|
At least for the most part.
If you don't understand how things work, and you haven't really assimilated a fact-based approach to things, you don't have to actually worry about what's likely.
I knew grad students in literature that were convinced that microwaved food was dangerous: They thought that microwaves got trapped in the food, and would be released as it was chewed or digested. They had no clue how microwave ovens worked, not even a high school understanding of electronics and quanta; moreover, they disdained 'scientific types' as fools that lacked a proper understanding of what's important in life.
On the other hand, compartmentalizing faith and fact isn't a problem. Science doesn't give a certain kind of answer, and most systems of ethics have assumptions that aren't grounded in fact, but are still grounded in some sort of belief; maybe not in a god, but in what's right and good, when all ideas of 'right' and 'good' are either simple compromises or unprovable values. To say that is flamebait, because nobody wants to believe that their beliefs aren't provable and grounded in fact, whether an Islamist or Xian fundie or a Marxist-Leninist.
But as long as you have a heavy awareness and respect for facts and for others, it doesn't much matter.
|