Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there a male counterpart to the word "slut" or "whore"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Women » Feminists Group Donate to DU
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:09 AM
Original message
Is there a male counterpart to the word "slut" or "whore"?
I can't think of one. I think that is why these are my most hated words. The other side would be "stud" or "player".
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. As you noted, not one that carries a negative connotation with it
Some friends and I spent some time trying to find something such as you are. I think some of the closest we could find were:

cad - archaic and not very damning

a whorer, i.e., someone who goes whoring - hardly a smack in the face of the man

let's face it, when it comes to language and culture, only women are denegrated for having sex. men are only denegrated for having sex with the "wrong" woman.

yeah, we've come a long way.

/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Males can be sluts or whores.
I don't see those two labels as being gender specific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I've never seen men seriously be called sluts or whores.
Only as a joke. A woman sleeps around in HOllywood--slut. A man does it, say Charlie sheen, Oh that scamp!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. Come live in my world,
and you'll hear men referred to that way every day.

We have standard terms of endearment for the hired professionals we use as expert witnesses. The ones we can always count on to come up with the "correct" testimony are the ones we would never send our spouses or offspring to for treatment or consultation.

Because they're our whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Well, they are
They can be applied to men, but their etiology is quite gender-specific, and there's no way to avoid having that denotation come to mind even when they're used against men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Amen
Check out the Bush administration.

Lots of slut and whores there, and they're all male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. what do you mean by 'wrong woman'?
i don't think men are ever denegrated for having sex, unless it's with another man. of course i speak of the hetero world, the macho men. don't they cheer each other on for sex period?

i can't see my male friends doing this, but i'm aware that others do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. WHen men have sex with women who are perceived as ugly
they get attacked for it. The boyfriend of Carnie Wilson, pre-surgery, for example. I think they went on some radio show and the radio host actually said "HOW could you have sex with THAT"?

Or think about movies like road trip where they make fun of the guy that sleeps with the fat girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
all.of.me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. that is awful. but i see what you mean
it's a peer thing, i guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Gigolo?
That's about the closest I can think of, but that isn't nearly as negative as the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Whorehopper"
was the insult of my youth in the south for a guy who'd jump into bed with anyone or anything.

"Professional cherry buster" is self explanatory, also from my youth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nothing negative.
Slut and whore are both very negative terms for women. Cad, rake, etc. are arcahic. Society used to look down on that, but now it's all the rage. Guys are proud to be pimps, players, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
geniph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. There used to be
a roue' was someone who was particularly slimy in seducing young women. The term's archaic now. Anymore, the only truly pejorative terms applied to a person's sexuality are all aimed at women.

Which is why I won't use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. I use "slut" for myself...
But the word "rake" means what you want. Sadly it has fallen into disuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-21-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Mimbo?
Edited on Tue Jun-21-05 05:44 PM by Kerrytravelers
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nothing That Carries Power
Just like "honky" is not a real or telling insult against white folks, and "breeder" is not a real or telling insult against straight folks. Dominant groups seldom -- if ever -- suffer any negative stigma from words, unlike oppressed groups.

Anytime anyone tells you, "Oh, it's just words," odds are they're trying to sell you a dominant paradigm perspective which serves to entrench their dominant group privilege.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. how about
cock-brained: someone who lets his cock think for him.

I don't know of any real words/terms off-hand, except possibly scum, so I made one up. If y'all like it feel free to toss it around as necessary.

The bigger problem though is that in sexual terms, any man having sex with any woman is thought to a greater or lesser degree to be a good thing; whereas women are still supposed to dislike sex, and need to be 'taken' sexually. At least from a male perspective, so it's kind of difficult to insult a male for any sort of male-female sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. Pig
is the word I have heard most often when men are wanton in their sexual behavior...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. In Brazil we call them "galinha" (chicken).
And it IS used as a derisive term, believe it or not. In fact, it is almost exactly what the OP was asking for. Of course, it can't be used in the US sice "chicken" is a completely different insult there:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
UCLA Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nothing as stigmatized or as negative a connotation that I know of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. One I don't see very often, but comes close: prick.
Read it today at DU. Not sure if it parallels "slut" or "whore", though.:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
chicaloca Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. According to one study...
The English language has 200 words for sexually promiscuous females, and 20 for men. Julia Stanley did the study in the 70s, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
22. Just like there's no word in the English language comparable

to "effeminate." I guess you could refer to a woman as "mannish"
or "masculine," but it wouldn't have near the negative connotation as effeminate does when used to refer to a man.

And "tomboy," referring to little girls, isn't a put-down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Your post made me think of this:
Effeminate v. emasculate.

Interesting, no?

When I was growing up, "tomboy" sure was a put-down, from boys and girls alike. Is the word even used today, I wonder?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Good question, I wonder if it is used any more.

Seems to me when I was growing up, "tomboy" was kind of like "feisty"--kind of indicated admiration for the spunkiness of the person being spoken of.

Also, it's considered "cute" for a female to have a boyish name or nickname. Such as a girl being called "Charlie," short for Charlotte or whatever.

For a guy to have a girlish name--that's bad. Remember "A Boy Named Sue?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. You're younger than I
When I was growing up, it was terrible to be called a tomboy. It meant you wanted to be like a boy - wear pants, run and play rough-and-tumble games, not behave in a ladylike way.

I was, of course, a tomboy, with a mother and father who - given the time, which was the 1950s - were astonishingly enlightened and who bought me Erector sets and chemistry sets as Christmas presents and who demanded that my elementary school principal not make a peep when I wrote pants to school during the cold weather.

Times change, words change, but there's always gonna be someone out there who's still trying to tell me that I should be what they want me to be.

It's still funny.

That's why names are such a minor part of it all for me. It's the acts, not the nomenclature.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Actually, it sounds like we're about the same age,
when you mentioned the '50's.

That was enlightened of your parents to insist that your school allow you to wear pants during cold weather. At my school too (a public school), girls couldn't wear pants no matter how cold it was.

I'm glad to see that has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. No
Although you can call men by those names, it does not have the same social significance. If it's applied to behavior in other areas, say business, to males, it is not the same thing. There is still a wide discrepancy in how sexuality is perceived in men and women. Of course either sex is capable of hurtful or destructive sexual behavior. It seems to still be more admired in males, at least among other males.
I came across a term I had never heard before. It's "cock-blocking" meaning, that when a male is pursuing a female (or male for all I know), another male gets in his way, and tries to get to her first. When I first heard the term, it seemed a fairly benign situation, this young man liked a girl, the girl had initially responded, but then was attracted more to one of his friends. (Dance of the young, or maybe not so young) Someone asked him "Is he cock-blocking you?" The young man nods sadly. I had to ask what the hell they were talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. I've heard two:
1) "womanizer"--not as insulting as "slut"

2) "poon hound"--read that one in a novel once, but I've never heard anyone say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-19-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. Get with it, ladies!
The current and favorite pejorative is ....

MANWHORE!

My girls use it, and I think it's delightfully descriptive.

LOL: Spell check tells me it's MAN-WHORE, with a hyphen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. "Man-whore" or "horn-dog"
I hear "horn-dog" used quite a bit, sometimes just "dog." I think that's an insult to dogs, but that's just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Women » Feminists Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC