Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seems on 09/12/01 Rummie was very concerned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:36 PM
Original message
Seems on 09/12/01 Rummie was very concerned
about making sure people didn't leak classified information.

Doesn't this seem to be an odd thing to fixate on in your first public statement the day after the worst attack in US history?

Rummie briefly expresses condolences and thanks and then launches into this little tirade. Maybe Rummie had a lot to hide?


September 12, 2001

DoD News Briefing - Secretary Rumsfeld

<snip>

Finally, I'd like to say a word or two to the men and women in the defense establishment, most of whom deal with classified information. Since the end of the Cold War, there's been a relaxation of tension, and the -- it's had a lot of effects. It's led to proliferation. It's led to the movement towards asymmetrical threats, as opposed to more conventional threats.

One of the other effects has been it has had an effect on how people handle classified information. And it seems to me that it's important to underline that when people deal with intelligence information and make it available to people who are not cleared for that classified information, the effect is to reduce the chances that the United States government has to track down and deal with the people who have perpetrated the attacks on the United States and killed so many Americans.

Second, when classified information dealing with operations is provided to people who are not cleared for that classified information, the inevitable effect is that the lives of men and women in uniform are put at risk because they are the ones who will be carrying out those prospective operations.

And I -- this is a message really for all the men and women in the United States government who have access to classified information. It seems to me that when they see or learn of someone who is handling classified information in a way that is going to put the lives of the men and women in uniform at risk, they ought to register exactly what kind of a person that is; it's a person who's willing to violate federal criminal statutes, and willing to frustrate our efforts to track down and deal with terrorists, and willing to reveal information that could cause the lives of men and women in uniform.

http://www.dod.gov/transcripts/2001/t09122001_t0912sd.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great Rummie quote...
"And I -- this is a message really for all the men and women in the United States government who have access to classified information. It seems to me that when they see or learn of someone who is handling classified information in a way that is going to put the lives of the men and women in uniform at risk, they ought to register exactly what kind of a person that is; it's a person who's willing to violate federal criminal statutes, and willing to frustrate our efforts to track down and deal with terrorists, and willing to reveal information that could cause the lives of men and women in uniform."

Who'd have though just a few years later, he'd be a part of the pack to out a NOC agent. How do you spell hypocrite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You noticed
He accuses and intimidates people for the very crimes he plans to commit himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. And two days earlier he announced the Pentagon had lost track of $2.3T
"According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted.


http://benfrank.net/patriots/news/national/pentagon_missing_trillions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Therefore if you know anything....
....about what REALLY happened yesterday.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC