Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats Envision Working Control Of the Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:17 AM
Original message
Democrats Envision Working Control Of the Senate
The Wall Street Journal


Democrats Envision Working Control Of the Senate
Fund-Raising Edge, Republican Retirements Provide Opportunity
By GREG HITT
March 5, 2008; Page A8


(snip)

The Democrats hold a 51-49 edge in the Senate. Sixty votes are needed to overcome opposition filibusters, and that is the Democrats' target. A more realistic goal is winning enough seats to build a working 60-vote majority through alliances with moderate Republicans. Republicans are far from ceding defeat. They stress that the political landscape could look much different later this year, especially if Sen. John McCain, who locked up the nomination yesterday, is able to attract independents to the party and sow public concerns that Democrats are too liberal to run the country.

(snip)

Even if the Democrats win both the presidency and solid control of both houses of Congress, history suggests it won't be easy to pass major legislation. The last time the party enjoyed such power, during President Clinton's first two years in office, a sweeping health-care overhaul championed by the Clintons went nowhere. More recently, President Bush couldn't persuade a Republican-led Congress in 2005 to get behind his drive to remake Social Security. Still, the possibility of a federal government dominated by Democrats is getting attention from interest groups of all stripes.

(snip)

In the war for money, Democrats are building on gains in the 2006 election, when party leaders began to break the long Republican edge. At the end of January, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the political arm of House Democrats, was sitting on a $35.5 million pot of cash. House Democrats pulled in $2 million last week at a fund-raiser at Washington's Union Station. The National Republican Congressional Committee, the GOP's House counterpart, had only $6.4 million. House Republicans hope a mid-March fund-raising dinner will bring in an additional $7.5 million. House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio recently exhorted fellow Republicans to get off their "dead a-" and step up efforts to fund the party, Republican officials said.

The House is likely to stay in Democratic control. Democrats currently have a 231-198 edge, with six vacancies, meaning Republicans need to win 16 seats to regain control. More than two dozen Republicans have decided to retire, compared with only five Democrats... Of the 11 House races rated by the nonpartisan Cook Political Report as toss-ups, 10 are Republican-held open seats. Democrats, who are making the economy a major focus of their campaign, have particularly strong chances of picking off seats in Minnesota, New Jersey and Ohio.

(snip)

In the fight for the Senate, Democrats are aiming to capture longtime Republican territory. Of the 35 Senate seats up for grabs, 23 are held by Republicans. "We feel the wind is at our back," says New York Sen. Charles Schumer, who heads the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the political arm of Senate Democrats. Dan Danner, executive vice president at the National Federation of Independent Businesses, said Democrats "could very easily" get to 57 seats this fall, a level that could open the door for initiatives such as expanded medical-leave benefits that his group opposes.

(snip)


URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120468939879812859.html (subscription)


Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. We still have to kick Reid's saggy ass out of the Leader's seat.
Otherwise, we'll have another session like this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree. Dodd may be better (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. A jar of silly putty *may* be better
Dodd will without a doubt be better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. IF the Clintons could not get is done last time why give them another chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why will every post
no matter what the subject have someone who uses it as a way to slam the Clinton's? I didn't really like Bill, not liberal enough for me, nor HRC. They are both however better for us then the rethugs, try to be less vindictive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The Clintons are still working hard to marginalize progressives. They still want to compromise
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 01:52 AM by Vincardog
the radical right and benefit the capitalistic class at the expense of the rest of us. I will quit resisting HRC candidacy when she quits undercutting the progressive populists reforms this country so desperately needs. It has nothing to do with her sex. It has everything to do with the Clinton's and the DLC's policies of selling out the working people
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Senate seats
I don't pray much, well hardly at all, but I pray for enough seats to put Lieberman in a closet and far away from any committees. Ignoring him would be the best revenge for losing a true progressive in that seat. I'm still mad at voters up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Now if we could just get...
working control of the Democrats...

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC