Purge time in FRetard City: RimJob goes wild

[warrens]

To: Idisarthur Attention:

Those of you who are calling for revolution, secession, violence, impeachment, etc, will no longer be posting on FR. Sheesh, it's a phony report (pure Marxist propaganda), but it sure is exposing a lot of hothead idiot trolls.

178 posted on 05/09/2006 2:10:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson < Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1629359/posts?q=1&&page=151

This one's a real laff riot. The screeching and limb-gnawing over there is music to my ears. Oh, btw, this is about reports that the gummint is leaking location of the Minutemen to the Mexicans.

[redqueen]

1. Wow... that doesn't seem that farfetched to me...

I mean, at first I thought :wtf:

But really... the hotel industry, janitorial industry, etc. would be negatively impacted if the stream of illegal, easily exploited immigrants were stemmed.

[MADem]

2. Ugh, how can you bear it???

You've a stronger stomach than many of us!

My fear is that if they are tossed overboard, they'll swim over here and try to bother us. Who needs the trollishness? Hopefully there's some other whacky site they can go to where they can vent their spleens....

[Ian David]

11. They can go bother the moderators on the Yahoo boards! n/t

[stepnw1f]

3. Good... He Pisses on His Own Following

the stupid dellusional piece of crap that he is.

[arcane1]

4. I find it amusingly interesting...

that this was the issue that FINALLY turned some against Bush...

[BrklynLiberal]

6. THAT and the high gasoline prices.

:puke:
Nothing that happened up until then bothered them :crazy: :crazy:

[warrens]

7. It's all Marxist propaganda, Comrade!

I get such a kick out of that place sometimes. The legit conservative boards are having a ball with this.

[GoneOffShore]

38. There are legitimate conservative boards?

I need to check that out!

:sarcasm:

[tsuki]

5. Are these real people? Sometimes, I think that it a couple of

sick comedians the RNC hired.

[Infomaniac]

8. Ahhh! I do love the sound of freeper heads exploding....

Snap, crackle, pop. It sounds like Condi Rice Krispies over there in Freeperland.

[ComerPerro]

9. If the minutemen aren't doing anything wrong, then

they have nothing to worry about.


right, Republicans?

[Hubert Flottz]

19. If it's a hoax why is the story on Lou Dobbs this very minute?

Rim is covering Bush's ass at the expense of his own flockers.

Lou Dobbs and the minutemen on his program believe the government ratted them out and spied on them.

[janx]

24. Touche. n/t

[lvx35]

10. they gave the infomation to the Mexican government!

My understanding is that they gave the infomation to the Mexican government, who is also not a fan of illegal immigration....Not to Mexicans crossing. But still, if I had to choose I'd take the purged freepers over the blind Bush bots. I don't agree with conservatism but if we had an actual conservative president, who didn't spend more than any president in history, we'd be in a much better place now.

[Caoimhe]

12. This one makes me grin ear to ear

"I shudder at the thought of the country going through that, again... I still remember all the Watergate hearings (and that was before Cable TV) and then Monicagate, the dems will never rest until they get one-ups-manship -- I just hate that our President keeps playing into their hands." by Arizona Caroline


Yes, he is playing into our hands!

[Monk06]

13. Red Alert ! Red Alert ! ........My revenge is complete and it is .......

SWEET !!!!!!!!!!!!!

My definition of a FReeper just made the top of the
URBAN DICTIONARY.

Number four on the charts, approval/disapproval
three thumbs up, three thumbs down. Hit it my pretty
DU ponies

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FReeper

It even has my DU screen name, although I may live to
regret that.

[Jane Austin]

16. How do you vote?

It's not readily apparent to me.

[Monk06]

21. In Canada, Liberal or NDP, in that order.

[Jane Austin]

41. Smile!

I meant, how does one register a vote on that website. :)

[Monk06]

34. Oh BTW I'm nuts about golden retrievers. n/t

[Jane Austin]

42. I have a friend in Ontario who breeds some of the nicest Goldens

I've ever seen.

She's an awfully nice person, too.

[Robbie Michaels]

37. I like it

I like how MercuryRising's definition is taking a beating...

Freeper 18 up, 95 down

One who analyzes and recommends action with regards to political matters from the perspective of logic and rationality, rather than rabid emotion

"Unlike the flailing guilt-ridden granola crunching trend sucking dilettante lefty moonbats at dailykos, freepers make it a habit to think before speaking, and don't consider grotesque sexual slanders to be an answer to argument"

[heart of darkness]

48. voted..I also like this definition of a freeper

Not sure if it makes sense, but it does help with my vision of the free'public

Freeper

someone who freeps a lot
to freep: fall asleep on the toilet in the middle of explosive diarea so your shit winds up touching your ass. Anti freeping medicine is available at your local pharmacy in the hair products aisle.

Dude last night i cought Joe freeping in the guys bathroom

[janx]

14. Marxist propaganda?

Is that what he calls TRUTH? That guy has purged some of his earliest supporters, who were primarily of a libertarian bent, and with whom I agree on occasion. There are some on Liberty Post who are interesting and informed.

So he's kicking out all but the most extreme. Pretty soon all he'll have left is the Terri Schiavo crowd...and me! :rofl:

[janx]

15. LOOK!

To: Jim Robinson
it's a phony report (pure Marxist propaganda)

Okay, suddenly I am feeling naive. Please clarify how this works, is it the planting of a false story? Are the quotes fake? If so I think this is a fascinating study in itself how something like Marxists planting a story to stir up conservatives is done. I want to understand more, so I can be wary. What compels Tancredo to react to this story as well? Does he also know this is false propaganda and using it to his benefit? I'm embarrassed to admit, I am a bit confused.

Any clarification would be helpful. I would hate to contact my congress people over a false claim. Thanks.
413 posted on 05/09/2006 5:00:29 PM PDT by GOP Poet

:rofl:

[Disturbed]

17. Maybe the Minutemen spread this rumor?

It would help them, right?

[htuttle]

18. Sounds like that freeper's calling Bullshit on RimJob

:D

:rofl:

[janx]

20. PRECISELY.

Very well done, too! :rofl: It's articulate, it's semi-subtle, and it's funny as hell!

[janx]

22. Uh-Oh.

Here's another one!

To: Jim Robinson
If it is phony...why are minutemen spokesmen all over local radio stations in every market confirming it to be true. They are not saying much about the Border Patrol either...they are expressly saying HOMELAND SECURITY IS INVOLVED. Are they making it up? If this is a true story...lame duck ain't the half of it. So far I have seen nothing to confirm to me that Lenin had anything to do with this story. Or Karl Marx for that matter.


JEDI.
430 posted on 05/09/2006 5:32:22 PM PDT by JediForce (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)

It's not as good as the poet's, but it's still good.

[me b zola]

40. WTF does this mean?

"(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)"


:wtf:

[Monk06]

30. LOOK AGAIN!! THERE'S MORE .................. (long)..............

To: spectre
Lou Dobbs is a self proclaimed LIFE long Republican, contrary to the smear tactics that say he is otherwise.

SMEAR tactics? Like this one?

To: Arizona Carolyn

Lou Dobbs is a Bush hating Marxist tool. Be careful who you go to bed with. You're being used.

261 posted on 05/09/2006 4:57:51 PM CDT by Jim Robinson

< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies | Report Abuse >


To: Jim Robinson
If it is phony...why are minutemen spokesmen all over local radio stations in every market confirming it to be true. They are not saying much about the Border Patrol either...they are expressly saying HOMELAND SECURITY IS INVOLVED. Are they making it up? If this is a true story...lame duck ain't the half of it. So far I have seen nothing to confirm to me that Lenin had anything to do with this story. Or Karl Marx for that matter.


JEDI.
430 posted on 05/09/2006 5:32:22 PM PDT by JediForce (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies >


To: FreedomFarmer; Jim Robinson
Thanks, we received your abuse report regarding #178.

Regarding #178

This (edited for language) idiot has flip-flopped on his boarder stance 3 times this week. Put his ass in time-out for a while.

Unfortunately, every time we hit the suspend button we received an error message.

Sorry about that.
454 posted on 05/09/2006 5:58:25 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies >



To: Jim Robinson; americafirst; sinkspur; Dane; holdonnow; Jeff Head; Brian Allen; nicmarlo; dirtboy; ..
Jim accept my expressed admiration for you and John and your achievements. I want to see this forum grow into something bigger. However we are being held back by a disruptive force that is at work here.

Jim to hear sinkspur talk, threatening to get people banned and always dropping your name one would think that you take work direction from him.

Both Dane and Sinkspur make one personal attack after another, they hi-jack threads and try to intimidate or provoke posters. This tactic often leads to a thread being pulled. We can't tell, because you will not show aliases, but it also appears they use more than one screen name.

Their obvious goal is to prevent meaningful results from being achieved.

They have been doing it since before Bush came into office. Even under Clinton they were pro government disruptor's.

When someone makes a personal attack or disrupts a thread, anyone should be able to hit the abuse button and bar them from that thread, if the moderator agrees it was a personal attack or a disruption..

Are their privileged characters or not?

THIS WEB SITE can and should be relevant. Currently less than 4500 people on this site indicated they will stick by the GOP if they don't act to control the border.

I predict. This site is in jeopardy of becoming irrelevant. Your answer will tell us which way it is going to go.

If you doubt this, you should run a poll on it.

Looking forward to using the system and getting some good work done.

:)Easy Does IT:)
466 posted on 05/09/2006 6:28:49 PM PDT by eazdzit (Register Independent CROSS OVER IN THE PRIMARIES!!! VOTE AGAINST CFR, NWO, GLOBALIST RepuboCrats !!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies >


To: RHINO369

Right. But Jim Robinson in post #178 is calling this a phoney report. I am not sure anymore what is real in this. Hope Robinson provides some explanation or link.

587 posted on 05/09/2006 10:44:50 PM PDT by Hostage
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies >


To: CWOJackson

Oh yes it is changing our subject which is your wanting to "go hard on them".

That reveals alot about what you're all about. Your initial info to me was appreciated but your followup attitude only serves to make the problem worse in my opinion.

Your initial info was a cut and paste about border control operations policy and procedure. The fact is now there are no facts, just allegations. We have yet to hear from the sources.

For all we know a low level border control official may have given a detainees attorney info on MM locations in response to an abuse complaint by an illegal border crosser.

I'm sorry but in a court of law your argument would be tossed unless you have facts, evidence and ultimately proof to substantiate that Congressman Tancredo was duped.

But more importantly in this latter possibility is who would dupe him and why?

Aren't you concerned about that?

Are you wanting the "go hard on them" as some sort of policy to disrupt things further? You need not respond, it's pretty obvious the mustard is not being cut here. Go ahead and try to suprise otherwise.

You do not know, I do not know, we do not know and Mr. Jim Robinson does not know because he has not backed up his statement. And neither have you. It's very concerning that without backup, you would accuse others of speculating alternative views.

One thing we do know is there is a lack of leadership on the serious issues of the border.

603 posted on 05/10/2006 12:23:32 AM PDT by Hostage
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies >
To: Hostage
You might not think a U.S. Congressman spouting unsubstantiated BS is no big deal, I think it's highly irresponsible and should receive due action.

As for your court of law arguments...LOL, you seem to forget that "facts" are important...and Tancredo demonstrated none whatsoever.
604 posted on 05/10/2006 12:26:49 AM PDT by CWOJackson
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies >
To: CWOJackson

Once again you are talking without backup. If I acted as an investigator I would want all the witnesses and all the testimony prepared for resolution.

Tell us which facts you know.

But maybe I have "gone too hard on you". Do you like it? Does it make you feel good? Are you a better human being for it?

The fact is I chose to "go hard on you" to show you what your own thoughts can produce. Are we unified? Do we agree on anything?

Yes this policy of "going hard on folks" is a real winner.

So you think Tancredo is the culprit here. How about answering the question put to you before. If Tancredo is speaking from a false set of facts, who put those facts before him? Are you concerned about that? Or are you just content to "go hard on him"?.

605 posted on 05/10/2006 12:37:05 AM PDT by Hostage
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 604 | View Replies >
To: Hostage

No, that would be Tancredo who talked without backup...you know, without all those things you would want as an investigator. As for being a culprit, no one forced Tancredo to make these public statements...it's his responsibility to check the facts.

606 posted on 05/10/2006 12:40:38 AM PDT by CWOJackson
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies >
To: CWOJackson

And how do you know that he didn't check facts?

I'll repeat the request:

Why don't you tell the thread the facts that you know or you think you know?

607 posted on 05/10/2006 12:43:22 AM PDT by Hostage
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies >


To: CWOJackson

I have viewed all the replies of Mr. Jim Robinson and of you. No backup has been given.

If you don't want to state the facts you think you have, then that is your choice. It's entirely expected and not at all taken the wrong way.

The consular relations is nice background information but it does not disprove Congressman Tancredo's report.

His report ***may*** indeed be based on a false set of facts.

We do not know, do we?

Goodnight and please be nice in the future to your fellow conservatives however confused and misled they may be.


613 posted on 05/10/2006 12:54:30 AM PDT by Hostage
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies >


To: CWOJackson

POST #178
To: Idisarthur
Attention:

Those of you who are calling for revolution, secession, violence, impeachment, etc, will no longer be posting on FR. Sheesh, it's a phony report (pure Marxist propaganda), but it sure is exposing a lot of hothead idiot trolls.

178 posted on 05/09/2006 2:10:17 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies |[br />
THE REPLIES:
#275,#281,#284,#352,#413,#430,#454.


YOUR POSTS ON THIS THREAD:
#580,#582,#585,#591

THE REPLIES TO YOUR POSTS ON THIS THREAD:
#581,#583

AND YOUR FIRST POST TO ME:
#570
AND THE REPLIES:
#572,#594

AND LASTLY ALL THE SUBSEQUENT POSTS BETWEEN YOU AND I THAT REVEAL NO FACTS TO DISCREDIT THE TANCREDO REPORT.

In not any of these posts are there any facts that discredit Tancredo's report. I am not defending him but I want to see the facts.

As far as your remark that I haven't been looking, well anyone can see that I have searched. What makes you think I haven't been searching?

And then you want to add that I am not interested in the truth? Let's see I have asked for your help several times, I have searched the entire thread and I can't get any facts that shed light on the truth that you say is right here in this thread. So I am not interested in the truth? The facts are here in this thread somewhere because you say they are?

Too bad these threads don't have a little rating scale by the posters. If it existed, where do you think yours would rank?

617 posted on 05/10/2006 1:32:53 AM PDT by Hostage
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies >

To: Jim Robinson
Sheesh, it's a phony report (pure Marxist propaganda), but it sure is exposing a lot of hothead idiot trolls.

Hotheads, maybe...but trolls? C'mon! Tancredo? Malkin? Glenn Reynolds? Hinderacker? The National Review?

The CPB was caught contradicting itself, and its statement claiming 'inaccuracy' was carefully parsed, check this out...

Is the U.S. Giving Mexico Intelligence about Americans?
-- And will the immigration controversy boil over as a result?
By Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review Online, May 10, 2006

Link at: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWY0NzE4MGY1MGViMWNjNTdlYTcxYjZlMWFiOGYwYjQ=

[Monk06]

23. Read this FReepers are dissing the boss.............

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1629359/posts?q=1&&page=251

To: Jim Robinson

Upon what do you base this ill-informed opinion?

290 posted on 05/09/2006 3:33:04 PM PDT by satan
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies >

[Initech]

25. Wow, they're ripping at each other's throats! This is great!

Pass the popcorn!

:popcorn:

[sendero]

26. "Marxist propaganda"..

.... if you stacked up every word of Marxist propaganda in the history of time, it would look like a molehill compared to the mountain of Republican Talking Point Echo Chamber Noise Machine Faux Stenographer bullshit this country has been subjected to since the Reagan era.

[janx]

27. Malkin is involved?!

:rofl:

To: Jim Robinson
Sheesh, it's a phony report (pure Marxist propaganda), but it sure is exposing a lot of hothead idiot trolls.

Hotheads, maybe...but trolls? C'mon! Tancredo? Malkin? Glenn Reynolds? Hinderacker? The National Review?

The CPB was caught contradicting itself, and its statement claiming 'inaccuracy' was carefully parsed, check this out...

Is the U.S. Giving Mexico Intelligence about Americans?
-- And will the immigration controversy boil over as a result?
By Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review Online, May 10, 2006

Link at: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MWY0NzE4MGY1MGViMWNjNTdlYTcxYjZlMWFiOGYwYjQ=
684 posted on 05/10/2006 11:59:13 AM PDT by Paul Ross (We cannot be for lawful ordinances and for an alien conspiracy at one and the same moment.-Cicero)

[janx]

28. And compounding the chaos is a TECHIE glitch:

To: FreedomFarmer; Jim Robinson
Thanks, we received your abuse report regarding #178.

Regarding #178

This (edited for language) idiot has flip-flopped on his boarder stance 3 times this week. Put his ass in time-out for a while.

Unfortunately, every time we hit the suspend button we received an error message.

Sorry about that.
454 posted on 05/09/2006 5:58:25 PM PDT by Admin Moderator

The admins *can't* kick anyone out because the software is screwed up! :rofl:

[Old and In the Way]

36. I think that was a bit of humor....#178 was Dimrob's post.

[Monk06]

39. So JRob is a #%&* idiot according to one loyal FReeper ....

"This (edited for language) idiot has flip-flopped on his boarder stance 3 times this week"

The admin mod just admitted that if you
try to ZOT the boss you get an error message.

Too funny.

[Coventina]

29. Maybe this will FINALLY convince the FReepers that Bush does NOT care

about this country or its citizens.

All he cares about is his own sorry ass and those of the "have-mores".

[Old and In the Way]

31. Pretty funny

This must be in response to Dimrob's post-

<>

[janx]

32. Where did you find that?

Did you make it?

[Old and In the Way]

33. It was on the OP thread link, around the 450-500 page.

LOL, too good to be a real FReeper creation, I think.

[Fuzz]

35. The post that he was reasponding to had a pic of Timothy McVeigh

and it said:

I don't agree with the Oklahoma City Bomber Timothy McVeigh however I see how revolutionaries get their zeal/fervor.

[Marr]

43. Be a Forum of One.

He's eventually going to have the memebership whittled down to three mentally retarded people with GW Bush tattoos.

[Jamison]

44. Rim Job's hurting himself by this.

Jeez is he not smart enough to realize that he's losing his revenue base by purging these fools. You know he profits well from the donations given to him b/c that damn site is STILL reminiscent of a circa-1994 web forum after all these years.

Oh well, let them self-destruct I say.

[MADem]

47. There's only one explanation, then=his subscribers are NOT his revenue

base.

Someone needs to check the line item entries in Ken Mehlman's RNC accounts. Or maybe Jacko Abramoff had some Indian casino owners toss a few grand at him.

Think about it...it's way cheaper than advertising, and responds immediately to a 24 hour news cycle. Dan Rather, anyone???

[Catrina]

45. This is about the third freeper purge in the past few months. Jimrob is

losing control of his freepers ~ in a poll last week, 20% of freepers said they'd vote for a Democrat next time. Never thought I'd see that on FR. :rofl:

[Mike Daniels]

46. Look for #4 if Coulter continues her "evolutionists are commies" tact

Jim Rob's going to have to purge again.

There was total civil war on the board earlier this week over Coulter declaring that "if you believe in Darwinism/evolution that you're a god-hating atheistic liberal commie".

One evolution thread generated about 800 responses of "screw you's" before it was yanked.