|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:10 PM Original message |
If Nancy Pelosi knew about this eavesdropping on America...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. agreed, 100 percent.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
2. Aren't they required to keep these briefings secret? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xray s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Not if it's illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:14 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Yes. Don't tell anyone we robbed the bank and killed the teller.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. THe Nazi defense resulted in hangings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. If they spoke, they would have to step down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. If they'd spoken up Bush might have backed down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. They would have been heroes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Some people aren't meant to be heroes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
3. Pelosi and Rockefeller knew, but were sworn to secrecy IIRC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. fucj this secret cya/"signing statement" bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. They swore to protect the Constitution not the GOP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
27. THANK YOU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:34 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. No, no, no. Can't be held to being AN ACCESSORY to a CRIME. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not even the Senate Intelegence committee knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. Pelosi would be in jail if she had told |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Then all the more reason she should have done it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. Thank you, dsc. I recall that as well, despite those trying to bite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:23 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, Margaret Fuller |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. That's not so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dsc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. Is she a lawyer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. She's a citizen, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. They took a job that might require patriotism above and beyond |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. the choice is silence or refusal of any briefings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. I am also, and it's not a reason-again-to trash a Dem. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
9. I don't know if she knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
10. I go back to what I said Saturday. She's a dunce. She |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
magellan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
11. We need the names of those who were silent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
14. Feingold is also on the Intelligence and Judiciary Committees... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
30. Sen. Feingold today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. That's good to hear... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
17. i agree -- No way should this be considered acceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
20. Oh For God's Sake Leave Nancy Alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. She's incompetent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. She Isn't By A Long Shot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. "... courageous " ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exultant Democracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 09:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
42. I guess I'm just not Partisan enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:28 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. This is serious shit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #20 |
32. That's YOUR opinion. And, BTW, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. If You Don't Know That Yourself Already, Than I Think Answering The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. So you think she should keep her position even if she knew... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OldLeftieLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
21. They took an oath to uphold and defend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-11-06 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
43. What if on D-Day our soldiers wouldn't have gotten off the landing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC