Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vanguard alone should kill Alito's Nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:30 PM
Original message
Vanguard alone should kill Alito's Nomination
The white flags of surrender are being seen poking out of Dem Senatorial offices following the four day confirmation hearings for Samuel Alito.

One more bad nightmare.

Here's the thing. Although I loathe the idea that Shrubbie is packing the court with wingnuts, it's hard to stop him since he gained the majority in the Senate. So having Sandra Day O'Connor replaced with a bushbot seems to be a foregone conclusion.

But how can Alito get away with blantant conflict of interest? It's in black and white. He owns something like half a million bucks worth of Vanguard mutual funds. He promised--in writing, and specifically in regards to Vanguard--when he was confirmed as a federal judge to recuse himself should a case come to his court that was related to Vanguard.

And that happened. A woman brought a lawsuit against Vanguard in his court. He didn't recuse himself. He didn't step aside. Instead, he cast his vote and opinions in favor of Vanguard.

All the fuss about the bigoted Princeton Alumni group, whether Alito was dodging questions, what he's gonna due if Roe v. Wade gets back in the arena, it just doesn't matter.

He's guilty of a major ethical lapse and that's all it should take.

Alito should not be confirmed on the basis of this case alone.

The fact that he probably will is so troubling I can't see straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lying under oath should do it.
Got a President impeached didn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree---that was the BIG issue and too much time was spent on
the Princeton thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. VIDEO- Attorney for plaintiff against Vanguard from today's hearing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Thanks !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opusprime Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Great clip...
that guy alone was reason to Filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. This is excellent. I will use the info in my next letter to Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. remember 1 of the many of Clinton's appointments of judges
she had a latino maid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent point! But will our reps listen or use this as justification? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. We have to make enough noise
Email, fax, call. Tell Kennedy. He seems to be the one to go to who will listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. I will certainly write Kennedy about this info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. duh!
it seems fairly forthright to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. We're so screwed! And if confirmed, I don't know what it's
gonna take to turn it around again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. If Alito's confirmed, Bush is in for life.
It'll be ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. A liar and a crook who abuses his power. Stop Alito.
Please email/call your Senators to filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Vanguard was hit as much as the others
The media is selecting the SCOTUS for us. They aren't giving people the facts on Vanguard, or anything else. The Democrats can say as much as they want, if the media reports the Republican point of view, then that's all the public believes. Can you imagine Clinton appointing a judge who upheld the strip search of a ten year old?? We've had no public debate at all, the public doesn't even know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Republicans have lost their moral compass.
Things have gotten so bad, that we don't remember what bad is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renie408 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Blatant conflicts of interest are just business as usual.
There have been so many of them associated with the Bush administration and family that I think people are starting to think they are OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lying under oath. Didn't Pukes get all upset about that a few years ago?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Dems should be willing to shut down govt if the Repukes go
nuclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. "A liar and a crook who abuses power"
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 10:00 PM by billbuckhead
Yep, that about says it all about "Machine gun" Sammy, except for the bigot part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. The dems are just as in on the game as the pugs.
If they confirm Alito, it's obvious. Dems, repukes - no core differences. The dems could've shut down the cuts to student aid, heating assistance, medicare, medicaid - but they didn't do it. They didn't shut down any of the tax cuts for the millionaires. With a very few exceptions, most of the dems are just as crooked and heartless as the pukes. Remember, it was the "new dems" clamoring for that bankruptcy bill. The list goes on and on. This is a government by and for the corporations - whom both parties serve above all else - we the people are simply serfs to be thrown table scraps at once in a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC