Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why DOESN'T HRC just go ahead and "renounce" her IWR vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:43 AM
Original message
Why DOESN'T HRC just go ahead and "renounce" her IWR vote?
What's the point in refusing to do so?

If she's saying she'd have voted differently had she known different stuff, why can't she just go all the way on this?

I don't understand the point of triangulating here.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DonkeyInChinaShop Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because she has the same instincts as Kerry
If she gets the nomination, she'll lose like Kerry too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. because that would mean she isn't "moderate"
and might risk alienating the angry white men who hate her anyway, but she also lacks any sense of conviction on anything. She wouldn't tell you it was raining outside without a focus group and a cadre of spin doctors spending a week working out how to describe the rain without offending people with bladder problems...

Given how unpopular the war in Iraq is I am at a complete loss as to why anyone is dancing around the issue, but it is a challenge that will be faced by all the democrats who collaborated with the bush regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hillary has always been dedicated to family issues
and done a darn good job at promoting them. She's one fantastic lady.

She's not a Condi who shoeshops while NO drowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. It's the GOP who will face the questions
They rubber stamped W completely. They ignored their oversight duties. How sad for our country. The GOP lost the faith of this country for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. right...
The role of the Democrats at that time is to serve as the "Loyal Opposition", not to trip over one another to get in the picture with bush.

Why didn't she call bullshit before the war began?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Why didn't W?
They had the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. And THEN what would have happened?
Make no mistake, I hated that vote. I was devastated by that vote. BOTH my senators, my New York, state of the Twin Towers, senators voted for IWR. But if Schumer had and Hillary hadn't? What would have happened then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Schumer wouldn't have tried to cost his state a second Democratic senator
When he was chairing the DSCC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. she would have saved her reputation?
and wouldn't be trying to dance around the subject of collaborating with bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary was fantastic in New Hampshire
She made it known the people, the taxpayers, needed their concerns met. She was electric.

Hillary-Obama in 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. She is afraid of being labeled a flip flopper when she is in the general - she assumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. No, she WILL be labelled a flipflopper if she does that "I made a mistake" bullshit.
She has said if she knew then what she knows now she'd NEVER have voted the way she did. And she rightly put the blame on Monkeyboy. He WAS the one who made all the "mistakes." Mistakes being a nice way of saying "He lied like a rug, the fuck."

You know, those bastards ginned up a bunch of bullshit intelligence, they did the "If YOU knew what WE knew..." Big Lie, they played the "dire import" game, they even conned Colin Powell.

Now, I dunno if I have a well-tuned bullshit detector, but I never believed those bastards. And I came out against this war before it happened. And everyone who disagreed with me said "You don't have access to all the intel...." Well, the intel was a load of bullshit, but no one knew it back then. I did simply smell a rat...

I do think people in government, be they flying a desk at the Pentagon or working as a legislator, or for one, want to believe that the executive branch wants to advance our nation, to keep our people safe, to secure those blessings of liberty. No one wants to believe that a psychopathic asshole will seize the office and use it to enrich himself and his friends. Because that's just NOT the norm.

But hey, it happened this time...a crazy man actually started a war just to make himself, his family and his pals rich. That's it, in a NUTshell...

As Condi would say "Who could have EVER imagined....??"

So as for Hillary, I think she should say what she thinks. And she thinks the blame belongs with Porgie and Peppershot Dick. On that score, I really can't argue with her, because I think the blame belongs with them, too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bluestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because the Repukes will vilify her
in the general election, just like they called Kerry a flip-flopper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Who does the GOP have to offer? That's the real joke.
Romney, the flip-flopper who makes Kerry look stable...and he's the best of the lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Because she isn't sorry?
The Clinton's followed the imperial model of many former presidents. They strengthened the embargo on Cuba more than any Republican ever did, bombed Iraq and helped impose deadly sanctions,during Monica-Gate we bombed a pharmecutical plant in Africa- where medicine is needed most..saying it was a weapons plant. Clinton never apologized for it even when he had no proof. Also, the war in Kosovo and turning Serbia into a NATO puppet. Sanctions placed on Haiti, considered action against N Korea....really the list goes on and on as it does for all US presidents. She knows the game, she knows who to serve and she isn't going to apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. We can't forget Bill enacting the Iraqi Liberation Act...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Clinton suspended many embargo provisions. It's the GOP, by and large,
who did the worst of it, Reagan, especially. This link gives an overview: http://www.historyofcuba.com/history/funfacts/embargo.htm

You have to wonder why every president is slow to change the status quo. What are they told that we don't know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Deathly afraid of AIPAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. AIPAC
is powerful to be sure. However, getting rid of AIPAC would not end US imperialism. WOuld our Israeli policies change? Perhaps if the ruling corporatists saw them as too much a liabity or no longer useful. I think the "ruling class" is pretty united in it's support for Israel right now though. It is one of the few countries in the Middle East that we know we can use as a military base and for intell support due to the money we give them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Getting rid of AIPAC wouldn't change anything except that
the rhetoric might be a little more honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. People are deaf when it comes to Hillary

She apologizes ...pundits say it is not grovelly enough...

...and the sheeple of DU regurgitate pundit puke


Lather....rinse...repeat
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I wasn't attacking HRC. And I wasn't saying she should "grovel"
I just can't figure out why she'd make the pointless distinction between saying she'd have voted differently if and just plain "renouncing" the vote.

It doesn't seem like she has anything to gain by sticking to that fine point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-13-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Well if it is such a "fine point" what the hell difference does it make?
This is boosh's war. People need to remember that

and stop going along with the idiot talking heads
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. I'm not going along with ANY "talking heads" I'm just saying she should wash her hands of it.
Edited on Wed Feb-14-07 02:24 AM by Ken Burch
If I was advising the Senator, I'd tell her to just say "The peace movement was right and the Administration was wrong. And everyone in the Democratic party who denounced and distanced themselves from the peace movement was wrong too."

"I'm strong enough to admit it when I'm wrong, unlike the Republic Party, who will gladly let thousands more of our troops and tens of thousands of additional Iraqi people be slaughtered just to avoid admitting that they screwed up. The way of Johnson, Nixon, Bush and Reagan will not my way! In a Hillary Clinton administration, Nobody will die for the sake of my ego!".
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ronleslie Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hillary does not admit mistakes easily + she didn't read the NIE
Hillary does not admit mistakes easily.   Also, it's kind of
hard for her to say she would have voted differently had she
known then what she knows know, when she had a chance to know
it back then, IF she had taken the time to read the National
Inteliggence Estimate that was issued a week (I believe)
before the vote.   She was encouraged to, but she didn't.   I
would call that dereliction of duty.   On something this
important, you take the time to read a 90 page report ... even
if you do have to go to the buble room to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
demhistorian Donating Member (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. She has already. It seems she didn't do it the way you would like her to?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Democrats Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC