Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gov't Files Statement of Interest in AT&T Case (states secrets)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:31 PM
Original message
Gov't Files Statement of Interest in AT&T Case (states secrets)
The United States filed today a "Statement of Interest" in EFF's class-action lawsuit against AT&T, which accuses the telecom giant of violating the law and the privacy of its customers by collaborating with the National Security Agency (NSA) in its massive and illegal program to wiretap and data-mine Americans' communications.

The statement advises "the Court that the United States intends to assert the military and state secrets privilege in this action. In addition, the United States will also move to intervene and to seek dismissal of this case."

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/004612.php

For info on the original suit see:

http://www.linuxelectrons.com/article.php/20060406031301790

and:

http://news.rgj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060414/BIZ15/604140369/1086/BIZ15

and an excellent summary here:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shayana-kadidal/secret-court-proceedings-_b_19956.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. When did AT&T become the state? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Back in the 80s when they were broken up,
one of the rationales offered in the opinion pages was that they were a threat to the state because they'd grown too large (IIRC).

Now, it seems, we find out a different truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. See "The President's Analyst", c. 1968
It'll tell you all you need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. "I was right! I'm not paranoid! They really are all out to get me!"
LOL at that recollection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. The assertion of state secrets affirms the substance of the allegations
We should all send a nice check to EFF for filing this suit. You should also read the complaint. Confirms that Bush has been spyng on ALL of us.

AT&T is the common carrier for most of the long-distance service in the US, and practically all int'l calls. If your call went out over their lines, which it probably did, Dubya was listening, thanks to AT&T's recording of your calls, and voluntary turnover of the tapes to NSA. All of of the tapes for four years -- 60 terrabyes worth.

Let's give AT&T, W, and the boyz and girlz at the NSA a big DU shout-out!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think that if anybody ever takes me to court...
I think that if anybody ever takes me to court I will assert that my actions are secret and declare the case dismissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-28-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is important! KICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-29-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. This is scary!
Do we have a lawyer present? Can they do this? i know they don't have to obey the law, but legally can they do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC