Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA DEMS: How does Angelides match up against Arnold?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 12:27 PM
Original message
CA DEMS: How does Angelides match up against Arnold?
Is he the strongest choice in your opinion? and what do you see as his strengths and weaknesses?

Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't this thread a day late?
Westly always did better against Arnie in the polls, but that doesn't matter now. Even though Angelides was shown to have more of a struggle in the general election, CA dems chose him. I hope he can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. According to Kos, Angelides insisted his name be taken off of
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 01:21 PM by WI_DEM
the DLC list when he saw it was on there as a member (good for him) while Westly apparently (again according to Kos) was the DLC candidate. Is this your perception?

p.s.
no it isn't a day late, I'm asking what Californians consider Angelides strengths and weaknesses going into the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Angelides has the organization.
Westly self-funded and even last night was droning on about trying to build a new coalition not relying on old constituencies. I voted for Angelides and persuaded others because of the fact that Westly used a corporate and pro-business outlook rather than the populist one Angelides used.

The unions that opposed Arnold so successfully backed Angelides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. DLC or no DLC I, like many others, didn't find them to be very different
Hence, I hoped the guy with the best chance of winning would get the nom. In my opinion, that did happen in Montana and Iowa last night. The Gropinator needs to go, and Angelides has struggled a bit in head to head matchups. Hopefully now that this primary is over, dems can be more unified. Arnie has celebrity/ incumbent status, and that is tough to top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Angelides has a strong rep as an ABLE administrator. Post Katrina, that
Edited on Wed Jun-07-06 01:31 PM by blm
trait should go further than it would've. And post Enron convictions, I don't think Arnie will stand a chance without rigging machines.

And Californians are comfortable with Angelides - they've been voting him into office for a long time now - so his name recognition is higher than most officeholders. I haven't voted in LA since 98, but I still know Angelides credentials and how people trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-07-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. They will just pull the same old stuff they always do.
They will pull the old trusty "tax and spend liberals", "the liberals are coming to take all your money", "the liberals want to raise all your taxes and force abortions on your children" crap that they always do. It will as usual, go down great with the prop 13 shit heads here in San Diego.

The thing is, anyone who starts the next term here is going to have to raise taxes. They just pushed through a huge bond to pay for things that we couldn't afford, because---taxes on the upper 10 percent and corps are not high enough. How the hell are we supposed to pay off the bond now if they don't raise taxes? Sell it to China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC