Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DHS Does About-Face In Backing Use of National Guard to Seal Border

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:28 PM
Original message
DHS Does About-Face In Backing Use of National Guard to Seal Border
<snip>

Michael Chertoff, in those relatively calmer days before mass pro-immigration rallies, heated immigration reform politics in the Senate and cellar-dwelling opinion polls for President Bush, dismissed the idea out of hand.

“Well, the National Guard is really, first of all, not trained for that mission,” Chertoff told O’Reilly. “I mean, the fact of the matter is the border is a special place. There are special challenges that are faced there.”

Chertoff added that that it would take a huge amount of National Guard troops, that they would need new training. But couldn’t the National Guard pull it off, O’Reilly asked?

“I think it would be a horribly over-expensive and very difficult way to manage this problem,” Chertoff said. “Unless you would be prepared to leave those people in the National Guard day and night for month after month after month, you would eventually have to come to grips with the challenge in a more comprehensive way.”

more:
http://public.cq.com/public/20060515_homeland_15nationalguard.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. drats--flip-floping. I really wish the media would call it like it IS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flimsy Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. drats--flip-floping. I really wish the media would call it like it IS.
Didn't Bush cut funding to the border patrols right after he took office. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hey flimsy!
You are correct.

And welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You can start here..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hi flimsy!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. flip-flop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC