Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Alito Hearing Thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 02:57 PM
Original message
Official Alito Hearing Thread
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 03:08 PM by sasha031
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. These threads have been great
-From a longtime lurker who signed up the other day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sammy!


To DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Welcome aboard, Sammy!
:hi: :hi: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. thanks guys!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Hello Sammy
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
65. welcome to DU
We have these massive threads from time to time. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. sasha, can you edit the title of this thread to match the others?
It helps me keep the threads straight to have them numbered in the title & it helps when searching out information when they go into the archives.

Yeah, I know... picky-picky-picky.... :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. links don't work for me. i get not found.
And on 6, it linked to Latest.

HUH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. try these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
49. Working. Thank you.
What went wrong with the others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. I did it
:toast: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. OH NO
i AM SORRY YOU GUYS, i TRIED TO MAKE CORRECTIONS, COULD i HAVE DELETED THE OTHERS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's ok...
did you copy and paste from the previous thread? DU cuts off long links, try saving them in a word document and cut and paste from there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. the above links seem to work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Another ABA panel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Colleagues of Alito (judges) to speak now. n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Anything exciting happen while I was out?
I had no radio, and no-one else out in the big bad world seemed to give a flying f*ck!

They just looked at me funny when I asked if they knew how the hearings were going.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Not really
There were a few more questions from the dems on the committee -- nothing earth-shattering or tear-provoking. LOL! It was mostly more of the same: "I don't think it would be appropriate for me to answer that... I don't recall that... To answer wouldn't be prudent..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. there will be no filibuster
Feinstien is the turncoat, I called Kennedy's office and got word.

If you live in Cal. give her hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. I'm in Oregon... so I'm sure they won't listen to me...
but I'll give it a shot anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Yeah, that sounds about right
What the hell is wrong with people???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. There are no Atticus Finch's in this bunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. this guy is worse than Session, Graham, and the lot of the rethugs
all put together :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. I have never seen him express emotion....
BECAUSE HE HAS NO SOUUUUULLL!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. that's right
power, power, power and more power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. my heart goes out to Kennedy, Schumer, Feingold
who have to put up with this crap :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Yeah, no easy job
to keep a civil tongue in their head while watching this hypocritical bullcrap go down--always deferring to parliamentary procedure and noblesse oblige, when they'd like to jump across the table and throttle the liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Judge Edward Becker, Reagan appointee to 3rd Circuit
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 03:26 PM by TahitiNut
Quelle surprise.

U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Nominated by Richard M. Nixon on September 24, 1970, to a new seat created by 84 Stat. 294; Confirmed by the Senate on October 8, 1970, and received commission on October 14, 1970. Service terminated on January 22, 1982, due to appointment to another judicial position.

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on November 16, 1981, to a seat vacated by Max Rosenn; Confirmed by the Senate on December 3, 1981, and received commission on December 3, 1981. Served as chief judge, 1998-2003. Assumed senior status on May 4, 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
27. Judge Anthony Scirica, Reagan appointee
U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on June 19, 1984, to a seat vacated by John B. Hannum; Confirmed by the Senate on September 17, 1984, and received commission on September 18, 1984. Service terminated on September 11, 1987, due to appointment to another judicial position.

U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on June 26, 1987, to a seat vacated by Ruggero John Aldisert; Confirmed by the Senate on August 5, 1987, and received commission on August 6, 1987. Served as chief judge, 2003-present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. great job TahitiNu
it isn't suprising these people are from Nixon,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. can these guys throw any more syrup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Are we going to hear from any judges appointed by Dems?
none so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. no these are Nixon's world and Reagan
to anyone who has half a brain, this is such bull.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. No surprise
the 'ole boys club always shields its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. Do Dems get to throw a few anti-Alito people up there for
balance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. they are not allowed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. Is this true? Dems can't have their chosen witnesses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. I'm expecting them to nominate Alito
for sainthood at any minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. It's insane; I had to turn it off. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Me too, babylon
Can't take any more of this annointment. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. save your sanity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. I am so glad I'm not watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. Does anyone have time to research the witnesses who are fainting
in praise of Alito? He's some Elvis Presley from what I've heard so far.

What are their affiliations?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. Elvis? Did you say Elvis??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. My eyes! My eyes! It Burrrnnnsss! Get it offf!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. what a nice pic
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. can I use that
that is the grossest thing I have ever seen

you know he's a repuke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. He's a repuke? I thought he was dead! Sure,
have at it, I 'borrowed' it from the lounge.
It is gross, isn't it? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. HILARIOUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. I was without CSPAN from 12-3. Did I miss anything important?
Did Feingold bring up the list of names from testimony prep?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WahooJunkie Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Yes
He said it was troubling that it included Harriet Myers and a few others I can't recall atm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. Senator Graham by any chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Graham's name wasn't mentioned - Myers and some other names
I didn't recognize..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
42. In case you are about to throw up
:puke: :puke: :puke:

you can always go here: http://www.airamericaradio.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #42
74. ???? What's AAR got to do with that Pic? care to be more specific??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
44. My Gawd, Alito is a God
according to those judges testifying. We were all worried for nothing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
64. no he's Elvis



1 of the other DU's found this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
45. cue the crickets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
52. I just called Feinstein's office - this is what her staff said:
He said that a filibuster is "unlikely".

but I had already sent out an "Action Alert" to my local pda other local activists groups to call Feinstein's and Reid's offices.

I've spoken to staff at Sen. Reid's office to let them know that it was imperative that Alito is not seated, that DP goes forward with a filibuster and told the staff how Alito can be defeated - and that's with a 41 vote or more on the filibuster, and 51 votes or more on the so called "nuclear option".

That's how to defeat this nomination. But the party must stand together.

and then we have to move to bring on moderate republicans for the 51 nuclear option vote.

Reid's staffer said, "Ok - I'll tell him"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
53. Spector questioning witnesses now...
asked for sound-byte answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. mind dripping accolades
even from Stevens Civil Rights and Human Rights activist is dripping with this mind boggling gibberish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
57. Feinstein up
asking about rating system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #57
59.  radar alarms just went off.
she has a personal friendship and relationship with panel member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. lawyers say they are skewed, not accurate
only 8.7% of higher court judgements are reversed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
62. Hatch - boot licking....
He got emotional - now that's a really good friend.

:cry:

I love the judges!


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. He wants desperately to sit on SCOTUS.
Hatch has been pimping himself for that position for years and so has Biden...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #66
75. Ubetcha. And Hatch would be the absolute WORST justice.
The unctious, smarmy fuck would be a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #75
96. Well, can it really get any worse than this? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
67. Leahy up now...
declining to ask questions of the panel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. but what were Lehy's remarks? He said something that I couldn't
make out clearly. and Durbin just "associated" himself with Lehy's remarks. so what the hell was it??? !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Anyone hear Lehy's Remarks???? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. I didn't hear anything unusual...
Thanked the panel... but then when Durbin said that... I must have missed something!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #73
78. Yep..see below...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. The reason Leahy declined to ask questions is IMPORTANT.
He noted (1) that a panel of active judges testifying in a consent hearing ws unprecedented and (2) that should Alito be confirmed he'd be hearing appeals to THEIR findings.

This is very important. How can any Circuit Court of Appeals judge testify in OPPOSITION to Alito knowing that Alito would probably be hearing cases they decided?

This is an unethical panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. Tahiti
you so wise!



I was wondering myself earlier, why would a judge get up and say bad things about Alito, when it could ruin their career?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. Exactly my thoughts ..
I'm thinking here's this African American Civil Rights proponent Judge lavishing praises on Scalito KNOWING he's a WHITE SUPREMACISTS, yet...

so, i'm thinking what the hell is going on ?

and you just indicated what should have been more obvious to me..

That explains everything..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. This "hearing" has become a boot-licking, favor-seeking propaganda-fest.
Every reichbot on the committee is TESTIFYING, not questioning. There is nothing but spin going on with this panel in particular. It's detestable sycophancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. Sycophantic Reichbots is exactly it! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. I'd love to send these bastards a few words - the ABA???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #82
85. mutual knob-rub all the way around.
"you put that so eloquently"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. I hope Feingold Points this out..... NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. I didn't realize that Feingold had already spoken to this...
i guess i didn't understand what exactly he was talking about or hear him clearly on this point...

I'm proud of Feingold's statements..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
68. Kyl
not asking questions about Alito, wants to know if opinions are circulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
69. Dubin and Dewine no questions. Sessions up now
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 04:53 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
he is so snarky and condesending
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
79. Cornyn now saying its not unpresidented...
hearing for another federal judge... inserted list in record.

Hmmmm. he didn't say Supreme Court, said federal court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. exactly - these f*ckers are all liars! NT
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 05:01 PM by radio4progressives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
86. Coburn
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 05:06 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Is Alito a woman hater? paraphrased

Absolutely not

no, no

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. White Supremacy doesn't require Hate..
And by the way, as clearly the case, one need not be Caucasian to be a "privileged member" of the Ruling Class which is absolutely based on White Supremacy - and Wealth.

White Supremacy is also inherently Patriarchal - which is the issue.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #86
97. Coburn is.
Sonofabitch talked about how he's delivered hundreds of babies then went on to spew lies about what happens to a woman if she has an abortion. She gets depressed, she'll try to kill herself....yada yada yada. Made me so damn angry! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
87. 10 min. break, then new round of witnesses...
Like it's going to matter. sheesh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. I've been away
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 05:13 PM by sasha031
right wing witnesses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. last panel were judges still on the bench...
Alito would be ruling on their rulings if he gets the seat. Conflict of interest, and has never happened before for a Supreme Court hearing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. what a mess
:freak: :freak: :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. Appellate Court Judges Bootlicking Sycophantic Accolades
including an African American judge that qualified himself as liberal leaning, concerned about civil and human rights..

just lavished praises that were simply disgusting to listen to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #87
95. yep, looks like more of the same.."Bootlicking Reichbot Sycophants"!..NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
94. Back in Session
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 05:22 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Civil rights and Constitution panel/

I thought that was up next... Axelrod worked with him at AG office

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
98. Edna Axelrod - Says it all
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
99. Gerhardt - Constitutional law Prof.
@ North Carolina Law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #99
103. did you catch his reference to a judge that other judges revere?
something like "Harland" (sp?)

and did Gerhardt endorse Salito?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
100. This crap is not worth watching
Leahy may have been right to refuse to question the bushbots/Scalitonauts.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #100
101. I'm going to leave it on in the background just in case...
but I think you may be correct. (however, Kennedy did come back in for this panel, so :shrug: )

I'm not going to start a new thread till something exciting happens... in fact, I may nap. :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
102. Bestest of the best according to Specter
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 06:05 PM by DemonFighterLives
Lawyer thinks Scalito is beyond the bestest of the best, super duper judge. Game, Set Match. Ok, mr expensive lawyer, I will never hire your lying ass.
:argh: and :puke:
Oh intellect, open mindedness, terrific oral something :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #102
104. O My Gawed - A Truth Teller is On!!! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. and now his testimony is being shot down by the bootlickers NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
105. Just when I had lost all hope! THREAD 8 IS UP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
107. Locking. Thread #8 is over here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC