Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A question about the phone records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:11 PM
Original message
A question about the phone records
AT&T is part of a GSM network with their Cingular brand. Other phone companies rent their network if I am correct to provide their own service. So exactly how does this work? Does anyone in that GSM network (including Cingular subscribers) become the victims of this records handover since AT&T owns the networks?

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a painful one to consider...
I mean, the way I'm reading it, AT&T wouldn't even have a right to tell the other phone companies renting their network that this is going on; the NSA would swear them to secrecy in the course of making the classified contract. After all, if state secrets privilege applies to a court case against AT&T over this (supposedly, anyway), certainly it would imply that AT&T has no more right to tell other telcos about it than it does to tell customers about it. At least, according to this covenant which has no Attorney General waiver, no FISA court approval, etc etc...

Kind of a hardcore technical question too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The reason I ask is..
Cingular brags of 200 million subscribers on "their network", but sharing that network is US Cellular, T Mobile and a TON of other local companies (such as Einstein PCS in Wisconsin)....

We're talking most of America is on this one network.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Indeed we are talking about most of America just right there
That's the scale we're talking about today. All Americans may not be terrorists, but they are *potential* terrorists, and are being treated as such by a suspicious government feeling entitled to this data without the need for judicial review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mccoyn Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-11-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And even the few people who arn't can still be monitored.
If 90% of phone numbers are being monitored, then 99% of phone calls (assuming two people on each) are being monitored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC