|
Edited on Tue May-16-06 07:32 AM by PATRICK
They seem to want to sneakily test things that cannot be directly asked without giving away what they are after while at the same time serving the good old news spin for making you assume these choices are both a done deal.
A scientific study of unscientific MSM polling might reveal whether it is corporate subservience to the Bush agenda, their own agenda, their fear of the public turning, timidly getting behind a new wave of opinion or simply crafted adjuncts to WH polling itself. And whether the poll is creating opinion and decisions rather than asking for them. Since they are heavily tampered with and "unscientific" of course the main goal is to present their opinion and have people fighting over which version they prefer of a lie.
In this case one might suspect whether they are testing or goading the people on commitment of troops and how tempting and acceptable it is to say "go for the high tech whatever that is and don't bother us". The predisposition of this Coup to privatize and take out the troublesome human element completely for massive and centralized technological tools is pretty plain, from voting to war to spying. The win win goes like this. Without getting to an increasingly necessary draft the human forces are stressed out and then the public given relief by taking this to the private sector and toys of mass control. The logic forced on the public veers them constantly toward making every WH disaster push toward a new WH solution. And if they want more troops they are signing on to the federal militarization(martial law) of every single deliberate failure. If they prefer the tech that will take time while the martial law blanket over America descends they have no clue what it is or how it will likely be used, also far beyond the scope of the single issue and its real needs.
And on and on...
|