|
First, the good.
when a breaking story is of national interest, they do a fair job in getting to the facts. Better than local stations, and far better than faux. they have a broad range of issues they cover, at least 1/4 of which are done accurately. It has become an international company, with poor to fair coverage of world affairs - and that is far better than most US media outlets. Lou Dobbs, at least, actually tries to be honest, even as he himself is nuts on immigration. today's news does crawl along the bottom, adding to content. Jack Cafferty manages to scare Wolf Blitzer with honest statements.
Now, the bad
In depth coverage of the slightest complex issue sucks their mourning show is News Lite, and I hesistate to mention news. Their % of ads have grown tremendously. they are more concerned with glitz than content. their pipelines contain bullshit % of initial ads. I refuse to go through that crap. They rarely do any critical analysis of White House Spin, at the same time as they hit dems hard. While being present internationally, they have become a lightweight, fluffy, "who's today's missing blond bimbo" station, while ignoring real stories of merit because there is too little blondism involved. Soledad O'Brien (that just about says it all. Is there a DUMB test they need to pass to get on the air?)
Have I been to kind too CNN? Too harsh?
|