Ldotters sink to new low -re: deaths in cbs news team

[Adenoid_Hynkel]

remember this is the site hannity praises in hs books as 'representing american values:
----

Reply 2 - Posted by: canuck, 5/30/2006 5:59:14 AM

Would have been much safer to stay home and just make it up as you go along...like the rest of CBS and ABC.

Reply 12 - Posted by: 49 Ford, 5/30/2006 7:44:55 AM

"...who had reported on the deteriorating conditions..."

There we have it. MSM code for: ignored the successes of our brave troops, the progress of the Iraqi military, the success of three national elections, the formation of a national unity government against formidible odds, the lack of popular support for the terrorists, any historical context which might put the cost of the mission in perspective...have I left out anything?


Reply 17 - Posted by: smokehouse, 5/30/2006 8:28:07 AM

My sympathy goes to our dead and wounded warriors on the ground all over the world. Not one shred of sympathy for a CBS news team. Sorry, but that is how I feel. If it were WWII, these newspeaople WERE warriors and deserved our respect.

Reply 25 - Posted by: Mo Gumbo, 5/30/2006 9:26:02 AM

I guess you could say her condition is deteriorating. Be sure to keep us updated on problems encountered...infection, stroke possibilities, chances for life in a coma, etc. We'll let you know when it's time to cut our losses and pull her plug.


http://www.lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=277413

[cry baby]

1. Eewww, I feel like I need a shower after reading that filth.

[benburch]

2. Waste no time on those non-entities.

The Nation has finally rejected their Kool-Aide.

[northzax]

3. damn, even half the freepers

said, basically, 'at least she was embedded, she put her money where her mouth is, taking the same risks as the soldiers she was covering'

[Bake]

4. No such thing as "new low" for them

Ldotters, freeps, etc. There is no "new low." I'm never surprised by anything they would say.

Bake

[The_Casual_Observer]

5. These reptiles are the same ones driving next to you in the SUVs.

"warriors on the ground" My ass.

[DinahMoeHum]

6. Buncha nosepickers, those. . .er. . .things.

n/t

[rusty charly]

7. um...

"any historical context which might put the cost of the mission in perspective...have I left out anything?"

is that supposed to be a laugh line? or what?

if these war mongers had any historical context about iraq, we would've never gone there and bombed that crap out of it.

"the successes of our brave troops, the progress of the Iraqi military, the success of three national elections"

what successes, exactly?

[sinkingfeeling]

8. "the mission in perspective...have I left out anything?"....Yes, you have.

Yeah, what the hell is the mission? We're going on 4 years and I'd like to know what the 'mission' of our invasion and occupation of Iraq was/is. Same question Cindy keeps asking assh**e, "What noble cause?"

[rurallib]

9. notice that none of them are in Iraq

where they too could observe Great Leader's Great Policies in reality.

[rusty charly]

10. up close and personal

[adriennui]

11. it's just my opinion but

the ldotters are nuttier than the freepers. at least in FR you'll find posts criticizing the chimp. ldots are bushbots. i've found some freepers who actually seem intelligent (misguided yes) but fairly articulate.:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:

[kskiska]

12. Ldotters are a FR spinoff

FR was too liberal for them. It's a very small group, though.

[jdeetz1019]

13. This is my favorite, "the lack of popular support for the

terrorists". What an idiot!!! They aren't running for office and I am pretty sure they don't give a rat's patootie about what anyone thinks of their actions. In their minds they are fighting for their country.