Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palast's new book says NSA spying is all about election theft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:30 AM
Original message
Palast's new book says NSA spying is all about election theft
Edited on Tue May-16-06 12:43 AM by linazelle
He was just interviewed by Amy Goodman on Democracy Now.

Palast validated that 3.6 million votes were cast but never counted in '04--they were relegated to the provisional ballot pile. The telling thing was that the percentages of blacks votes not being counted was 900% higher than whites; hispanics votes were rejected 500% higher than whites; native americans votes were rejected 2000% higher than whites. Palast says Kerry won New Mexico and Ohio--150,000+ votes thrown away in Ohio alone.

NOTE: This issue is not just about voting machines: it's about putting too few machines in target communities; putting inoperable machines in suspect communities; throwing votes away; challenging and relegating votes to the provisional pile and, of course, the voting machines.

Palast says there has not been a fix to the past problems so the Repubicans are emboldened and will definitely do it again. They targeted people in '04 based on suspect addresses--many of them black soldiers sent to Iraq. Their next target is the Hispanic vote. Palast says there will be a massive increase in voting challenges in the future to suppress the vote and that the NSA effort is primarily about their efforts to "mine" and "troll"* to root out undesirable voters.

He also explained the oil/gas situation. Palast said Hugo Chavez is offering to sell Bush gas at $50 a barrel but Bush won't buy it because Chavez won't return the money Venezuela makes from the oil--he wants to build up his own country with it--but Bush wants the money reinvested for his war machine that has run up $2 trillion in debt. Chavez just withdrew $20 billion from the Federal Reserve which really angered the neocons. Palast says that's the reason Pat Robertson was advocating Chavez's assasination.

Said oil in Iraq is not reason for war. Said back in '20's big oil sat around and redlined Iraq to keep oil from flowing there because it was a threat to Saudi oil. Iraq, apparently, is not a team player with OPEC.

Chavez has more oil than Saudi Arabia according to the Dept. of Energy and that will be announced soon.

Clinton made a deal with Chavez. Bush came in and spat on Chavez's hand--even had Chavez kidnapped in 2002. Bush has drove up the price of oil from $18 a gallon to the current price while in office as a result. He says Bush's ties/loyalty lie with the Saudis and OPEC.

Palast says that he obtained three hundred pages of documents from the closed door energy meetings with Cheney and Ken Lay. Said that they rushed into Iraq not to take the oil but to control Hussein because he was jerking the market around with supply, causing prices to fluctuate wildly.


His book's title: Armed Madhouse

*-"mine" and "troll" Bush's words--not Palast's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's a hero of mine -kick/recommend
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Mine too. I met him at a lecture on his "Best Democracy.." book. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushknew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great...

...but what about NSA "eavesdropping" and all those computers Karl Rove had in the White House conference room (nine of them?) to "monitor and respond" to news coming in on the state by state elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm not familiar with that story. Please fill me in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Palast's assertion that Hispanics w/be targeted in coming elections
makes the current immigration issue althemore suspect to me. They are building a climate of fear among immigrants to scare them away from voting more than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SupplyConcerns Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds a little too eager to blame the oil prices on Bush
Instead of agknowledging the reality of peaking global production. Also, how can it be said oil was "not the reason for war" in Iraq while also saying that Saddam jerking the oil markets around was the true reason. That's directly related to oil. When most people say the war was about oil, they don't simply mean we were trying to "steal" all of Iraq's supply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Most people think we were trying to take Iraq's oil--Palast is
saying that's not so. The rest is explained in the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Another issue was that Saddam was planning to switch over
his oil sales to a euro-denominated market, which would depress the value of the dollar.
Now Iran is talking about the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yep, the bourse and Iran's attack on the dollar
we're screwed
the rich can invest in foreign currencies and foreign firms, we are stuck here on this dirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
27. my thoughts as well...
if the reason was to keep saddam from 'jerking' the markets around; then the neo-cons wanted 2 control/stabilize the market - THAT'S about oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. Peak Oil will eventually be a cause of higher oil prices, but it is NOT
now. Supplies to refineries are still constant. This is bush*'s doing, and of course, the American Petroleum Party and their wholly-owned subsidiary the rethuglican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. Here's the link to read the transcript or stream interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicknameless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
12. Day-um!
And yet, almost no Dem leaders will breathe a word about election rigging.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. Here's the website:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/15/1334249&mode=thread&tid=25

The video & text is there. His new book sounds interesting!

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Thanks for the link. Palast is heroic. Patriotic. Brave beyond words. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJCher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. applause for Greg Palast and Democracy Now
They both do such good work.

Looks to me like we'll have another stolen election. Pretty amazing: the repukes will have been able to rule for 12 years just because they've figured out how to steal elections.

It's so sickening that they do this on the backs of minorities: people who have fought long and hard for their rights. There is nothing more despicable, nothing lower.




Cher


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDemGrrl Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Kick For Palast!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
19. "not to take the oil"
Right - no shit. Like we were going to pump it all out of the ground and move it to the strategic reserve? "but to control Hussein because he was jerking the market around" No to control the oil. Hussein was not important. You or Palast are downplaying the role of oil here. Oil was and is the whole focus of this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Yes, but it's the price of the oil he is talking about.
Mission Accomplished means $3 per gallon.

And the same goes for Chavez. That's what the kidnap was about. And we can bet it's not over. Chavez is totally screwing the Bush family adminitration's goal of high gas prices.

It does seem odd. But it makes the most sense of anything I've heard yet. No post war planning. Going in and totally messing up a country. The code of Hammerabai (totally wrong spelling) was destroyed, all while the US army guards stood at the doors of the Ministry of Oil.

But I believe the operation was all designed to slow the flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. I couldn't finish The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.
I got so PISSED reading it at night that I had trouble sleeping. Really. Reading DU can do that too, with all the bad news articles, but at least you don't feel all alone when you hear the bad news. Palast is THE BEST investigative news journalist on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. This will never go away. The more this country moves forward,
the more people are convinced that Bush stole those two elections. And this isn't going to be like Kennedy's "magic bullet" theories which were left to conjecture because only a few were allowed to know what was going on and it was kept a secret. The truth is, that it took many, many people to steal those elections and someone will talk, and someone has evidence. And as soon as the Republican dynasty dies, we're going to hear all about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chomp Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
22. The truth about Iraq
Palast is 100% correct about oil & Iraq and I wish more people would understand it.

The US doesn't mind PAYING for oil. They don't need or want to "steal" it in a literal sense. After all, they pay the Saudis for it no problem.

No, what they want is a STEADY, UNCOMPLICATED, UINTERRUPTED supply of oil, and Saddam (and Chavez) was a threat to that.

If one thinks about the US policy on Iraq with this in mind, it makes more sense. They are not stealing the oil, merely seeking to control the supply.


....


On voting: why are people wasting time pondering central tabulating machines (or whatever) stealing elections under Rove's control, when there is a REAL - and shocking, shocking, shocking - conspiracy right here:

"it's about putting too few machines in target communities; putting inoperable machines in suspect communities; throwing votes away; challenging and relegating votes to the provisional pile"


Erm...that is fraud! You don't need any more of a CT than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I am also glad he pointed out that security flaws
with the voting machines are only a small part of the problem. Many have become so focused on that problem that they ignore the fact that it is easier to disenfranchise voters in other ways, and the pubs are very aggressive in that pursuit. It is a big picture thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
24. It's about controlling reporters, silencing whistle-blowers and suppressin
dissent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
25. I wish SOMEONE would make the obvious connection ChoicePoint &
Global Information Group, Ltd., headed by Ben H. Bell, IIIrd, offshored to the Bahamas.

Even the WashPost's Robert O'Harrow comes close but doesn't follow the cookie crumbs to their inevitable destination

Bahamas Firm Screens Personal Data To Assess Risk
Operation Avoids U.S. Privacy Rules

by Robert O'Harrow Jr.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, October 16, 2004; Page A01

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36853-2004Oct15.html

Simply read O'Harrow's article and combine the Palast article on ChoicePoint and VOILA !, you have the TIA offshore, privatized, and out of oversight and DOJ jurisdiction. The Republican company then has your records and the ability to terrorize domestic 'enemies of the state' (read progressives, Greens, Democrats, who speak up about this administration) AND the ability to suppress whistleblowers and the media from the inside.

Worse than Watergate...worse than the SS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojowork_n Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. All on the same page on this?
I've been following the reports of election fraud in 2004, since the first discrepancies between the exit polls, and the 'actual totals'(?)

Besides Greg Palast, these guys in Ohio:

http://www.freepress.org/index2.php

and Brad:

http://www.bradblog.com/

have been the most dogged in pursuing the truth.

Am I missing anybody?

Is there more?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. ....Global Information Group Ltd, in the Bahamas...?
NSA and TIA, offshore, outsourced. Did Congress approve and fund ? Constitution... anyone ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
30. Total Information Awareness...and election theft. Q.E.D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojowork_n Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Quo Est Demonstratum?
I think you won't have any trouble at all convincing those
folks who love a good conspiracy every time the topic is
brought up:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2004/031104votefraud.htm

But true, or not, it's going to take a Blogger Avalanche of
Rather-gate proportions to bring this to the public's
attention, let along 'prove' it.

...Then again, Rather-gate was something initially starteed by
right-tard, wing-nut freepers, unwilling to believe ill of their
Dim-witted Dubya. Then it was picked up by Fox News, and echhoed
by the chorus of Usual Media Suspects, who held their collective
breath and turned blue until Rather resigned.

So, how's about kicking this topic around for a while?

People, link to other reports. Anybody, everybody. Get
something going here.


Like this:

www.waynemadsenreport.com

Wayne covered this at the end of last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Palast in "Khan Job" article mentions NSA Pre 9-11 'policy shift'
Edited on Tue May-16-06 10:50 PM by EVDebs
and at simultaneous time the NSA begins an Operation FirstFruits internal investigation program...hmmm. Then the domestic spying begins in earnest. I ain't got to show you no stinking badges.

Khan Job
www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=312&row=0

and this from Wayne Madsen

""December 28, 2005 --
The journalist surveillance program, code named "Firstfruits," was part of a Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) program that was maintained at least until October 2004 and was authorized by then-DCI Porter Goss. Firstfruits was authorized as part of a DCI "Countering Denial and Deception" program responsible to an entity known as the Foreign Denial and Deception Committee (FDDC). Since the intelligence community's reorganization, the DCI has been replaced by the Director of National Intelligence headed by John Negroponte and his deputy, former NSA director Gen. Michael Hayden.
Firstfruits was a database that contained both the articles and the transcripts of telephone and other communications of particular Washington journalists known to report on sensitive U.S. intelligence activities, particularly those involving NSA. According to NSA sources, the targeted journalists included author James Bamford, the New York Times' James Risen, the Washington Post's Vernon Loeb, the New Yorker's Seymour Hersh, the Washington Times' Bill Gertz, UPI's John C. K. Daly, and this editor , who has written about NSA for The Village Voice, CAQ, Intelligence Online, and the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC).
In addition, beginning in 2001 but before the 9-11 attacks, NSA began to target anyone in the U.S. intelligence community who was deemed a "disgruntled employee."" ...

http://www.oilempire.us/nsa.html

""More on Firstfruits. The organization partly involved in directing the National Security Agency program to collect intelligence on journalists -- Firstfruits -- is the Foreign Denial and Deception Committee (FDDC), a component of the National Intelligence Council. The last reported chairman of the inter-intelligence agency group was Dr. Larry Gershwin, the CIA's adviser on science and technology matters, a former national intelligence officer for strategic programs, and one of the primary promoters of the Iraqi disinformation con man and alcoholic who was code named "Curveball." Gershwin was also in charge of the biological weapons portfolio at the National Intelligence Council where he worked closely with John Bolton and the CIA's Alan Foley -- director of the CIA's Office of Weapons Intelligence, Nonproliferation, and Arms Control (WINPAC) -- and Frederick Fleitz -- who Foley sent from WINPAC to work in Bolton's State Department office -- in helping to cook Iraqi WMD "intelligence" on behalf of Vice President Dick Cheney and Scooter Libby. In addition to surveilling journalists who were writing about operations at NSA, Firstfruits particularly targeted State Department and CIA insiders who were leaking information about the "cooking" of pre-war WMD intelligence to particular journalists, including those at the New York Times, Washington Post, and CBS 60 Minutes.

The vice chairman of the FDDC, James B. Bruce, wrote an article in Studies in Intelligence in 2003, "This committee represents an inter­agency effort to understand how foreign adversaries learn about, then try to defeat, our secret intelligence collection activities." In a speech to the Institute of World Politics, Bruce, a CIA veteran was also quoted as saying, "We've got to do whatever it takes -- if it takes sending SWAT teams into journalists' homes -- to stop these leaks." He also urged, "stiff new penalties to crack down on leaks, including prosecutions of journalists that publish classified information." The FDDC appears to be a follow-on to the old Director of Central Intelligence's Unauthorized Disclosure Analysis Center (UDAC). ""

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/2005_12181231.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kick(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raysr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. I read that and it makes perfect sense!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
33. This is how Rehnquist made his bones
As some sort of young punk judge, he would sit at polling booths and challenge every single Hispanic voter, but no white ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. Absolutely. Everything BushCO does is to hold onto power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. Can somebody PLEASE impeach Bush now?
I'm want him impeached noowwwwwww!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
37. Answers my questions....thanks. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. Here are some stats from Armed Madhouse:
-Nine out of 10 uncounted votes in New Mexico were cast by non-Anglo voters.

-In NM precincts with a population of more than 75% Hispanic, the vote loss was 900% higher than in 75% white precincts.

-7.1% of high majority Hispanic Precincts recorded "NO-VOTES" for president in NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
39. Palast is 100% credible! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-17-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
42. kick for anybody who missed it/ nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC