Do me a favor please...?

[ariellyn]

Email this to every living, breathing creature you know--'cuz it ain't gonna make the MSM "news".

Spread it far and wide.

source: http://www.blogactive.com /
Note: scroll down to "Wow"

George W. Bush's marital problems have just taken another turn for the worse. Apparently, Mr. Bush has not only engaged in an extra-marital affair with a member of the opposite sex who is also a senior member of his Cabinet, but also a member of the same sex. WMR received the following release this morning from Leola McConnell, Democratic candidate for Governor of Nevada (who has been endorsed by WMR). McConnell is a one-time professional dominatrix.

"President Bush's speech to the nation Monday. If he doesn't say he's a gay American or at the least a bisexual one then he shouldn't be making one at all. And the notion that it would be in regards to writing bigotry into our nation's Constitution is reprehensible. Too bad it isn't me doing the rebuttal because in 1984, I watched him perform (with the enthusiasm of homosexual male who had done this many times before) a homosexual act on another man, namely Victor Ashe. Victor Ashe is the current Ambassador to the nation of Poland who should also come out like former Governor McGreevey of New Jersey and admit to being a gay American. Other homo-erotic acts were also performed by then private citizen George Bush because I performed one of them on him personally.

I am the woman this website (bushssecretlifein84.tripod.com) speaks of that has been posted on the net nearly two years now.

<skip>

[Jeffersons Ghost]

1. Kicked and Recommended good gossip is hard to resist here's a 5th vote

[blonndee]

2. I'll wait to email until there's more confirmation.

Would hate to make a fool out of myself. Not saying it's not true, but I think it's best to wait.

[ariellyn]

4. I don't see why you'd wait. They lie without hesitation. nt

[blonndee]

14. And there's your answer. * I'm* not one of them. n/t

[snot]

3. Two concerns:

First, of course, I'd love it if this were true. BUT:

1) Could this be a set-up for a "Rather"-izing of liberals? What do we know about the reliability of the sources? Not just of the blog publishing the report, but the individuals disclosing it?

2) Even if it were for real, I'm concerned about this becoming a giant distraction from much more important and dangerous activities by this administration.

[ariellyn]

5. Reliabilility does not matter--did it matter with Swiftboating? nt

[snot]

7. I don't understand -- THEY own the media, so of course . . .

it didn't matter whether the Swifties were reliable, and of course it WILL matter whether our reports are.

[ariellyn]

10. First of all, this is not going to make the "news"--and so what if it

does? Let them defend it. At this point, the ball is in their court and it's still in play.

[rman]

8. We should not conform to RW standards and lie to get our way.

Reliability, and even more than that, reality does matter.

[ariellyn]

9. Who's lying? Prove that it's a lie. n/t

[rman]

13. I'd rather have it verified that it's the thruth.

The burden of proof is on the one who makes the claim.

[Beelzebud]

12. I agree. I'll not become them.

[genieroze]

6. McGreevey left office, and I thought it was wrong for him to do so.

[Norquist Nemesis]

11. This smells fishy

Karen Hughes, Karl Rove, and (IIRC) Dan Bartlett ran every aspect of Bush with a fine-tooth comb before he announced. That was part of them showing up at the base and going through papers. I have a hard time this wouldn't have been "taken care of", but who knows? I can still have hope!