Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AT&T loses bid for a closed court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:47 PM
Original message
AT&T loses bid for a closed court
AT&T loses bid for a closed court
At issue are papers the company calls trade secrets
Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

AT&T was turned down by a federal judge Tuesday in its 11th-hour attempt to bar the public from a San Francisco court hearing today about documents that allegedly show the company's involvement in a secret government electronic surveillance program.

The telecommunications company opposes disclosure of the documents, which a former employee supplied to a privacy-rights group suing the firm, and wants them back. An AT&T lawyer sent a letter by fax to Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker on Tuesday asking that the courtroom be closed "during any discussion of its trade secrets or confidential information.''

Less than an hour later, Walker notified the company's lawyer that the request was denied and that today's hearing would remain open, said the judge's court clerk, Cora Delfin.

AT&T spokesman Marc Bien said the company's lawyers may still seek to close the hearing after it starts.

more at:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/05/17/MNGFHIT30I1.DTL
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70621-0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. GOOD! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. trade secrets?
So they're taking a page from the Diebold playbook. What a bunch of losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can the Bush....
Government take possesion of these documents in the name of national security? They couldn't try to classify them could they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC