Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawsuit targets voting machines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 08:56 AM
Original message
Lawsuit targets voting machines
A group is going to court to try to prevent the use of two types of electronic voting systems being acquired by most Arizona counties for use by disabled voters.

Voter Action, a Berkeley, Calif.-based not-for-profit, said the lawsuit it planned to file today in Maricopa County Superior Court would challenge the security and reliability of Diebold Election Systems and Sequoia electronic voting machines and contend they don't accommodate the needs of voters with a broad range of disabilities.

While most Arizona voters will mark paper ballots for reading by optical scanning devices, the Diebold and Sequoia machines are two of three touch-screen machines being acquired by counties to comply with a federal law requiring that each polling place have a means for disabled voters to cast ballots without assistance

The lawsuit will name Secretary of State Jan Brewer and some county election officials as defendants, Voter Action said.

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0510votingmachines0510.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. RECOMMENDED (I am yelling)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-12-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is great, but where is Elections Systems and Software (ES&S)??
It's musical electronic machines if we don't address that it is ALL the machines that are unsuitable for elections because they all demand software (and hardware) that can be both programmed and manipulated to change votes and the data is OWNED by the private companies who own the machines!

Its about as dysfunctional as a system can get.

Remember, its NOT just Diebold. That is just one of the many spokes on a very broken wheel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC