Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stagflation: it's here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 11:55 AM
Original message
Stagflation: it's here
Stagflation: a term coined by economists in the 1970s to describe the previously unprecedented combination of slow economic growth and rising prices.

http://www.internetional.se/toft/stagflation.htm

I haven't had a raise since Clinton was President, even though I've been promoted and have more responsibility. Yes, I've gotten rewards like stock options (useless for the moment since we're not a public company), and I got $200 bonus last Christmas for finishing a massive end-of-year project ahead of schedule. My husband has gotten cost of living raises and bonuses, but only because he works for a small foreign company and has a great boss.

The government has a new way of measuring inflation-one that does not count energy and food costs. Since my food bill has nearly doubled in 3 years, and I won't even comment on the cost of gas and home heating oil, how can anyone in government claim the economy is doing well?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. By what measure?
Edited on Mon May-01-06 11:59 AM by Nederland
GDP growth is healthy and inflation is low.

When you say "it's here", do you actually mean "it's here" or are you making a prediction?


...cause the numbers don't look anything like the 70's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. GDP has nothing to do with wealth creation
It's not a valid measure. Kind of like the CPI in that regard. Or the unemployment rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autonomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The OP addressed the inflation rate
as manipulated by excluding essentials that are on the rise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Exactly, Autonomy. The measures are completely different.
Edited on Mon May-01-06 12:08 PM by AllieB
than they were in the '70s. But I don't want to rain on the parade of those championing Bush's sound economic policies, since they are obviously benefiting like a whopping 10% of Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slide to the left Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. inflation is not low
Its near the top of the "ok" level. Fisher (dallas fed pres) has a way of hinting at things he shouldn't, like the inflation level. Anyway, enough about Fisher. The fed has been rasing interest rates for 22 months straight... why you ask... to slow inflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. inflation is here
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,16849-2160208,00.html

US inflation tests Fed's comfort zone
By Rhys Blakely

Higher incomes helped American consumers hike their spending by more than expected in March, despite large petrol price rises, but inflation also accelerated to the top of the Federal Reserve’s target range.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. To the responses above
None of you answered my question: by what measure?

By the accepted economic measures, there WAS stagflation in the 1970's. GDP growth was low or negative and inflation was in double digits. So I'm asking, when the OP says that stagflation is here, what measurements is s/he looking at? Standard government issued statistics or what? It's a simple question that implies nothing about the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MostlyLurks Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Perhaps she was speaking on a more personal level.
Edited on Mon May-01-06 01:04 PM by MostlyLurks
The definition of "stagflation" as she's defined it can be based on a microeconomic assessment as well as a macroeconomic.

Her story bears that out: her personal income has remained flat (possibily family too, but that's less clear) while her expenses have undoubtedly gone up. So maybe she was relating her personal story as a harbinger or indicator of stagflation in a larger sense. Or maybe she was simply speaking solely of her personal situation. Economics, like politics, is all local, know what I mean? I tend to think the latter is the explanation.

Mostly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. If the costs of energy and fuel were figured into the inflation index
then stagflation would no doubt exist. It is not based on my personal experience, or even the experiences of the majority of Americans. It is based upon real wage growth and the old inflation index, which included the above costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MostlyLurks Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. But I think Nederland's Point is this:
I can't speak for him/her, only extrapolate:

It's all well and good to say IF the numbers included these measures then we'd have stagflation...

But that's only tru if you know the specific values of the numbers that are excluded. So when you say "it's definitely here", that implies that you know what the inflationary values of energy and food costs. I think that's what s/he is getting at: what specific values are you plugging in for those excluded costs? I don't necessarily know that Nederlander is agreeing or disagreeing with you but is rather questioning the basis in fact of the statement you're making. Which is certainly his/her right.

Personally, my situation mimics your own: haven't had a raise (not even COL) in four years now, SO has gotten some COL and some merit, but overall our dollars have shrunk.

Mostly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Question
If fuel costs are included, what is the inflation rate? Please provide a link to demonstrate the source of your data. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autonomy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. how can anyone in government claim the economy is doing well?
Because the owners and investor class are cleaning up. IOW, the rich are getting richer, so how can things be bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I haven't had a real job since Clinton was president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I know a lot of people in your predicament
Many of them have advanced degrees and many years of experience in their fields. My husband and I consider ourselves very lucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. The government changed the measurement methods of....
inflation since the 70's to make inflation look lower than it really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. 'Oh the economy is doing great while inflation is racing
at break neck speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. So what measure are we using to determine we're experiencing stagflation?
This is an area where Dems need to be right on point. We have to be able to explain this stuff clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. See everyone's explanation about how inflation is now measured
everyone knows the costs of food and energy are soaring. I agree that the Dems need to develop some sound bytes around the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. "The government has a new way...
...of measuring inflation-one that does not count energy and food costs."

The government has a new way a avoiding reality: BushCo's Bizarro World, where up is down, black is white, torture is legal, inflation's in check, economy doing great, ports are secure, spending under control, great progress in Iraq, international relations couldn't be better, poverty being stamped out, New Orleans bouncing right back, wonderful health care system taking care of everybody, and on, and on, and on.

Not since the Great Depression have things been this good---CHEER UP, PEOPLE!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. no food or energy in inflation measures -- also fed is printing money
we're not sinking, we're soaring!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-01-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. Question
The government has a new way of measuring inflation-one that does not count energy and food costs.

Where did you read that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC