By Ian Welsh 2006-06-02 12:43
There are those who will tell you that the Telcos need the extra money from getting rid of net neutrality, so they can connect poor neighbourhoods.
Riiiigggghhhttt.... If extending broadband to the poor neighbourhoods was the issue, in any way shape or form, the telcos wouldn't be suing the municipalities who created wireless broadband to make them stop.
If we want broadband extended we can do it cheaply and faster than the telcos.
This is an attempt to create a legal oligopoly, and to be able to charge the sort of profits oligopolies make. Nothing more, nothing less.
Think of it as a 19th century railroad. If you've got a crop (website, emails, video, whatever) and there is only one railroad, you have to pay whatever they charge. And they will charge, on average, just enough to not drive most of their customers out of business. However, "just enough" will be enough to make sure that they get most of the profit, for the service of simply delivering it to market.
What the telcos want is to control the pipes, and anyone who wants to use them will have a choice:
1) pay whatever the telcos choose to charge.
2) don't get your product delivered in a usable fashion (can you imagine downgraded streaming video? Or downgraded real-time gaming... or e-mail that may get there... tomorrow....)
http://agonist.org/node/31096/print