Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove's Spokesperson Responds to Waas Article

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:14 AM
Original message
Rove's Spokesperson Responds to Waas Article
Update: Mark Corallo, Karl Rove's spokesperson, has sent me this response to Murray's article:

"Karl Rove has never urged anyone, directly or indirectly, to withhold information from the Special Counsel or to testify falsely. No one has ever said or implied to Karl Rove that he intended to do so. The Special Counsel has never suggested that there is any evidence to support such an allegation. Frankly, it is hard to think of anything less reliable or less relevant than what investigators may or may not have speculated before they had started collecting evidence. Circulating such speculation now is nothing short of irresponsible."


http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014941.html#comments

CIA LEAK INVESTIGATION
Rove-Novak Call Was Concern To Leak Investigators
By Murray Waas, National Journal
© National Journal Group Inc.
Thursday, May 25, 2006

http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0525nj1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Marc Corallo is a very busy man as of late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Yes, the non-denial denials are what he gets paid for and....
it seems he is beginning to earn his pay, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I Love How David Shuster
always emphasizes that point about Corallo being paid.

*shadow government*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yep, Schuster is doing a great job in his coverage, imo
I wish more of the media would point out exactly that instead of leaving the impression that he has any credibility beyond that which a paid shill should have, exactly none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. A man in love with non-sequiturs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. LOL and so true! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Corallo protests too much? My patience is doing swell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Read Up on Mark Corallo
Edited on Fri May-26-06 08:33 AM by dogday
http://www.corallomedia.com/pages/aboutmark.html

Crisis communications:
CMS understands what it takes to navigate through the global, 24/7 news cycle under intense pressure.


National security/Homeland security/Law Enforcement:
CMS is a leader in communicating the solutions to the threats we face in the post-9/11 world.

Federal litigation:
CMS takes "lawyerspeak" and puts it in English to effectively communicate your message to your audience.

Congressional affairs:
CMS knows Capitol Hill and how to use the media for maximum effect on the legislative process.

CMS leverages extensive contacts and an established reputation with the national media and a proven track record of crafting the message, developing the strategy to implement that message and executing the strategy to maximum success that can be sustained over time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. As I said about Mark Corallo.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow if circulating truth is irresponsible, what is outing a CIA agent
worth? It must a least get a supernova explosion on the national security violation scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I am thinking the same thing
Every response he gives includes the word "irresponsible". Surely not every statement by anyone speaking to this issue for his client can fall into the area of "irresponsible", can it? He talks as if they entire journalistic world is 15 years old, old enough to make statements but not old enough to understand that they shouldn't be talking about things that the grown ups are talking about.

I call bullshit on his statements. Why isn't Luskin making any statements? Seems his silence is what's irresponsible ... or it that just plain non-responsive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. Corallo has done NOTHING to refute Waas' article.
Though technically this is a RESPONSE, what was in Waas' article did NOT claim that Rove urged anyone, including Bob Novak, to withhold information from the Special Counsel or to testify falsely. Novak did not say or imply that he intended to do so. PER SE. He said he'd protect Rove, and Rove has played dumb. The Special Counsel has never suggested there is evidence to support such an allegation, but such evidence has no import to the Libby case and must, by law, be kept secret unless and until Rove is indicted.

The rest is pure spin and does not even manage to allege, PER SE, that Waas has irresponsibly circulated claims of what investigators may or may not have speculated prior to collecting evidence. And I don't think Waas actually did.

Am I leaving anything out?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. With Bushco, one has to carefully examine everything they say. When
Corallo states that Rove hasn't urged anyone...to withold information...or to testify falsely, it doesn't mean Rove didn't withhold information or testify falsely himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. They had made the damn agreement before anyone testified.
It was hatched when they were cooking up the whole devious scheme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. You know...
Edited on Fri May-26-06 12:51 PM by Patsy Stone
The Corleones never urged him, yet Frankie Pentangeli seemed to get the idea of what to do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Rove's "crisis manager."
Mark Corallo was hired as a "crisis manager" for Rove. It has a nice ring to it. And it is more accurate than "spokesperson."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Yes, Corallo was hired in October 2005 when it appeared a crisis was
in Rover's future. He works for the defense team. (Froomkin article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2006/04/28/BL2006042801119_pf.html )

Additionally, it's interesting to note that previously Corallo was chief spokesman for Ashcroft's DOJ. He left the DOJ in 2005, apparently after Gonzales was confirmed as AG since a February 28, 2005 WaP report refers to him as "newly departed" from the DOJ. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A58188-2005Feb27?language=printer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Corallo responds to an allegation not made. And, btw, the basics of the
story is not new. I seem to recall reading long ago, perhaps at least last year, there was a report that investigators were concerned that Novak and Rove may have concocted a cover story for Rove, the content of the supposed "I heard that too" conversation that both testified to. I can't remember where I read that or who reported that, whether it was Waas or not. Apparently Wass now has a bit more meat to put on those bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Correct.
The basic story was known for at least a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Would that be an example of a non-denial denial?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh, irresponsible
Not as irresponsible as an unprovoked war. Not as irresponsible as stealing several elections. Not as irresponsible as a $500 billion deficit.

Yeah, these people are the very paragon of responsibility. That's why they feel qualified to judge Murray Waas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC