Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carter's CAFE Standards would have made us foreign oil independent by 1986

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Amy6627 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:55 PM
Original message
Carter's CAFE Standards would have made us foreign oil independent by 1986
http://www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/kennedy.shtml

Better Gas Mileage, Greater Security

Kennedy shares how a small investment in conservation, implementing CAFE standards, would quickly reduce American demand for oil and our dependency on foreign oil.

By ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.

Note: Shel Horowitz's book, Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First, contains a great deal of other information about the interplay of marketing and social change, and ways to move a business toward both environmental and economic sustainablity.

<snip>

According to a recent report by Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, if the United States had continued to conserve oil at the rate it did in the period from 1976 to 1985, it would no longer have needed Persian Gulf oil after 1985. Had we continued this wise course, we might not have had to fight the Persian Gulf war, and we would have insulated ourselves from price shocks in the international oil market. Fuel efficiency is a sound national energy policy, economic policy and foreign policy all wrapped into one. Every increase of one mile per gallon in auto fuel efficiency yields more oil than is in two Arctic National Wildlife Refuges. An improvement right now of 2.7 miles per gallon would eliminate our need for all Persian Gulf oil!

Yet the Republican Congress in 1995 made it illegal for the Environmental Protection Agency even to study higher CAFE standards. The result is that America now has the worst energy efficiency in 20 years.

If Congress is serious about ensuring our national security it should immediately pass legislation to raise fuel economy standards to 40 miles a gallon by 2012 and 55 by 2020. This would give automakers ample time to adjust their production. In the meantime, Congress should close the sport utility vehicle loophole by holding S.U.V.'s and minivans to the fuel economy standards for cars; automakers have the technology now to achieve this. Along with the other benefits, higher fuel economy standards could bring increased demand for efficient cars, leading to an increase in motor- vehicle-related jobs. We can also substantially cut gasoline consumption by requiring tire manufacturers to sell replacement tires that are as friction-free as tires on new cars.

<snip>

http://www.frugalmarketing.com/dtb/kennedy.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. But, but . . . I live at the end of a dirt road, and it snows here, and I
have to carry all these llamas, and . . . Waaaah! I need my Pigmobile!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...........
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The absolute last thing I'd want on my car is "friction-free" tires.
Edited on Thu May-11-06 02:10 PM by TahitiNut
That's one of the stupidest abuses of language I've heard in a long, long time.

Note: "Rolling resistance" is NOT the same thing as "friction."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. What? You don't like skating or...
hydroplaning on dry pavement? You're no fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Let's put "friction-free" tires on Junior's bicycle.
Edited on Thu May-11-06 03:36 PM by TahitiNut
Wait!?! Maybe that's what happened to him?!

Actually, I'd rather have a "fiction-free" Presidency than "friction-free" tires. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is THE talking point re dependence on foreign oil/high gas prices
It counters the pub's ridiculous talking point that blames environmentalists for the current situation. It also exposes their hard-on for drilling in Alaska as just another give away to big-oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. and the flip side of Carter's plan....
The US automakers would probably be in BETTER shape now.. They whined & cried about cafe standards back then, but if they had been working on improving all these years, they would not be up against the wall now..

Back then there was little foreign pressure in the car market.. It STARTED then because the US auto makers refused to get busy ..

I still remember when a coworker drove all the way to Chicago to get a SUBARU.. Everyone who worked at the bank went outside (not all at the same time :)..) to look at her little "toy car"..No one even knew how to pronounce the name..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. I love Jimmy AND JFKjr
thanks for the op
k
r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. There's that "Persian Gulf oil" conditional/weasel wording
Would we have been independent of Venezuelan oil? Nigerian oil? Mexican oil? Canadian oil?

Persian Gulf oil largely goes to other countries than the US. We would still be consuming a lot of the world's oil production, driving demand, and making the Persian Gulf strategically important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amy6627 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't know the answer to your question, but keeping out of middle
eastern oil is a great start!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC