Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"continuity of government" excercise scheduled for June 19

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 05:36 PM
Original message
"continuity of government" excercise scheduled for June 19
On Monday, June 19, about 4,000 government workers representing more than 50 federal agencies from the State Department to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission will say goodbye to their families and set off for dozens of classified emergency facilities stretching from the Maryland and Virginia suburbs to the foothills of the Alleghenies. They will take to the bunkers in an "evacuation" that my sources describe as the largest "continuity of government" exercise ever conducted, a drill intended to prepare the U.S. government for an event even more catastrophic than the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The exercise is the latest manifestation of an obsession with government survival that has been a hallmark of the Bush administration since 9/11, a focus of enormous and often absurd time, money and effort that has come to echo the worst follies of the Cold War. The vast secret operation has updated the duck-and-cover scenarios of the 1950s with state-of-the-art technology -- alerts and updates delivered by pager and PDA, wireless priority service, video teleconferencing, remote backups -- to ensure that "essential" government functions continue undisrupted should a terrorist's nuclear bomb go off in downtown Washington.

But for all the BlackBerry culture, the outcome is still old-fashioned black and white: We've spent hundreds of millions of dollars on alternate facilities, data warehouses and communications, yet no one can really foretell what would happen to the leadership and functioning of the federal government in a catastrophe.

After 9/11, The Washington Post reported that President Bush had set up a shadow government of about 100 senior civilian managers to live and work outside Washington on a rotating basis to ensure the continuity of national security. Since then, a program once focused on presidential succession and civilian control of U.S. nuclear weapons has been expanded to encompass the entire government. From the Department of Education to the Small Business Administration to the National Archives, every department and agency is now required to plan for continuity outside Washington.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/02/AR2006060201410.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. We're gonna get attacked by Iran n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, they'll prolly find Iranian passports at the scene anyway.
I hear they issue those fire-proof ones that will withstand blasts a black box can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titoresque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No we're not
we're going to get attacked by our own government AGAIN and then we'll attack Iran.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. OR, we'll attack Iran, and then get martial lawed by our own government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Don't forget the Haliburton contingency
I call first dibs on a bottom bunk! And, yes, I want a warm locale when interned in one of those $385 million camps Haliburton is ready to build on a drop of a dime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. KNR, rank this up, vote it up, send this to the top of the greatest page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. k and r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, dear. A good day to hunker down.
Note to self--stock up on tuna and powdered milk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. A little help, here.
Do you think that exercises like this shouldn't take place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I just posted what I thought was an interesting article
Edited on Mon Jun-05-06 03:33 AM by Syrinx
And it wouldn't hurt to keep this in mind.

EDIT: My link was messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. They're more worried about us than the nuclear scenario
It would be like trying to find termites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. wow
they're so brave - they start wars then go hide while we take the punch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. They did this on 9/11 if this doesn't set off alarms in your head read:
Syrinx posted a link to this article but I want to put the actual text out for all to read.
If the OP didn't set off alarms read this:

http://www.boston.com/news/packages/sept11/anniversary/wire_stories/0903_plane_exercise.htm
Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing into a building

By John J. Lumpkin, Associated Press

WASHINGTON — In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism -- it was to be a simulated accident.

Officials at the Chantilly, Va.-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in which a small corporate jet would crash into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure.

The agency is about four miles from the runways of Washington Dulles International Airport.

Agency chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees' ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman Art Haubold. No actual plane was to be involved -- to simulate the damage from the crash, some stairwells and exits were to be closed off, forcing employees to find other ways to evacuate the building.

-MORE-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's the first thought that went through my head too,
9/11 - the sequel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. bizarre coincidence my ass.
one of the starkest pointers to mihop. similar events in nyc 9/10-11 as well, iirc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Didn't Cheney work on that during Reagan's time?
Wasn't that one of his big secret jobs during the Reagan years? He was in charge of running a secret exercise to practice getting everyone out and in bunkers before the bombs hit or something like that, if I remember right.

Another example of Cheney in charge and not Bush . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yes, with Rumsfeld
here's an old post I made on the subject with some detail

I picked up this book from the library the other day, Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet by James Mann. It is a detailed account of the 35-year histories of the top six members of the Vulcans (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Wolfowitz, Armitage, Rice)--"Bush's inner circle of advisers who have a long, shared experience in government, dating back to the Nixon, Ford, Reagan and first Bush administrations." It's a little dry, but it has been interesting to read in more detail about how these people's histories are connected.


If anyone in America had the government experience to respond to a terrorist attack upon Washington, it was Cheney. As President Ford's deputy chief of staff and then chief of staff, Cheney had mastered the inner workings of White House operations right down to the salt shakers and plumbing. In Congress he had worked on the House Intelligence Committee, learning how the CIA and America's several other intelligence agencies operate. As defense secretary he had been in charge of the U.S. armed forces. Above all, although almost nobody knew it, during the 1980's Cheney had been one of the leading participants in the highly classified planning to maintain continuity of government and set up a new presidential chain of command if America was under nuclear attack.

chapter nineteen

More:


At least once a year during the 1980's, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld vanished. Cheney was still working diligently on Capital Hill, and Rumsfeld remained a hard-driving business executive in Chicago. Yet for three of four days at a time, no one in Congress knew where Cheney was, nor could anyone at Rumsfeld's offices locate him. Even their wives were in the dark; they were handed only a mysterious Washington phone number through which they might relay messages in case of emergencies... ...After leaving their day jobs, Cheney and Rumsfeld usually made their way to Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington. From there, in the middle of the night, each man, joined by a team of forty to sixty federal officials and a single member of Ronald Reagan's cabinet, separately slipped away to some remote location in the United States, such as a discarded military base or an underground bunker. A convoy of lead-lined trucks carrying sophisticated communications equipment and other gear made its way to the same location.

Rumsfeld and Cheney were principal figures in one of the most highly classified programs of the Reagan administration. Under it, the administration furtively carried out detailed planning exercise to establish a new American "president" and his staff, outside and beyond the specifications of the U.S. Constitution, in order to keep the federal government running during and after a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. Over the years a few details about the existence of this Reagan-era effort have come to light, but not the way it worked or the central roles played by Cheney and Rumsfeld... ...This was not some abstract textbook plan but was practiced in concrete, thorough and elaborate detail. The Reagan administration assigned personnel to three teams...Each team included an experienced leader, who could operate as a new White House chief of staff. The obvious candidates were people who had already served at high level in the executive branch, preferably with experience in the national security apparatus. This was where Cheney and Rumsfeld came in since they had previously served as White House chief of staff in the Ford administration. Besides Cheney and Rumsfeld, who were regulars, other team leaders over the years included James Woolsey, later the director of Central Intelligence, and Kenneth Duberstein, who worked for a time as Reagan's real-life White House chief of staff.

~snip~

... Reagan's secret program set aside these constitutional and statutory requirements under some circumstances; it established its own process for creating a new American president, ignoring the hierarchy of presidential succession established by law... ...Reagan established his continuity of government program under a secret executive order. According to Robert McFarlane, who served for a time as Reagan's national security adviser, the president himself made the final decision on who would head each of the special teams, such as Cheney and Rumsfeld. Within Reagan's National Security Council, the "action officer" for the secret program was Oliver North...Vice President George H. W. Bush was given authority to supervise some of these efforts, which were run by a new government building in the Washington area...and a secret budget...used to buy advanced communications equipment (apparently, some of the info about this secret program came about because of allegations of waste and abuses in awarding these communications contracts to private companies--Emit)


...Cheney and Rumsfeld were familiar with the Armageddon exercises of the Reagan era. They themselves had practiced all the old drills... ...except for Rumsfeld's brief stint as Middle East envoy, neither he nor Cheney ever served in the Reagan administration. Nevertheless, as team leaders Cheney and Rumsfeld played important roles in this project...Moreover, their participation in these Reagan-era exercises demonstrated a broader underlying truth about Cheney and Rumsfeld: Over three decades, from the Ford administration onward, even when they were out of the executive branch of government, they were never too far away; they stayed in touch with its defense, military and intelligence officials and were regularly called upon by those officials. Cheney and Rumsfeld were, in a sense, a part of the permanent, though hidden, national security apparatus of the United States, inhabitants of a world in which presidents may come and go, but America always keeps on fighting.


from chapter nine


Originally posted on this old thread (Another good one by H2O Man): http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=321233
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. That's what I thought.
Then why did they handle 9/11 so very badly? Hurricane Katrina even gave them warning. Hmm. It is odd afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. For folks that seem to hate everything that good, competent gov't stands
for, they sure are obsessed with saving thier horrible inept version of the same...so much for drowning it in a bathtub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-06-06 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. will bunker boy be in his little hidey hole, also?
why do I keep seeing visions of Morlocks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC