Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More Hardball from the Clinton Camp: 'Obama pledged campaign wouldn't attempt to 'tear people down'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Hillary Clinton Supporters Group Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:15 PM
Original message
More Hardball from the Clinton Camp: 'Obama pledged campaign wouldn't attempt to 'tear people down'

Obama Campaign Character Attacks Not Supported By Facts


At the outset of the campaign, Sen. Obama pledged that his campaign would not attempt to "tear people down personally." (http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/12/obama_on_negative_campaigning.php) This morning the Obama campaign released a strikingly negative memo attacking Hillary's character and asserting that Hillary "has consistently made political calculations to deliberately mislead the American people."

The memo is also dishonest. Below is a detailed look at the Obama campaign's claims that sets the record straight.

60 Minutes Interview

The Obama campaign falsely claimed that Hillary would not confirm that Obama was a Christian in a 60 minutes interview:

Obama’s religion. In a “60 Minutes” interview, Senator Clinton refused to confirm that Senator Obama is a Christian, even though she knows the facts.

Here is how Media Matters' Eric Boehlert described the interview: (http://mediamatters.org/columns/200803110002)

The fact is, if you look at Clinton's exchange with Kroft in its entirety, which lasted less than one minute, I count eight separate times in which she either plainly denied the false claim that Obama was Muslim, labeled that suggestion to be a smear, or expressed sympathy for Obama having to deal with the Muslim innuendo.


Family and Medical Leave Act

The Obama campaign falsely claimed that Hillary had nothing to do with passing the Family and Medical Leave Act:

Her role in passing the Family and Medical Leave Act. Clinton credits herself with “helping to pass” the Family and Medical Leave Act as First Lady. But the 11,000 pages of schedules don’t contain a single mention of her involvement in the issue.

Here is what Debra Ness, President of the National Partnership for Women and Families, said about Hillary's involvement in FMLA:

Hillary was instrumental in getting the Family and Medical Leave Act signed into law. We at the National Partnership for Women & Families as well as other family and labor groups had been pushing for the law for nearly 10 years. Hillary brought her work and experience on behalf of children and working families to the campaign trail in 1991 and 1992 and knew the importance of getting this legislation passed immediately. Two weeks after President Clinton was inaugurated, it was done.


Experience

The Obama campaign says every year she worked at a private law firm, she was not engaged in public service:

35 Years in Public Service. The oft-repeated Clinton claim that she has 35 years of public service experience is simply false. Fifteen of those years were spent at a law practice.

During that time, Hillary was First Lady of Arkansas, Founded Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, was appointed by President Carter to the board of the U.S. Legal Services Corporation, Chaired Rural Health Advisory Committee in Arkansas and was on the board of directors of the Children's Defense Fund, among other activities in the public service.

Sen. Obama also worked in private practice for about a decade, and doesn't exclude that period of time from his experience in public service.

The Obama campaign also denigrates her experience as first lady, where she represented the United States in more than 80 countries. More on Hillary's foreign policy experience HERE: (http://facts.hillaryhub.com/archive/?id=6465)

Florida and Michigan

The Obama campaign is misleading voters about Hillary's position on Florida and Michigan:

The Michigan and Florida primaries. Back when it suited her political purposes she said the Michigan primary “didn’t count for anything” and that she wasn’t leaving her name on the ballot to try to legitimize the results. But now that she desperately needs more votes, she’s doing just that. And despite her pledge not campaign in either state, she held two campaign events in Florida.

In the interview that the Obama campaign cites, Hillary made it clear that Michigan was essential for the Democrats chances in the fall and that's why she left her name on the ballot:

I did not believe it was fair to just say goodbye Michigan and not take into account the fact that we're going to have to win Michigan if we're going to be in the White House in January 2009.

More info HERE: (http://facts.hillaryhub.com/archive/?id=6628)

Hillary actually abided by the rules not to campaign before the primary concluded, unlike Sen. Obama who ran advertising in Florida.

NAFTA

The Obama campaign falsely claims that Hillary was not critical of NAFTA in the early 1990s:

Her position on NAFTA. Clinton tells Ohio voters that she has “been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning.” Yet her own schedules show that as First Lady she attended at least four meetings to advocate for its original passage.

Here is what David Gergen, who organized at least one of the meetings, had to say about Hillary's views at the time: (http://facts.hillaryhub.com/archive/?id=6639)

I was actually there in the Clinton White House during the NAFTA fight and I must tell you Hillary Clinton was extremely unenthusiastic about NAFTA. And I think that’s putting it mildly. I’m not sure she objected to all the provisions of it but she just didn’t see why her husband and that White House had to go and do that fight. She was very unhappy about it and wanted to move on to health care. So I do think there’s some justification for her camp saying, you know, she’s never been a great backer for NAFTA.


Disclosure

On a week when 11,000 pages of Hillary's White House schedule were made available to the public, the Obama campaign is continuing to attack Hillary's transparency. At the same time, the Obama campaign has not released a single page of his state senate schedule or records. (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8STLEOG0&show_article=1&catnum=0)

There are 20 years of Hillary's tax returns in the public record and she will release all of her post-White House returns next month. Sen. Obama has released one year of his tax returns to the public and refuses to release any other years. (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/the-obama-tax-a.html)


3/21/2008 11:50:16 AM #


http://facts.hillaryhub.com/archive/?id=6664
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. BO has had the attack machine in full swing--its a meaness that I have not seen before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sure is a big change from politics as usual, eh?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IowaGirl Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is this posted out in the general discussion area? I know you'll get guff but we're gettin' down to
the wire here and it's time to go all out. This is very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Have at it.
That's what it's posted here for. The campaign is hoping we use this info to the greatest effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is slimy stuff:

"His campaign staffers, too, have become frustrated by the focus of the media’s attention, specifically that the press has not covered Clinton in the way they expected it would. During an interview this summer, Obama’s friend Valerie Jarrett said to me, unbidden, “He is a man who is devoted to his wife. There aren’t going to be any skeletons in his closet in terms of his personal life at all. Period.” And at a campaign event in Iowa, one of Obama’s aides plopped down next to me and spoke even more bluntly. He wanted to know when reporters would begin to look into Bill Clinton’s postpresidential sex life."

That's from the first link you posted.

Why would Bill Clinton's "postpresidential sex life" have anything to do with whether HRC should be president or not?

Why would the Obama campaign expect them to go there? Why would they drop such blatant hints that they should? Is that any way to run a positive campaign?

They should be careful. It's possible that Barack has cheated on Michelle, despite his devotion to her. Men aren't always following their brains .
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Be careful what you wish for. I believe in karma
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 05:56 PM by robbedvoter


Add to this the fact that they clearly had a deal with MSGOP at the time BO kicked Faux - their competition to the curb - and some of the MSM coverage becomes more clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's Very Interesting
And it could explain, in part, why MSM wouldn't touch Larry Sinclair with a 10-foot pole. ie, force the candidate(s) to do that one on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Hillary Clinton Supporters Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC