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks for the welcome bhg! And though Alito's not through yet...
you're right that they do always seem to have a plan.

I'm just starting to realize how deeply entrenched these thugs are (and have been for quite some time). And they seem to have infiltrated almost every aspect of our society (and others) - it's like a repugnant pandemic of sorts.

I just hope there are more people out there upon whom the administration's scare tactics have backfired, who are not only pissed off but newly-emboldened and ready to take action against this insidious, pervasive and (sometimes) covert corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Some very cool writing there....
recommend solely for pleasure. And, to the pHarma, agra ...we have only to look at tobacco to see what the gubmint (love that!) sells us. While I am an imbiber of some toxic substances, I try to stay close to the source. Grow it if you can, or buy it local. And, that goes for feeding the brain as well...don't be letting toxic trash fester in the attic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks for the recommendation, stillcool!
As I said above, I hope there's at least a LITTLE bit of quality in the huge quantity of verbiage that poured out of me! Alas, brevity never was my strong suit...

And thanks for bringing up the tobacco correlation - as a non-smoker, sometimes I'm prone to overlooking the lessons taught us by "Big Tobacco" as well. And as someone who's still (probably) detoxifying from the years of aspartame abuse, I hear ya loud and clear about the festering "toxic trash" (be it corporeal or cranial). This year more than ever, I'm trying to stay as much away from polluting my body with toxicity as I usually do from polluting my brain with propaganda or empty calorie entertainment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick for (hopefully) more discussion and feedback!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sugar Free Red Bull
I started having anxiety attacks. I'm still weird about going to sleep, but I drank it hard core for about... 3 months. I started having anxiety attacks when driving or trying to go to sleep. I stopped and the symptoms remained for about 3 months - I'm finally starting to think I'm not going crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Wow - does that have NutraSweet in it?
Regardless, I've read that a lot of the sugar substitutes can be quite toxic once metabolized - aspartame is just the worst of them, I guess. And I've also read that it can sometimes take months to detoxify, but it sounds like you're just starting to emerge from that dark tunnel of detoxification and that the worst is behind you, anyway!

And I can totally relate to your troubles with sleep - I've had some of the strangest sleep symptoms the past ten years or so. Anxiety, too. But I'm optimistic for both of us that cutting off the intake of the toxins will ultimately lead to us feeling much better - even if the results don't manifest as quickly as we'd like them to...

Thanks for the feedback - hang in there, and I hope you keep feeling better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. My teenage daughter was having frequent headaches
brought her to a neurologist - he suggested cutting out the Nutrasweet (we drink a lot of lemonade and iced tea that comes in those little tubs).

Not only did her frequent headaches decline, my not so frequent ones disappeared (other than my caffeine headaches when I don't get my morning Joe fix) I never would have linked the two otherwise. I wonder what is in it that does that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Wow - so even the medical profession is catching on to the dangers of this
FDA-approved so-called "safe" sweetener, eh? That says a lot, and I'm glad that both you and your daughter have been feeling better since you cut out the (NotSo)Nutra-Sweet from your diets.

According to what I've read, aspar(not so)tame is actually broken down by our bodies into - get this - FORMALDEHYDE (yikes!) that can be stored in one's body for quite long periods of time, depending on how much has accumulated.

A lot of good info can be found at this link: http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame/

Again, glad to hear you're both feeling better, and I hope you and yours find much more health and happiness in this new year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nictuku Donating Member (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. I enjoyed the read
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RazzleDazzle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Look what they're doing to our children's education under the
guise of aiding it ("Leave No Child Behind"). It's all intentional.

Yes, much of what they're doing "to" us which is harmful is either shrugged off, ignored, or fully intentional. Health advocates have said for a very long time that the fluoridation of water is another attempt at poisoning us. Personally, I don't doubt it.

And of course putting sugar in absolutely everything, and I do mean everything, is what has made us all fat, and given us diabetes or its precursor, insulin resistance, which is a "condition" that figures into all sorts of heart and circulatory disease, high blood pressure, diabetes (as I said), cancer too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Ah, yes - good point about flouridation, too.
I have heard similar things about that. And don't even get me started about the "Every Child Left Behind" act. :eyes:

But ya know - now that you mention it - I realize that even though I've been harping on the evils of those toxic sugar substitutes, you're right: plain ol' sugar is injected into everything, too, and contributes to many of the the maladies you cite above (which in turn also contribute to the coffers of Big Pharma).

Interestingly enough, in the early 90's when I first started developing all my symptomology, I was put on a diet that eliminated nearly everything (good) there was to eat - no wheat, no sugar, no additives or preservatives or artificial colors/flavors, etc.

And what I remember most from that time is that when I went back on a "regular" diet, I couldn't believe how sweet everything tasted once my taste buds had gotten used to not being saturated by so much sugar in everything. I mean, I distinctly recall hot dog buns tasting like danishes! But we're so acclimated to this preponderance of sugar in our diets, we don't even notice how "over-sugared" everything is until we go without for awhile. Thanks for reminding me of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow! way to go blue
I think your right on track, great post! thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Very astute...
The children of the ultra-wealthy destined to control resources, somewhere between the age of 8 and 18, are given a talk by their parents that goes something like this;

"If you look at them, if you look at what they do, what they care about, if you watch their filthy habits, you know the difference between yourself and them. You are not on this earth to be petty and powerless, you are not here to live like that, to be lazy, ignorant and uneducated. You are here to control the destinies of millions. Like a shepherd, you will guide the mindless masses as you see fit to serve a higher purpose that they could never comprehend. They have chosen to be used, chosen to be ignorant, but you know things that they could never learn. You will control their destiny, you will decide how their energies are spent and they will never know or realize it. They are sheep, and you may fleece them at will."

-I've heard some variation of this from people who grew up in ulra-wealthy families on a few occasions.

You are correct, the Matrix has you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Welcome to DU...
and thank you for your insightful post. I look forward to reading more posts from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Thank you for the welcome and your kind words, ninkasi!
And I'm very glad to be here - I think I'd feel really lost in this world if it weren't for DU.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I would be lost, too...
I truly enjoyed your post, and was sincere when I said I will enjoy reading more from you. At my age...going on 63...it's not a good feeling to be lost, and to have everything you believed in growing up challenged. I will fight, though, until I can't fight anymore. I have an 18 month old great-granddaughter, and she gives me the will to continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Ah. Many blessings to you and yours, ninkasi
Edited on Sun Jan-15-06 12:56 AM by Blue Velvet
It feels so good to find so many vital and kindred minds and spirits here. I applaud you for continuing to fight the good fight, and I wish much health and happiness to you and your entire family. I'm glad you enjoyed the post, and I am definitely looking forward to contributing more to the DU community for a long time to come.


edited to add: now if only I can figure out how to get me a Conyers avatar like yours - Conyers is my hero!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Welcome to DU! Blue Velvet
Always grateful to see another DU'er, after 2004 this site was my salvation, I used
to read bleever's post every night about things getting better, it's nice to have a place
where you can wear your tin hat with pride.

Miss Waverly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Why thank you very much, Miss Waverly
And I've certainly been known to get a bit "tin hattish" at times, myself. I like to think it's due to my reflective nature... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. we should have a guide for new to DU
Let's see:
LIHOP- Let it happen on purpose; usually refers to 9-11, as in Team Bush had 52 memos
and ignored them

MIHOP- Made it happen on purpose; usually refers to 9-11, as in Team Bush had the
incident occur as part of PNAC goals

PNAC- Project for the New American Century, this is neocon dream of the US ruling the
world through its military, might makes right, US dominating Middle East and oil reserves

Neocons - Neo meaning new, Neoconservatives, the extremists who have hijacked the Republican
party

Repugs or Repukes, DU for republicans, as opposed to RW - right wing Republican extremists

Freepers - posters on Free Republic, usually huge supporters of Fox News pundits

BFEE - Bush family evil empire

Fundies - Religious fundamentalists who support a theocracy, religious rule of US government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I think that is a most splendid idea, Miss W.
And the glossary you've written here would make a great start. Actually, I can't think of much to add to this, other than our beloved tinfoil hats! Oh, and maybe AIPAC (which I'm still in the process of learning about myself, so I don't feel comfortable writing the "definition"). Anything else we're missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. one more obivious thing
Glad you picked up on the AIPAC, if the truth ever comes out they will be spotlighted.
Most folks now just surf through the Greatest and the Latest formats but if you
access political discussions through the lobby, you will see the directory with all the
posted threads, this is what DU'ers refer to when they say kicked, by posting on a thread,
it is kicked to the top or near the top even it is an old thread, this happened to
my posting, can Bush go to war with Iran w/o Congress because the reply was the latest time.

If you have any posting you like, bookmark it; otherwise it will disappear down the
memory hole and you will lose it,

K & R means kicked and recommeded (ie for the greatest page)

eom = end of memo, which means this is a definitive statement, there's not much left to say

n/t means no text, there is only the subject line as a reply

LOL - means lots of love
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Perfect!
But I thought LOL meant "laughing out loud" (although I do like your definition better).

OK, so now that you've created this excellent "start up guide/glossary" for the DU newbie (or "DUbie" as I called it), what happens next? I think you should try to add it to the FAQ, perhaps? T'would be a shame to just let it die here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Blue Velvet, I sent it to the Big Brains behind the curtain
let's see what happens

Good Luck
and
Enjoy your stay
Thanks for your suggestions
Miss Waverly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wow, that was fun!
Seriously, I think you are right on. All things we need to learn and consider. I think you are on to them. Feels good to get it out doesn't it? Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. Glad you felt that way, MuseRider!
And not only does it feel good to get it out, but it also feels good to be able to give back even just a little of the hope and humor that I've received from the DU community for so long now. I'm glad that 2006 is the year I started to use the keyboard for more than just scrolling through the threads! Thanks for helping to make me feel so at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well HELL, Blue Velvet!
Great rant! I think you may have a few points there... But IMHO, much of this is primarily "happy coincidence" for them, discovered on their merry way to getting obscenely rich and shedding all legislative restraints. (Huzzah, "deregulation" - THERE'S a smarmy word for you)

Welcome to DU, I hope you post often, and treat yourself to a nice shiny star.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Well HELL-O to you, too, anna b!
And I believe my star should be here any minute now... *taps watch*

But I definitely look forward to contributing many more posts and a few more dollars to the DU cause. Although my words to dollars ratio (oh jeez - there he goes with the ratio shite again) may be a bit skewed towards the words in the forseeable future. Alas, I seem to currently be more linguistically solvent than I am fiscally...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaSea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Great rant..
Regarding artificial sweeteners, I maintain a simple rule-
If bugs won't eat it, it's not food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Thanks, Luna - good rule! (but do termites count?) ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaSea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. Good question..
invite them for tea, and quietly note what sweetener they choose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
27. i just must say, I love the term DUbie.
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. heh - and I, in turn, love the name NuttyFluffers!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
28. You can add to that,
Lead and Mercury in our air and water...Both of those tend to work on our minds and make people paranoid and well....Rasputan comes to mind...and judging from behavior of many, I'd say pollution is having an affect too, and ** is increasing that also...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Good point, EC. You know, I've asked a lot of people from my parents'
generation whether they feel my generation had more "nervous system disorders" (for lack of a better term - haven't had my coffee yet!) as we were growing up than they had in theirs, and I've gotten almost universal agreement that that's indeed the case.

Granted, medical science has made strides in defining and diagnosing certain conditions in the past 20-30 years, but my mother - who was a teacher for forty years - says that even if there were such things as ADD and ADHD back then, there weren't nearly as many people who had it then.

So I think you're right - environmental toxicity in general has contributed to this trend. I wish there were some definitive studies on this (if there are, I haven't found any). But, again, it's hard to scientifically test/account for something that is "known" now (and measured differently) versus what was largely unknown then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
38. Welceom to DU, Blue Velvet.
Please check your inbox.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
39. I am not sure how this is managed
but I find this post to be undreadable. Not because of the content, but because, for some inexplicable reason, it does not fit on my computer screen, and thus, instead of being able to scroll down and read and read and read, I have to physically scroll back and forth for each frigging line. Sorry, I am not going to do that much work even to read William Pitt or H2Oman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Velvet Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Huh - that is strange. I take it that all the other threads you've looked
at today don't have this problem? I wonder if anyone else has had that kind of problem with the layout, too? But I agree with you - my post is long enough without having to go through that kind of effort! Well, thanks for the feedback, and thanks too for invoking the names of two of my DU heroes - Will Pitt and H2Oman; now I can spend the rest of my day pretending that I've been compared to them!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UncleSepp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
43. Welcome, you DUbie you... thanks for the LOL
I hope you have a long and happy time here! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. aspartame from Rumsfeld's company Searle
from Rumsfeld entry at Wikipedia

....

Private career
From 1977 to 1985 Rumsfeld served as Chief Executive Officer, President, and then Chairman of G.D. Searle & Company, a worldwide pharmaceutical company whose products included, among others, the oral contraceptive pill Enovid. It was under Rumsfeld that Searle got FDA approval for the controversial artificial sweetener, aspartame, which it marketed as NutraSweet. Some believe that the approval of aspartame was influenced by conflict of interest and that persons involved in the aspartame approval process were rewarded with high paying jobs or consulting positions. During his tenure at Searle, Rumsfeld led a financial turnaround of the company that earned him awards as the Outstanding Chief Executive Officer in the Pharmaceutical Industry from the Wall Street Transcript (1980) and Financial World (1981). Rumsfeld is believed to have earned around US$12 million from the sale of Searle to Monsanto.

....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC