Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Alito Hearing Thread - Day 1 – Thread 7

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:10 PM
Original message
Official Alito Hearing Thread - Day 1 – Thread 7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sessions up now
Funny how Alito's answers are longer and seem to make more sense when they are asked by repugs, huh? Oh silly me. They submit them in advance for him, don't they?

If they don't, it sure seems like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He doesn't answer any Democratic questions.
Actaully, he doesn't really answer Republican questions either but he doesn't sound shaken, rattled and rolled while he's answering...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I was noticing his apparent answer in thread 6 about FISA
the talking point about warrants being burdensome and time-consuming... now where have I heard that before... :freak:

Coached much, Alito?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Funny how all of a sudden
he stopped stammering and stuttering. Hmmmmmmm scripted before hand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Totally scripted. The RW depends upon their sheep like followers
not to notice or even consider the possibility of coaching and the use of talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. except for Grassley
Obviously Alito read Grassley's questions before Grassley did!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jinx!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. LOL
You do it from now on. I will have to start dinner soon, ok? :hug: ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thank you for your hard work (really!) Sydnie! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. thanks for adding to them Cottonbear.
I am much better with the snark unless I am transcribing word for word, so I appreciate the help with the actual details. I can admit my shortcomings. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I can start the next one at least... then real life will intrude again
I'm sure we can talk some kind, community minded CSPAN Junkie to take over after that! :hug:

What's for dinner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Not sure yet. LOL
Something fast I think. :rofl: My son is at work and it's just my daughter and I tonight so ... super duper precedent in my house says, just two ... that's easy peasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can you hear the strained tone in his voice
when he gets a tough question? It means he's lying--the tone goes up by a quarter or half step. Sure sign of falsehood. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. falters too... like yesterday
when he spewed that "no one is above or below the law" :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. No one is below the law?
Hmmm... what the hell does that mean?

I thought equal justice was under the law... but that's just me ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. ARKANSAS DU'ERS! CONTACT MARK PRYOR, TELL HIM TO VOTE NO OR FILIBUSTER

Mark Pryor

Washington, D.C. Office
257 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-2353
Fax: (202) 228-0908
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. and check out the link for bettyellen in the OP!
Thank you all, very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AbbyR Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
94. I've already done that, and...
I just got a call to follow up on two press releases from some right-wing group called the Family Council Action Committee. They are holding press conferences all over the state to push residents to let Lincoln and Pryor know that they want Alito confirmed. Our senators are uncommitted right now, but I'm betting they vote to approve him.

Our circulation doesn't go that far, so I won't be attending.

I don't know if the folks opposing Alito are working in this state, and if they are, I have not heard from them. Someone had better get on the ball - I work for a small paper and will write my column opposing him, but we could sure use some help in Arkansas.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. Guess wifey doesn't work for pay huh?
Was that a jab at Abramoff? They had better watch what they ask. Could get ugly really fast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. His "traditional" stance on "crime"
meant: Overturn "Miranda'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. What a buffoon
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 04:39 PM by Strawman
"Do ya know what a fedrul judge makes as salry?"

"Senator Specter says ize too dumb to be on the Circuit Court but ize smart!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Conservatives can be activists too
Here I thought he was going to talk about protestors... but no.... he's bringing up activist judges again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. Pick your favorite Alito quote of the day
so I can analyse it for Truth in Anagrams ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jesus, who is this Sessions asshat?
Talk about a toady--"Can you live on a Chief Justice's salary?" As if he'd say "No,I must request more!" :wtf: Un-freaking-believable. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Roberts wants them to all get a raise anyway
so, he might get a 30% raise as soon as he signs on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Unlike the poor
minimum wage slobs whose eventual case will be thrown out of SCOTUS when it gets that far. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. "Does you hate France too?"
Those Red State Repugs don't like no fancy forun' law readin'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. God forgive me,
and I mean no disrespect to our Southern brethren, but certain southern accents grate like nails on a blackboard. Some flow like honey and some grate. Sessions grates. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Did you see him coming back from the lunch break?
He went right up to Alito, kissed one of the women with him (not wifeypoo), shook siefeypoo's hand and fawned all over them. It made me want to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. We don't care what the world thinks , we will do it our way
screw them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Right-wing talking point.
We won't let them furiners tell US what to do. (pumps fist -- hoot, hoot, hoot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. poddy time again - til 5 of 5
going to go start dinner now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. What Shumer is saying now is great
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 04:45 PM by Strawman
Very direct. When is it his turn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. You said it, Strawman!
Go Chuck Schumer! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
34. Feingold up next...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
35. Get set for Feingold...
Let's hope he gives the SOB extremist a sphincter-testing run for his money. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
36. Feingold coming up
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. oopsie
You guys are fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lavenderdiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. now maybe we'll get somewhere and hear some answers...
so far Alito has been VERY good at absolutely avoiding answering any questions pointed at him. He mouths a lot and says a lot of words, but doesn't give any direct answers. I don't think Feingold is going to let him off the hook...

This oughta be good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
38. Specifics? Got your specifics right here.
Feingold was ready for that non-answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toymachines Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. He is gonna stay on top of this one
Alito is gonna have to squirm to bullshit this question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
39. The Twilight Zone again.
Bush = King in the Twilight Zone.

BTW, called Feingold and asked if he is gonna let Grassley call him a liar. Told staff I was really, really, really angry over that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
40. That depends on what the definition of "is" is.
Jesus...this guy just dances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
41. Does the Pres. have the authority to wire tap etc...
As I understand the question... blah blah... come on! get to the answer all ready!

It may come before the court.

I would have to know the specifics of the arguements made.

Feingold - That's why I'm asking you word for word (AG's answer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Got him Feingold
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:01 PM by malaise
you got him. The face is as red as the tie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:00 PM
Original message
Can the Pres. break the law or authorize others to do so?
Pres. must follow statutes. depends on the facts of the case.

YES OR NO would be good! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
45. Another convoluted
run around.
"Does the President have the authority to authorize un-warranted wiretapping"--Feingold.

Blah, blah, blah--Alito "That's certainly a question that could come before the court".

Go, Russ--Sam's ass is grass!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
46. somebody just asked a question about torture precise enough to be useful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
47. Folks, I've seen enough.
Is it time to blanket the Dems with calls for filibuster?

My two Senators are hopeless, but I'm going to fax or e-mail all the rest. Is it time yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toymachines Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. The time has come
Alito is a rat fink, we dont need more of them deciding our futures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. me too. This guy will say anything.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. he's saying he wasn't coached on his answers....yeah, right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
48. Feingold cuts to the chase
Alito bobs and weaves!
There is your play by play
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
50. Ah! The president only has to follow and uphold
laws -- that are consistent with the constitution. HOWEVER, Alito, Scalia, Thomas and Bush get to determine which laws are 'consistent.'

Weasel words, weasel, weasel, weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Alito = Weasel. I'm calling my Republican Senators re: fillibuster.
He absolutely refuses to give an answer, any answer. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Can you believe this utter
crap? "If this question comes before the court, the court will have to make a decision", Duh! "What I meant to say was...." :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #55
74. I could have come up with that answer! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
52. Do NOT! DO NOT! LIE ABOUT WHAT YOU PRACTICED!
UN-BE-LIEVABLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
53. if the committee ties on their vote, will Alito be passed on to the
Senate for a vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
54. he can't remember what questions came up during practice sessions?
yeah, right.

Punch this doughboy's ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
56. OMG!
He WON'T answer ANY questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. Holy crap,
Feingold is making him look like the slippery slimeball he is. Beautiful!! SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
57. He's asking who was present at the practice sessions
relating to FISA!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #57
68. and he DIDN'T ANSWER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
59. Is Feingold GOING SOMEWHERE with this?
It sounds like he is. All of a sudden he's an attorney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. Yep. It's what you do to a witness who is lying to you.
Did you prepare for your testimony today?

Who helped you prepare?

Did you talk about questions like (whatever?)

What kind of answers did you discuss?

Did anyone give you any comments or feedback on your answers?

Who? What did they say?

It's a courtroom technique, and sometimes it helps expose a liar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. I hope Feingold gets him in perjury
comes at it from a different angle and BAM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #59
71. Hot damn!
Gotta love Feingold--he looks like a Dem, he sounds like a Dem, he kicks ass! SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
61. wiggly worm squirming squirming squirming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
62. "Nobody ever told me what to say."
That was NOT the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
64. Feingold suggesting Alito was coached by Bush Admin on wiretaps
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:09 PM by worldgonekrazy
Alito is lying his ass off. Says he was only given suggestions on "style" and not "substance" of his answers.

"I wouldn't have been receptive to that kind of advice, and I did not receive that type of advice," Alito said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
65. he is squrming, can't simply tell the truth n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
66. Feingold: Did FISA come up in practice sessions?
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:10 PM by CottonBear
Alito: (weasel, weasel, weasel...) FISA ...no...general area of wiretapping did come up...

Feingold: Who told you what to say?

Alito: No one has ever told me what to say. I was ...told about format of the hearing...

Feingold: Did you get feedback or comment during the practice sessions?

Alito: Only style (of answer)was suggested...not substance of answer...
no one told me on what basis th epresident was asserting...FISA...I found out on the internet...

No one in the Admin. has briefed me...(on FISA)

It would be inappropriate for anyone from NSA to (brief me) on what to say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
67. The original question was "WHO BRIEFED YOU."
here he comes in for the kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. He says no one ( in * admin.) told him what to say. Weasel. n/t
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:11 PM by CottonBear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #69
73. I guess they wrote it down for him? Interpretive dance? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. Who knows? His weaseliness is off the scale! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #69
78. He'll be sweating this.
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:14 PM by LizW
Somebody prepared him. It's not classified, so it can be found out who was there. If they are connected to Bushco, then he's a liar.

We'll know by tomorrow, mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #78
84. They just :advised him on substance...not on what to say." WEASEL
I hope someopne can nail his ass to the floor with this statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
72. GOOOOOOOO FEINGOLD!! HE IS BRILLIANT!! I LOVE THIS MAN!!
I FREAKING LOVE FEINGOLD!!

three cheers for his questions and his attantion to details...and his brilliance!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. If the Dems are gonna nail Alito, it will be Feingold who makes the kill
He needs to get a really scandalous soundbite out of Alito though, and I don't think the weasel will let that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #77
91. He can do it if he can get Alito to talk about
his practice sessions and reveal he's gotten substantive feedback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #72
80. Wow, this is one helluva
legal mind! Freaking brilliant! Russ Rules!! SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toymachines Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #72
81. and yet all i hear from alito is whine whine whine
It is hard to listen to him, let alone get something from what he says.
I just had to whine about it. B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #72
82. mitchell brief under nixon alito signed.... for
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:16 PM by flyarm
absolute immunity for mitchell attorney general for nixon..for wiretapping!!

this fucker must be filabustered!!

there is no choice on this..

now this weasel is saying absolute immunity should be used sparingly..

what a fucking liar!!

this guy must be fillabustered ..and we must all call write and email the dems and demand it!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #82
86. Whoa. Alito worked for Nixon Admin? I missed that bit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #72
85. this is a signifigant moment. Russ is smoking him out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #72
87. I agree, he's smart honest and gorgeous
:loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #87
92. GO RUSS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #87
93. You'll have to fight off Stephi Miller.
(And me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #87
107. I met him.
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #107
119. good for you
he is one of the best, :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
76. Anyone understand that last quack, quack, quack?
It sounded like Alito doesn't question the legality of issues based upon who is paying him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. Basically yes
he was acting for a 'client' when he wrote that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #83
89. Yeah, total cop-out.
Lawyers ALWAYS have clients.

I hope Joe Biden is hanging his head in shame, watching Russ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #83
96. Now, Russ is
castigating his Repuke colleagues for saying earlier questions about recusal were a "joke". SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #83
103. vanguard..did you put on the list of recusals vanguard...
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:23 PM by flyarm
weasles answer..i don't have the computer list so i can not answer this..

what a fucking liar!!

2+ feingold + the people

-2 weasle + bush

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
88. Fiengold asking about Vanguard now
Is calling out Republicans for trying to bury the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #88
98. Feingold is QUOTING Alito's recusal starements to committee in1996...n/t
Russ talking about letter from ABA dated Jan. 9, 2006: Letter to ABA did not mention ALito's promise to Senate Committee RE: recusals...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #98
109. Alioto: "I don't remember...removing Vanguard from recusal list."
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:25 PM by CottonBear
"List is just an aid for a judge."

Feingold: "Smith Barney and Vanguard were added to recusal list in 2003...(talking about recusal screening system) either V wasn't on list or you did not recognize V was a party in the case. You are talking about something different...it wasn't a computer glitch..."

God, his memory is bad. WEASEL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
90. delete
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:20 PM by realFedUp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
95. Ha! Feingold just gave it to the repukes for berating the Dems for asking
questions about ethics. "That our job." :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #95
101. He really called 'em out on that
It was brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #95
104. Yeah, maybe he doesn't like being called a liar
by that grease-bomb Grassley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
97. Roomie says he saw an article on Yahoo today, Alito admitted spying was
illegal!?

Did you guys hear that while I was out?

No time to go over the last 6 threads! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
99. Neener, neener, neener
Alito is a LIAR, LIAR, LIAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
100. He doesn't - gulp - remember recusal notice
:gulp:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
102. Vanguard who
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
worldgonekrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. Feingold making Alito VERY nervous
Backing him into a corner, Alito trying to evade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #105
110. Feingold saying why didn't you just fess up instead
of recalling all these things that seem unconvincing?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. He basically called him a LIAR (nicely)! Way to go Russ! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #105
111. Feingold was a trial lawyer, yes?
He's wonderful to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #105
114. Does Feingold know something? and just waiting to drop it?
and does Scalito know he knows something?

Feingold laying into Hatch for his bullshit excuses over the Vanguard stock. Feingold asked if he didn't think it was wrong, why did he put Vanguard on his list on recusals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #114
116. UGH! What was the Abramoff JOKE Graham just told?
ummm....NOTHING about Abramoff is FUNNY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #114
117. Bam! Wait a minute, Graham is joking about Abramoff....WTF? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:28 PM
Original message
Hatch to the recuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #102
115. i hatew orin hatch...i wish i could spit at that bastard...initial service
what bullshit is that..fiengold ..no time limit on weasles recusals responsibility..

then hatch goes to the bullshit meter...initial service..wtf???????

what a dick head hatch is!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
106. Thread 8 is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #106
118. I was making dinner so I missed being here but
I have to say FEINGOLD ROCKED!

And Graham needs to be looked at for connection to Abramoff too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
108. I hope a legal mind picks does good analysis in media on this session.
between Feingold and Alito.

Put Feingold on the Supreme Court!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #108
113. Orrin Hatch is asking him canned yes/no questions to try and save him
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 05:29 PM by CottonBear
:puke: Alito is sucking Hatch's dick right now.

Russ is mentioning Alito's "after the fact justifications..." ouch! :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC