Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buh-Bye Posse Comitatus? Bush Weighs Deploying US Guard to Border

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:35 PM
Original message
Buh-Bye Posse Comitatus? Bush Weighs Deploying US Guard to Border
Is THIS why he has been talking-up immigration? So he can federalize the US National Guard and use them to control people on US soil?

Is THIS just distraction from the Rove indictment?

Is THIS activation of the detention camps - fill them with "illegal immigrants" and if a few political opponents get mixed in who will be able to tell...?

Yes! I am paranoid - a cornered beast fights.

Bush Weighs Deploying Guard to US Border

By Lolita C. Baldor
The Associated Press

Saturday 13 May 2006

Washington - Once again the Bush administration is turning to the military to help solve a domestic problem. But instead of hurricane aid or preparations to cope with avian flu, the Pentagon is being asked to possibly provide thousands of National Guard troops to shore up the U.S. border with Mexico, as part of President Bush's effort to gather support for an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws.

<snip>

The president was expected to reveal his plans in an address Monday at 8 p.m. EDT. It will be the first time he has used the Oval Office for a domestic policy speech - a gesture intended to underscore the importance he places on the divisive immigration issue.

<snip>

As discussions among the White House, the Pentagon and the states continued on how the military could be used to secure the southern border, defense officials said that states want the federal government to pick up what will be a significant tab for the increased security. Officials had no estimates on that cost.

Bush's speech Monday night is intended to build support for broad immigration overhaul by taking substantive steps to secure the border. His focus on the military echoes statements he made after Hurricane Katrina, saying the military may need to play a stronger role in disasters. He also later suggested he would consider using the military to enforce a quarantine in the event of a bird flu pandemic.

<http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/051306X.shtml>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's a simple work-around to Posse Comitatus.
Put the Guard units under state control and it doesn't apply.

(if I'm wrong about this, somebody please explain it to me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But could he use them in a coordinated way if they were under state
control?

This article caught my attention because I am aware of two other instances in which federalization of the Guard came up:

1. Jeb Bush federalized the Florida Guard the week before 9/11

2. When Katrina hit * tried to get the Governor of Louisiana to allow him to federalize the guard. She (Blanco) would not allow it.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. why did jeb federalize them before 9/11? did he know
something his brother knew but we didn't?

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I don't know -- I just learned it today in this 9/11 video...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I don't see why not...it's just border patrol.
No real "coordination" needed. "See that line? Don't let anybody cross it." Seems simple enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. People can apply for entry under various categories
To come in legally. Believe it or not, it is possible to enter the US legally. Someone makes that determination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. i believe you are correct. i don't think posse comitatus
applies to the guard, anyway. i think the guard is usually under state control but i don't know how that works if they go to a state other than the one where they are stationed.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The Guard IS usually under state control (unless they're federalized)
...which, obviously, has been done at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The National Guard has been used to do a lot of dirty work in the past
and it continues today, usually in exactly the fashion you describe.

They've done union busting:

A strike lasting over one and one-half years, the creation of mass picket lines at Hormel, the deployment of National Guard troops to break the pickets, the arrest of hundreds of strikers, and job loss for more than a thousand.

http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2000/0900rachleff.html

And removal of "undesirables":
National Guard in midnight mass evictions/detentions of Katrina survivors in NO hotels
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/02/333833.shtml

Kent State, May 4, 1970: America Kills Its Children
Twenty-five years ago this month, students came out on the Kent State campus and scores of others to protest the bombing of Cambodia-- a decision of President Nixon's that appeared to expand the Vietnam War. Some rocks were thrown, some windows were broken, and an attempt was made to burn the ROTC building. Governor James Rhodes sent in the National Guard.

http://www.spectacle.org/595/kent.html

It is a kind of work-around for Posse Comitatus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. My point exactly. Posse Comitatus wouldn't be broken, because it wouldn't
apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. And He's Going To Patrol With Whom and What???
Besides using the National Guard as his private militia in Iraq to protect his beloved profiteers and contractors, this asshat has destroyed the preparedness and morale of the Guard.

Besides the continued "extended stays" and other games that have trapped Guardsmen into the Iraqi fiasco beyond what any human should be forced to endure, this screw has had many of these units leave their equipment behind in Iraq...with little being replaced. What are these guardsmen gonna do? Rent Toyota trucks and borrow automatic weapons from the Minutemen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Humor_In_Cuneiform Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Governor Napolitano of AZ is welcoming their presence, unlike
the presence of the Minutemen.

I am not sure how it works with the guard, who controls them, state vs Feds.

Wait, the Prez should know. He was in the Air National Guard, or NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. How about the other way around - Rove a distraction for detention camps?
border-sealing and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Geez... you're making me paranoid
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Veterans of the Iraq War agree with you that it's a distraction
Edited on Sat May-13-06 06:36 PM by Ms. Clio
IVAW applauds the strength and courage of undocumented immigrants!

"In the name of human dignity and rights, Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) proudly stands in solidarity with the masses of undocumented immigrants as immigration policy persists on rearing its hypocritical head. As veterans who signed enlistment contracts and accepted commissions to defend the Constitution of the United States, we see clearly the racism inherent in the existing immigration policy. We have served with, and many of us are, the children of undocumented immigrants who are being feverishly recruited to protect the country against all enemies, foreign and domestic. IVAW knows that an escalating proportion of the military lives sacrificed and taxes paid are coming from undocumented immigrant families, even while those fathers, mothers, sisters and brothers are being denied the privileges of citizenship and the dignity of justice.

We, the members of IVAW, still hold these truths to be self-evident, that all are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. IVAW seeks an end to our nation's turn toward more racist immigration, military recruiting, and taxation policies. IVAW applauds the strength of courage and character of undocumented immigrants in the ongoing struggle for justice.
-- Iraq Veterans Against the War
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. I heard the guard wasnt subject to posse comatatus
I dont know one way or the other but thats what I heard on a CSPAN show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-13-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Posse comitatus is the law that the President cannot use US Troops
to control US citizens on US soil. If the guard is federalized then the President does control them and can break the posse comitatus law.

If the guard remains under the control of the governor of the state then posse comitatus isn't an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think you can say it is gone already
quote.........
Has * repealed Posse Comitatus Act?
quote.......
Several parts of the Defense Department are building large databases of information from sources such as local police, military personnel and the Internet, and in doing so, the military is edging toward a sensitive area that has been off-limits to it since the 1970s: domestic surveillance and law enforcement, according to the report.
end quote.......
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-04/28/content_44...
quote.......
President George W. Bush has signed executive orders(not true.....BUT!) giving him sole authority to impose martial law, suspend habeas corpus and ignore the Posse Comitatus Act that prohibits deployment of U.S. troops on American streets.
end quote........
http://landscape.blogspot.com/2006_01_15_landscape_arch...
You should know they circumvent anything
to not get Congressional approval
quote.........
A Washington Post article last Sunday “Rumsfeld OKs wider anti-terror role for Military”, exposed another frightening part of Rumsfeld’s “transformative” vision. Following the next terrorist attack on American soil, Rumsfeld plans to deploy “elite Special operations troops” to conduct military operations in countries outside of war zones. Under the secretary’s direction, 53,000 paramilitaries and Green Berets will be released into sovereign nations in violation of international law, conducting renditions, assassinations, sabotage, and acts of piracy. Rumsfeld’s plan abandons all prior constraints on the military and converts the entire world into a “free-fire” zone.

There’s no doubt that Rumsfeld’s malignant strategy encompasses the American “homeland” as well. It was Rumsfeld who pushed the Posse Comitatus law towards extinction by setting up NorthCom, a military command post within the United States. This creates the possibility that future military operations will target the American people, a threat which was anticipated by the founding fathers. Under new legislation the military is free to spy on American citizens, deploy mercenaries to natural disasters, and, in the event of a terrorist attack, arrest citizens without charges.
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_mike_whi_060429...

Isn't it funny this has been going on for 3 years!
http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/pcomitatus.cfm
end quote.......


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northamericancitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-14-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Is Canada next?
I don't want to see thousands of American soldiers at our border.

This is freaking me out.

nac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC