Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-abortion crowd sets its sights on birth control

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:14 PM
Original message
Anti-abortion crowd sets its sights on birth control
Anti-abortion crowd sets its sights on birth control
Scripps Howard News Service

(SH) - It's no secret to those who follow Washington politics that birth control has been "next on the list" of anti-abortion, religious conservatives. Following the enthronement of President Bush's Victorian coterie in 2001, their top priority - an imposition of "everything but" a ban on abortion - has been accomplished in five short years. Now there's undeniable proof that abortion was not the home run they longed for, but more tantamount to first base in a long-range plan to ban birth control, too.

First, the widely maligned Alan Guttmacher Institute - widely maligned by religious conservatives, that is - issued a report showing the economic divide disproportionately foists more unplanned pregnancies on poor women, while simultaneously denying them access to abortion. Courtesy of the so-called Hyde Amendment, which bars federal funds for abortion, and the abstinence-only crowd, women living below the poverty line are now four times more likely than affluent women to experience unintentional pregnancy. In addition, The Washington Post informs us that 50 percent more poor women gave birth in 2001 than in 1994, while the birth rate decreased among affluent women.

The Guttmacher data only documents what happened until the year the Victorian coterie took over in Washington, including national policy on birth control. The New York Times this past weekend chronicled what has happened since. "Many Christians who are active in the evolving anti-birth-control arena state frankly that what links their efforts is a religious commitment to altering the moral landscape of the country. In particular, and not to put too fine a point on it, they want to change the way Americans have sex. Dr. Stanford, the F.D.A. adviser on reproductive-health drugs, proclaimed himself 'fully committed to promoting an understanding of human sexuality and procreation radically at odds with the prevailing views and practices of our contemporary culture.' "

The Times also tells us that the uber-conservative group Focus on the Family, which holds a front-row seat in the Bush court, posts a kind of contraceptive warning label on its Web site: " 'Modern contraceptive inventions have given many an exaggerated sense of safety and prompted more people than ever before to move sexual expression outside the marriage boundary.' Contraception, by this logic, encourages sexual promiscuity, sexual deviance (like homosexuality) and a preoccupation with sex that is unhealthful even within marriage." With the president's public approval ratings competitive with Herbert Hoover's in the "most hated ever" range, one would think these diehards might retreat. No, they're forging straight ahead, hoping to wring every regression they can write into federal law and regulation before they decamp or are kicked out of town in January 2009...

http://www.modbee.com/24hour/opinions/story/3282463p-12102387c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well. Isn't that special
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. that crowd should stop having sex and extinct themselves nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Really.
Stick with abstinence folks, we could sure use less of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. WTF? "a preoccupation with sex that is unhealthful even within marriage."
Okay. No debate. These people are starkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. scratch the surface and you`ll find these guys are
closet homosexuals,child and wife abusers,mommies boys,and con men. i don`t think any of them have an once of compassion or a sense of redemption in their sick twisted little minds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree...and to add...for some reason they don't have the
ability to understand cause and effect...

if they keep impacting womens health by denying birth control, abortion and other health issues....the number of unwanted children goes up...the resources of the states get drained providing services....healthcare, child abuse, murder etc....that's short term....long term crime will certainly go up..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Wait, I thought they wanted to cut social services, too ...
so the unwanted little waifs could litter the streets, and RW assholes could kick them and tell them to get a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. more specific the RW kids can go beat the homeless like
they currently are doing....happening more and more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luna_Chick Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. More and more I'm reminded of The Handmaid's Tale...
things are certainly going down that road with these dangerous fundamentalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. We. Told. You. So.
Been yelling and screaming about this for years. These groups have ALWAYS been this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind around this statement:
"Contraception, by this logic, encourages sexual promiscuity, sexual deviance (like homosexuality)..."

By what kind of twisted logic can you argue that contraception encourages homosexuality? Am I missing something here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Good question.
I wouldn't think homosexuals would need birth control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Idiots. Oral contraceptives are not only used for controlling birth; they
are prescribed often to regulate a woman's cycle, for acne, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. But who wants a lot of little homos running around?!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Good catch.
Seems one would be safe from unplanned pregnancy in that arena. But these are fundies we're talking about...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Maybe the slippery slope
You know: "If we allow women to control their reproduction with contraception, the next thing you know they'll want to kiss other women!"

Paging Rick Santorum, paging Rick Santorum . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. These peole are so stoopid!
"Contraception, by this logic, encourages sexual promiscuity, sexual deviance (like homosexuality) and a preoccupation with sex ..."

Now, I have to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. WHO didn't see THAT coming?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yeah, but have you seen the new anti-abortion drug?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Let them try. The Republicans will be turned into a tiny fringe party.
Everyone uses birth control with the exception of maybe a tiny fraction of the population. People enjoy sex, alright? Even Republicans do. If the extreme right pushes this it will get interesting in a hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC